ophthalmomyiasis (suicidal_n00b) - 8/10
- funny song
- 21.566 to 21.754: you can be cute and invert this ([23]434) to differentiate this from the snare roll at 21.191
- 21.754 to 21.879: should be 16ths
- 23.629 to 25.129: 24ths here should have a 3-note minitrill to be consistent with the rest of the section, this part also feels a bit too loose to play compared to the latter half of the section
- 51.811 to 1:13.042: some people would suggest you to use the same jumpjack if it aligns with the synth (e.g. 1:08.657 and 1:08.773 should be the same, 1:10.503 should have some jump that is part of 1:10.388, 1:11.773 to 1:11.888 shouldn't be the same chords), but i'm a disgusting non-PR heathen so it's a minor suggestion.
- the 32nd drum roll layering is unintuitive (to me) but it's consistent, i'd normally expect snares to be layered as jumps instead but you layered the bass kicks. not necessarily a big issue though

Chart is sound and plays mostly well. Some of the patterns here in this feel pretty unconventional (especially the consistent jumpjacks and 24th runningmen) to play through due to the lack of hand balance, but the pattern structure is clear and I think it's ultimately appropriate. Well done.

ophthalmomyiasis (suicidaln00b)

- Offset's good.

7.222 - This sound feels less significant to use a jump.
*21.254 - This and other 24th stream iterations - I'm not exactly a big fan of utilizing staircasey back and forth streams like this, due to descending drum hits that feel more intricate to use two-handed trilly streams instead, plus staircasey patterns like this kinda makes the patterns around it unintentionally OH trilly.
36.191 - cute
51.119 - This staircasey stream patterns worked better than 21.254, so this one's alright.
56.388 & 56.619 - These 48th jumps should be a single, in my opinion. (1:01.696 & 1:01.927, and so on with these 48th jumps)

A lot of the anchoring sequence in this chart feels fitting and deserves hard patterning like this, and I liked the idea of sticking through it the entire way through. Most of my notes are pretty subjective, but I enjoyed this a whole lot even with the aggressive take. I still think you could tinker with the *'d point above, but it's not that FR-worthy to me. [8/10]