35
28
21
14
7
Nothingonyou :: FFR Batch Submission
QwertyVibin -
Nothingonyou -
LΛVΛ [6.75 / 10]
Winter 2022 Seasonal Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4784411&postcount=392
Simfile Folder Name
Nothingonyou (QwertyVibin)Note Count
878Chart Length
1:53Average NPS
8.0996Estimated Difficulty
64.66
First Note
0:05Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -12
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 6Jumps
x 207
Hands
x 0
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second8 - 24.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
18 - 18.00 nps 2 Seconds
34 - 17.00 nps 5 Seconds
81 - 16.20 nps 10 Seconds
154 - 15.40 nps 30 Seconds
371 - 12.37 nps 1 Minute
614 - 10.23 nps
Color Count
x 421 (47.95%)
x 190 (21.64%)
x 3 (0.34%)
x 185 (21.07%)
x 3 (0.34%)
x 72 (8.2%)
x 1 (0.11%)
x 0 (0%)
x 3 (0.34%)
Posted at 11:21am on December 9th, 2022
Delete .old file thing
A new chart file was uploaded.
Posted at 9:42pm on August 28th, 2023
Nothingonyou (QwertyVibin) [7/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
25.552: Inconsistent with the 32nds like 28.419. On a more general note however, all of those 32nds are in fact closer to 12ths, which better represent the "swing" nature of the fade-ins. So for example, 28.419 should be on 28.404, etc for all the other similar 32nds.
32.699: This seems like it shouldn't be there, and 32.640 should be.
36.404: This roll doesn't fit here.
46.860: Bit odd to layer that, also it's closer to the 8th.
48.934: Missing note.
54.581: Meh, could remove this.
1:10.640-1:32.875: This section is layered and patterned basically the same way as 28.287-36.052, yet it sounds super different. While it is technically accurate in terms of not having ghost/missing notes, it isn't really representative of the song's variations. One thing that really pops up is the 32nds (which should be 12ths) are much less dominant here. Take for example 1:23.473 (randomly picked), it's far less clear than the new snare sound on the 8th at 1:23.522.
1:23.257: Missing note.
This one is a bit of a tough call. There aren't many egregious mistakes, but there is (subjectively) a bit of a missed potential in the second half there. While it is objectively true that both halves don't sound the same at all, the charting isn't "incorrect" per se. Strongly suggesting to consider changes, but otherwise with the small fixes this could go in.
Posted at 9:54pm on August 28th, 2023
Nothingonyou (QwertyVibin) [6.5/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
13.640-13.816 - I suggest changing this 41 to 32 for better PR
24.757-25.375 - I suggest doing [34]1[23][14][34][34]
24.846 - Should be single
28.110-28.243 - A single would’ve been more appropriate for this noise
35.875 - Why jump?
36.404-36.537 - A jump would’ve been more appropriate for this noise
39.404-39.537 - See comment on 28.110-28.243
42.228-42.404 - I suggest [13][13][24]
46.860 - Sounds closer to 46.904
48.934 - Missing note
54.581 - Ghost note
1:10.199 - Should be single
1:12.228/1:12.934/1:14.346/1:15.052/1:15.316/1:15.757/1:17.169/1:17.875/1:18.581/1:19.993/1:20.699 - Missing note
1:21.404-1:21.493 - Should be single
1:22.816/1:23.522/1:24.228 - Missing note
1:24.404-1:24.581 - I suggest 22 (no jump)
1:25.640/1:26.346/1:27.052/1:28.463/1:29.169/1:29.875/1:31.287/1:31.993 - Missing note
1:32.699-1:32.875 - I suggest 212 (no jump)
1:43.110 - Missing note
1:45.699 - “You” vocal
1:48.316 - “With” vocal
1:49.846 - “Ree” vocal
1:49.949-1:50.522 - At least step the earrape correctly instead of just putting an offsync rollwall here
>>Straightforward & consistent, but needs to be polished atm