Icicle Stinger :: FFR Batch Submission
Mipha -
Icicle Stinger -
ROKINA [6.5 / 10]
June/July 2022
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
Icicle Stinger (Mipha)
Note Count
2338
Chart Length
2:19
Average NPS
17.3228
Estimated Difficulty
102.12
First Note
0:04
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
No Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 697
4 - 185
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
13 - 39.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
16 - 32.00 nps
1 Second
28 - 28.00 nps
2 Seconds
51 - 25.50 nps
5 Seconds
126 - 25.20 nps
10 Seconds
247 - 24.70 nps
30 Seconds
693 - 23.10 nps
1 Minute
1126 - 18.77 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.33s0.43s0.43s0.43s0.43s0.43s0.43s0.43s
Posted at 9:48pm on April 6th, 2023
Icicle Stinger (Mipha) [6/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC NOT OK (-0.061)
8.454-14.348: I cannot figure out the layering here. For example, I don't understand why these notes aren't either all singles or all jumps: 8.664, 9.506, 10.348, 11.190, 12.033, 12.875, 13.717.
26.033: Single.
31.033: Ghost note.
31.348: Missing note.
34.401: This should be on 34.506.
35.927: Jump.
39.296: Jump.
39.454: Missing note.
39.769: Missing note.
51.190: Hand.
54.243: Hand.
55.822: Missing note.
1:28.822: Missing note.
1:38.717: Missing note.
1:48.980: Hand.
1:54.243: Hand.
1:56.243-2:08.664: Cannot figure out the layering here. Looks like a mix of the melody and the crashes, but it just ends up being confusing.
2:07.664: Ghost note.
2:09.927: Missing note.
This chart has a nice idea but lacks execution. There are many inconsistencies (I only listed those I could find quickly), and the layering is too confusing. While it is understandable that dense chordjack with hands isn't the easiest to PR and/or structure consistently, this chart would imho benefit a lot from toning it down with the melody layering. You could for example not layer the first note of every 8th swing, like H-JH-JH-JH... instead of H-HH-HH-HH... (where J is jump and H is hand) since we barely hear the first notes anyways. Maybe if this gets polished up a fair amount the layering could be justified, but as is it's a no from me.
Posted at 9:55pm on April 6th, 2023
Icicle Stinger
--------------
- Permission good.
** Sync significantly early, change offset -0.033 -> -0.060. Timestamps given with this change made.
** Metadata contains background and banner info, please remove.
- 21.432: Missing hand.
- 30.218, 31.060, 34.428: Ghost note.
- 31.376: Missing note.
- 37.112: Missing hands every third 8th note?
- 39.797: Missing note.
- 51.218, 54.270, 54.481: Missing hand.
- 55.849: After your layering scheme in the previous section, this note seems odd to omit. (Personal note: this section would seem a bit clearer to me with more focus on just the melody.)
- 56.797: Suggest different jump to distinguish from 56.481 and 57.112.
- 61.534: 16ths start here.
- 63.218, 63.428: Can't hear piano here, suggest removing.
- 87.428: Should be single, see 87.007.
- 91.007: I like these minijacks.
- 114.270: Missing hand.
- 115.428: Not totally sure I agree with a burst here, or at least not one of the same type as 115.849.
** 116.270-127.849: I don't understand the hand usage here--why the departure from your previous layering scheme? I can't figure out what's going on in this section.
- Overall I feel this file is a bit muddied due to its density, but it does make sense overall and generally plays alright, not spiky or anything. However the sync got messed up along the way and I don't have a clue what the layering is doing in the last section. Also some general consistency fixes to be made. FR on **'d notes. [7/10 FR]
Posted at 6:38am on April 7th, 2023
Thanks for the notes!
Yeah, I figured this upload got messed up as well since this was done on o!m editor and didn't pay attention close to enough even on syncing and checking metadata for this properly, so my mistake.
As for 1:56.270~ from Pizza's comment, I switched the layering approach to hands every 4ths since I thought it would have been a bit boring to keep the same approach to the two former chordjack sections, but I guess you're right that you can't catch on to what I did for this since it's pretty convoluted.
Will resubmit this if I got the time.