35
28
21
14
7
If You Can't Hang v2 :: FFR Batch Submission
Pizza69 -
If You Can't Hang v2 -
Sleeping With Sirens [8 / 10]
June/July 2022
PublicEvents
Released
A different chart for the song is already in-game, we have perms.
Probably 10-15 points easier than DZ's and also uncut, I think the two charts are different enough and work well independently of each other. Was asked to submit so made a couple fixes and here it is.
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "If You Can't Hang (Pizza69)" vs "If You Can't Hang v2 (Pizza69)"
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
Simfile Folder Name
If You Can't Hang (Pizza69)Note Count
2036Chart Length
4:10Average NPS
8.2451Estimated Difficulty
66.62
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -16
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 2 4 - 109Jumps
x 517
Hands
x 54
Quads
x 1
Color Jumps
x 1
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second8 - 24.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
10 - 20.00 nps 1 Second
17 - 17.00 nps 2 Seconds
27 - 13.50 nps 5 Seconds
58 - 11.60 nps 10 Seconds
108 - 10.80 nps 30 Seconds
295 - 9.83 nps 1 Minute
546 - 9.10 nps
Color Count
x 946 (46.46%)
x 913 (44.84%)
x 11 (0.54%)
x 123 (6.04%)
x 7 (0.34%)
x 20 (0.98%)
x 6 (0.29%)
x 0 (0%)
x 10 (0.49%)
Posted at 9:02pm on December 30th, 2022
If You Can't Hang (Pizza69) [7.5/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
17.560-27.560 - Shouldn’t there be a bit more hands in this section?
28.967 - Missing jump? Snare
31.310 - Sounds closer to 31.271
32.677/37.677/42.677/45.177/47.677 - Missing note. Compare 35.177
1:09.123-1:10.060 - Are you stepping the Vocals or the Cowbell?
1:10.529 - Missing jump. Vocal
2:19.123-2:20.060 - See note on 1:09.123-1:10.060.
3:07.677/3:12.677 - Missing note. Compare 35.177
3:23.341/3:25.841/3:33.341/3:36.466/3:36.779 - Why no hand?
>>If You Can’t Hang v2
Posted at 9:06pm on December 30th, 2022
If You Can't Hang (Pizza69) [8.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.
- 0:16.154, you use jumps here but not at 0:17.092 and 0:18.654 Despite having the same sound and im not sure why. same with repeat.
- 0:28.967 Should probably be a jump here to match the emphasis of the rhythm like 0:29.435 and 0:29.904
- 1:09.201 I find the choice to chart this specific note quite odd since the sound is ignored for the entire rest of the section while its playing the 4ths. Also 1:09.227 seems to be a ghost note as a different sound is used and this sound is ignored elsewhere. Also a vocal is missed on 1:09.904. You really should look over this section again and make sure everything is how you want it.
- 2:04.435 sounds like a pretty clear vocal but doesn't get a jump. 2:06.935 as well.
- 2:19.123 see 1:09.201
Solid chart. Definitely charts many sections in ways i wouldn't think to do.
Posted at 12:13am on January 16th, 2023
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2034 => 2036
AVG NPS changed: 8.23704 => 8.24514
Hand Bias changed: -18 => -16
--
@ 69.201 & 139.123, since you both mentioned it: I ignored this sound in the rest of the section because the vocals were predominant (and more interesting), but here it's briefly attention-grabbing to the point that I'd call it the focus of the song. I switched entirely as opposed to just layering them both in at once because I want my structure to feel clear and snappy when playing.
I am actually a bit surprised this got reviewed as well as it did because I felt like I often played a bit fast and loose with the layering in an attempt to match the flow of the chart to the flow of the song. 69.201 is one example, another is Storn's comment at 2:04 where I omitted the jumps to emphasize the jump to the next vocal which is a much stronger sound. I kinda forgot to note down what I updated though. Oops. Anyways, thanks for the notes!