35
28
21
14
7
Calling SGNSN :: FFR Batch Submission
Matthia -
Calling SGNSN -
DJ Sharpnel [7.75 / 10]
Aug/Sept 2022
PublicEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273001&postcount=2
oh
✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
Simfile Folder Name
Calling SGNSN (Matthia)Note Count
4098Chart Length
4:09Average NPS
16.5978Estimated Difficulty
90.59
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -52
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 1114Jumps
x 794
Hands
x 365
Quads
x 230
Color Jumps
x 17
Color Hands
x 3
Color Quads
x 2
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second11 - 33.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps 1 Second
23 - 23.00 nps 2 Seconds
41 - 20.50 nps 5 Seconds
99 - 19.80 nps 10 Seconds
195 - 19.50 nps 30 Seconds
569 - 18.97 nps 1 Minute
1091 - 18.18 nps
Color Count
x 2345 (57.22%)
x 1429 (34.87%)
x 28 (0.68%)
x 186 (4.54%)
x 28 (0.68%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 1 (0.02%)
x 81 (1.98%)
Posted at 10:13pm on September 19th, 2022
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Hand Bias changed: -64 => -56
Posted at 3:35pm on July 1st, 2023
Calling SGNSN (Matthia) [8/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
2:31.274-2:56.665 - What’s up with the 192nd singles?
>>CJ Sharpnel
Posted at 3:40pm on July 1st, 2023
Calling SGNSN (Matthia) [7.5/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good
Playtest Impression, 0.9x Rate - Pretty standard Sharpnel experience
37.955 - will probably want a note here
Sure, I guess. Pretty repetitive and rather bland, but I have that complaint for a lot of Sharpnel files. Good to go.
Posted at 5:28pm on July 1st, 2023
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 4092 => 4098
AVG NPS changed: 16.57351 => 16.59781
Hand Bias changed: -56 => -52
Posted at 5:28pm on July 1st, 2023
Fixes
-Added two white note jumps @ 37.955 (consistent with identical samples @ 28.406 & 47.491)
Personal Fixes
-Changed up the short JS segment @ 1:12.845 a bit (less rolly)
-Added missing 16ths @ 1:53.178 & 3:38.147
-Added missing 16ths @ 2:12.263 & 3:57.232
Other
"2:31.274-2:56.665 - What's up with the 192nd singles?" (ositzxz369)
-These are consistent with the identical sample used @ 2:40.817
"CJ Sharpnel" (ositzxz369)
-mm yes
"Sure, I guess. Pretty repetitive and rather bland, but I have that complaint for a lot of Sharpnel files. Good to go." (Tru)
-I had this exact impression too, but then I thought to my self "well if moonearth made it in, certainly this could as well" :thinkies: