35
28
21
14
7
Clearness :: FFR Batch Submission
M0nkeyz -
Clearness -
a_hisa [8 / 10]
Aug/Sept 2022
PublicEvents
Released
https://ffr.fandom.com/wiki/A_hisa
Elite Ninja / M0nkeyz Collab
Note to judge: Only the more prominent piano notes are being followed. There's alot of reverb and delay and lower frequency piano notes that kinda fall into the background.
Note to judge: Only the more prominent piano notes are being followed. There's alot of reverb and delay and lower frequency piano notes that kinda fall into the background.
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Clearness (Elite Ninja & M0nkeyz)" vs "Clearness (M0nkeyz)"
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.
Simfile Folder Name
Clearness (Elite Ninja & M0nkeyz)Note Count
1530Chart Length
2:20Average NPS
11.1788Estimated Difficulty
80.97
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 2
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 2 3 - 17 4 - 18Jumps
x 400
Hands
x 9
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 1
Color Hands
x 5
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
21 - 21.00 nps 2 Seconds
37 - 18.50 nps 5 Seconds
86 - 17.20 nps 10 Seconds
167 - 16.70 nps 30 Seconds
454 - 15.13 nps 1 Minute
800 - 13.33 nps
Color Count
x 563 (36.8%)
x 383 (25.03%)
x 238 (15.56%)
x 296 (19.35%)
x 2 (0.13%)
x 34 (2.22%)
x 1 (0.07%)
x 1 (0.07%)
x 12 (0.78%)
Posted at 12:25pm on May 12th, 2023
Clearness (Elite Ninja & Monkeyz) [8.5/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
1.087 & 3.911 & 4.617 & 8.146: These are slightly odd. The intention is clear that it's going to the more subtle notes, but the pitch is essentially identical. It clashes with the actual higher notes like 16.617 & 18.028.
47.322-1:09.558: This section is a bit confusing to play. I get that you're trying to only chart a single piano voice, but at points they're so similar that it kinda feels like missing notes all over the place. Technically it seems mostly correct (would still suggest making sure all the right piano notes are charted), but its not the most intuitive. Do consider maybe charting both voices (not additively) if it can be done without the section being too blurry/crowded.
54.558: Jump.
1:05.852: Jump.
1:07.925: Missing note.
1:51.440: Missing note.
2:00.028-2:06.028: At this point the piano 12ths get so blurred by the reverse sounds that notes like 2:03.793 & 2:04.499 kinda lose their meaning. I don't have an immediate solution but maybe just take a look at those.
This chart is solid and fun to play. The flow is nice, the PR is great and it has unique sections. Some of it is not super intuitive, but it plays nicely regardless so it's no big deal.
Posted at 12:30pm on May 12th, 2023
Clearness
---------
Permission, sync, metadata good.
- 36.205: All the heavy snares (e.g. 36.029) are two-handed jumps and the previous instance of this sound is [34], would be fun to have this sound followed with one-handed jumps to further distinguish it. Already one-handed at e.g. 37.617. (This does break down a bit at 41.323, but it would be a cool consideration.)
- 37.352: Not followed at 31.705. I also think the OHT forced here is not very fitting. Similar at 63.823.
- 40.970: Minijack seems like more than the sound deserves imo.
- 46.176: The transition into this 32nd is a bit sudden and harsh.
- 47.147, 48.558, etc: These sounds these two consecutive jumps go to have pretty different timbre, would be nice to acknowledge this.
- 51.029: Unnecessary column 2 anchor.
- 52.264: Suggest one-handed minijack if you're going to use one; you don't use a minijack at 63.558, so you could also remove this one for consistency.
- 53.676: Possibly [23] jump to force minijack emphasizing piano?
- 54.558, 65.852: This should be a jump for consistency. Given the minijack pattern at 54.205, [34][12][12] would fit.
- 55.529, 66.823: Missing jump.
- 56.941: Missing single.
- 57.558: Misrhythm, this is broken 32nds: https://i.imgur.com/t1TWYxo.png
- 79.617: Consider [13][23][14] for an easier glut pattern.
- 84.205: Piano is technically a 64th earlier at 84.183. Kind of nitpicky.
- 91.617: Jump?
- 109.676: Suggest column 1 for jack to lessen anchor strain.
- I feel like there's a lack of nuance in the patterning in the middle section of this file in particular, but the song is good and the file does some cool stuff for sure. The ending polys are definitely a bit spicy compared to the rest, but it works and is interesting. Definitely some touch-ups and consistency fixes that can be done though. [7.5/10]
Posted at 6:18am on May 19th, 2023
It'd be hard to address each note individually because we've discussed each note extensively, but we've changed alot of things according to the notes' suggestions.
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1527 => 1530
AVG NPS changed: 11.15684 => 11.17876
Hand Bias changed: 3 => 2