SUPER RENDA BEAT :: FFR Batch Submission
bmah -
SUPER RENDA BEAT -
LuzeriA [5.5 / 10]
Event Tokens
TokenEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
SUPER RENDA BEAT (bmah)
Note Count
1504
Chart Length
2:25
Average NPS
10.5742
Estimated Difficulty
103.11
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 122
3 - 51
4 - 162
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
11 - 33.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps
1 Second
24 - 24.00 nps
2 Seconds
45 - 22.50 nps
5 Seconds
97 - 19.40 nps
10 Seconds
188 - 18.80 nps
30 Seconds
406 - 13.53 nps
1 Minute
695 - 11.58 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.8s0.9s0.9s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.47s
Posted at 2:16pm on December 25th, 2021
For this file to ever get a chance of being accepted, I feel it requires a general awareness that it's a joke file, and the approval of other judges/staff. If there is zero appetite for this, then I will not pursue this endeavor any further.
Posted at 10:19am on August 25th, 2022
SUPER RENDA BEAT (bmah) [8/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
>Additive Layering file, 202.5 bpm 16th jacks
37.348 - Shift the jack to [2] to differentiate the [1] used in the noise of 37.052 and 37.644.
>>I genuinely thank you for putting the longest jumpjack ending as a [34].
Posted at 10:23am on August 25th, 2022
SUPER RENDA BEAT (bmah) [8.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> ‘.dwi’ file found within submission folder contents. Suggest removing. No other issues found within submission folder contents.
-[00:46.089] I kinda got a feel what you’re trying to emphasize by leaving these singles here, but I think they can be quite hard to interpret at first glance and could strengthen structure at first glance by just having these as jumps, like the rest of the 4ths. Same goes for other timestamps following the same situation like 00:47.867, 00:51.422, 00:53.200, etc.
-[01:49.422] Two ways to follow this section. Personally I am more of a drums takes priority person here, which would have these two 24ths before the next 4th removed. There are hi-synth 24ths here, but is a lot more noticeable that the drums do not happen on the 24ths here vs. the hi-synth happening on these 24ths due to peaking.
-peak jank. Sure, ok. I can see this as something that can really grind some gears.
Didn't see the self-post until now when posting notes, but will ask a head judge what they think about it.
Posted at 4:49pm on September 5th, 2022
Thought an update came out on this since I asked a head judge / others to take a look at this, but there wasn't. So might as well provide one later rather than never.
This song was passed to head judges / other judges to also take a look at before acceptance, and the general response was to not accept it, since the only realistic use case for it would be an 'April Fools' release. Velocity further chimed in to say that if it were only to be accepted for such an event, then it should be rejected.
So, ultimately despite 2 judges pre-emptively giving a pass to it, the majority agrees that this should be rejected.
Posted at 11:59pm on September 5th, 2022
Thanks for providing that closure, gold stinger. Hope I can look forward to it on April 1 someday!