35
28
21
14
7
Resistance 3 :: FFR Batch Submission
ositzxz369 -
Resistance 3 -
Pyongyang Hardcore Resistance [6 / 10]
15th Official Tournament (More Than 70 Difficulty)
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Pyongyang Hardcore Resistance - is in the "Permissions List and Information v8" thread. https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=3
Simfile Folder Name
Resistance 3 (ositzxz369)Note Count
1664Chart Length
2:05Average NPS
13.6245Estimated Difficulty
91.89
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 26
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 3 3 - 30 4 - 476Jumps
x 493
Hands
x 72
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 1
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second11 - 33.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps 1 Second
29 - 29.00 nps 2 Seconds
52 - 26.00 nps 5 Seconds
111 - 22.20 nps 10 Seconds
205 - 20.50 nps 30 Seconds
582 - 19.40 nps 1 Minute
1086 - 18.10 nps
Color Count
x 607 (36.48%)
x 505 (30.35%)
x 32 (1.92%)
x 253 (15.2%)
x 21 (1.26%)
x 71 (4.27%)
x 68 (4.09%)
x 69 (4.15%)
x 38 (2.28%)
Posted at 9:49am on October 26th, 2022
Resistance 3 (ositzxz369)
- Offset's fine.
*The layering in with the 32nd bursts do generally make sense, but some of them felt like they're there without much differentiation. As an example, 20.071 vs. 28.798 vs. 29.446, where they have distinctly different sounds, but they're noted to 32nds. It might make sense on a hearing standpoint, but that's a dull choice in my opinion.
The anchors at 36.162 is also a bit too overbearing to me - it makes the chart quite rigid to play, and especially putting on [3] leave less of a wiggle room to pattern variety in regards to the other 16ths or 24ths that are happening in this chart.
**1:09.025 - This is simply too fast to use 32nd bursts, given the sound you're trying to portray formerly doesn't use any of those 32nds, which is rough.
I do like the 1:09.980 as a section though - it has a clear intent on the layering while it keeps you on your toes with no funny business in the spikes.
1:23.684 - Not quite feeling this 16th, it feels very much like a ghost note, since this section is just doing percussion and percussion only.
**1:42.707 - This is an excessive spike for this 32nd streams alone, and a gigantic bias on the left hand as well. There's definitely a bit of PR involved, but this is just waaaaaaaaay too much and should be balanced a lot more.
The chart itself is.............. fine, but there's a real lack of reserve and restraint on how the patterns are used for certain sections, especially with the chords used for certain anchors, which makes it hard to form an interesting layering without being glaringly repetitive. I do feel like for a layering like this, it needs to get the elements spot on, and still generates a level of comfortability with the patterns used.
Not too comfortable with accepting this as-is, especially with the couple of **'d notes, which presents a massive concern throughout the chart, and the **'d note near the end of the file is just too much for me. This can definitely get there, but it needs changes and it's too much to be put under FR. [6/10]