Improved layering consistency

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1415 => 1436
AVG NPS changed: 11.09514 => 11.2598
Hand Bias changed: -65 => -72

EGO APOCALYPSE (jacobvl39) [6.5/10]
>Permission good (Valid IOSYS)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good

Playtest Impression, 1.0x Rate - High fun factor, might need to look closer

3.184 - (subjective, can ignore) You may want to avoid this minijack for structure reasons (only one like it in beginning to 7.033)
10.882 - minijack should start at 11.079 instead
12.461 - minijack should start at 12.658 instead
12.855 - not sure what the 32nds are going to
13.250 - missing, assuming you want to follow this drum fill
15.619 - 16.211, 21.934 - move down a 16th to better follow vocal
22.181, .230 - ??? Don’t know what these are here for
25.191 - missing
26.869 - (optional) there’s a missing piano note here you might like to squeeze in
48.086 - 51.244 - You’ll need to give this section a brush over for layering accuracy, these jumps are kind of randomly placed. I assume you’re layering in the piano, in which case a lot of jumps here are a 16th late
52.823 - (subjective, can ignore) not entirely sold on these 32nds in comparison to 51.244
53.415 - might not want this as a jump
58.448, 59.040 - why jump?
1:00.717 - 1:03.875 - similar deal as 48.086 note, this needs some layering rework. Your goal for this is probably very similar to the other section so you might try copy/pasting it
1:07.033 - 1:13.349 - Again not sure on the layering here
1:19.862 - 1:20.750 - Move down a 16th
1:28.744 - not sure why this changes to a split roll here - changing it at 1:29.138 makes sense. Consider keeping the roll going until then or switch to eg. 2134s if you still want a bit of variety here/capture the minor change
1:36.046 - .836 - might like to shuffle this 2 anchor around
2:01.013 - jump
2:08.612 - (subjective, can ignore) Include pls

While there’s a lot to fix up here, there’s also a lot to like. There’s a very fun file in here, and my initial playtest was very enjoyable. Your goals for this chart are pretty clear, and it will result in a solid file once you take some time to fix this up.
This is really quite good for one of your first files, and I’m excited to see what else you’ve got coming our way!

I see we're getting close to two weeks. I made all of the specific changes but some of them were more open-ended, in that a few spots needed a more significant do-over with the layering. I'm still refining it and will hopefully have something up within the next few days. If possible, the judges may want to take another glance and make sure I didn't do anything too egregious.

Judge DMs are always open if you have any questions or want another look at your fixes. I'll for sure want to take another look at a fixed version of this, whenever you're ready.

Ahh, didn't notice we were past the deadline here. Either way, I give up for now. I just haven't been able to come up with any layering rules that make sense or that I'm at all happy with. Maybe I'll come back to this one for a future batch.

Looking forward to your new version! We'll move this to reject then.