Disorder :: FFR Batch Submission
XelNya - Disorder - HyuN ft YURI [5.75 / 10]
October/November 2021
PublicTokenPurchasedEvents
Rejected
G2R2018. Using the artist name as shown on the G2R page rather than the "feat. YURI" seen in osu and Quaver files. idk https://manbow.nothing.sh/event/event.cgi?action=More_def&num=21&event=123
Absolutely zero AntiPA requirements are allowed if used for a Token.
trumaestro wanted me to send this, so I converted it and did. :D

Simfile Folder Name

Disorder (XelNya)

Note Count

1500

Chart Length

2:12

Average NPS

11.6369

Estimated Difficulty

78.42

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -38

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 4 4 - 109

Jumps

x 313

Hands

x 90

Quads

x 1

Color Jumps

x 1

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
20 - 20.00 nps 2 Seconds
36 - 18.00 nps 5 Seconds
82 - 16.40 nps 10 Seconds
159 - 15.90 nps 30 Seconds
446 - 14.87 nps 1 Minute
797 - 13.28 nps

Color Count

x 668 (44.53%)
x 466 (31.07%)
x 6 (0.4%)
x 292 (19.47%)
x 6 (0.4%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 62 (4.13%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.93s0.8s0.77s0.77s0.77s0.63s0.63s0.63s
35
28
21
14
7

(posted for Pizza69)

Disorder
--------
- Sync, permissions good.
- Please remove Credits field of metadata, or enter your FFR username.

- 2.379, 3.934, etc.: Hmm... these heartbeat sounds are 3/16ths, and I'm not 100% sure I agree with trying to mesh them with the 8th piano, but it's hard to think of another way to capture both that isn't super messy, so I think this is alright.
- 9.219, 10.151, 11.395: Ambiguous colour scheme: you're already using white notes for the heartbeat, using the same colour for other sounds at the same time is a bit confusing (especially since that's the only thing going on here).
- 12.172: This triplet is the same as 12.638 despite every sound being different. Strongly recommend mixing it up. Similar issue at 15.125 compared to 14.569, and in the ending at 113.364 and 115.851 etc.
- 14.426, 19.400: Missing note.
- 27.638: Why follow this very soft percussion but not the piano at 27.794? Given the relative focus on piano in the rest of this section, this feels like an odd omission. Similar comment at 32.768, etc. though the percussion is more apparent there.
- 29.970, 34.944, etc.: Missing piano note.
- 48.856: This feels about on the same caliber as the other notes which you omit, e.g. 48.079, 48.390. Why follow this one in particular? Also omitted at 53.380.
- 51.498: This is tastefully done, interesting and gives plenty of emphasis without just being bonkers.
- 56.472: I get what you're trying to accent with this minijack, but it doesn't really work for me. I also feel like 16ths are a bit underwhelming for this little 56.162-56.783 section in general (it's really 32nds playing) and so I think a short 24th stream would fit this better. You could make the patterning a little spicier in the second half to retain the spirit of this minijack without actually using it, too.
* 61.447: This is an extremely nasty burst to have all of a sudden considering it's basically two consecutive left-hand OHTs at 290bpm, especially because you generally hold back in this section (the 16ths are technically quintuplets, not triplets).
- 64.633, 65.566: Strongly recommend omitting these to draw attention to the broken nature of the percussion.
- 67.353-67.975: No 8ths here to match 68.597?
- 68.957, 71.239: I feel like these minijack patterns are too rigid for the sound. Or, if you do decide to keep them, I recommend at least moving the last note (69.374) off so it's not a minijack because the sound is quite different from those preceding.
- 70.073: I have to slow this down pretty hard to tell that there's a note here, I think it might make more sense from a player perspective if this were omitted.
- 75.436-86.006: Again, you're doing a couple things at once with this white note colour theory and it's not super clear. Please tighten this up.
- 77.457: Missing 8th.
- 80.255: Missing 8th.
- 92.845: A smattering of inconsistencies in this section--there are missing notes at 93.390 and 93.700, 93.856 and 96.343 are ghost notes, etc.
- 103.415: Pattern feels too homogeneous for the sound, recommend acknowledging the crashes at 103.415 and 103.726 somehow. Could be through layering or patterning, your call.
- 105.514: Why is this a jump?
- 105.980, 106.136, 106.291: I *think* these technically exist, but they're so indistinct they might as well not, and including them diverts attention away from the real noticeable 16ths like the piano run at 106.680.
- 113.752, 118.726: Missing notes.
- 123.001, 123.467, etc.: No jumps for kicks? You include them at 124.711 and 125.022.
- 126.965, 127.664: Ghost notes.

- This is definitely not a bad file, but needs a bit too much general cleanup to go into FFR in its current state. I also strongly recommend making the burst at 61.447 friendlier because it's kind of ridiculous compared to all the others in the chart. [6/10]

(gold stinger notes)

Disorder (XelNya) [5.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> ‘.sm.old’ file found within submission folder. Suggest removing. No other issues found within submission folder contents.

-[00:22.120 / 00:22.586] Worth adding these singles in given later usage of them with the same hands.

-[00:29.969] Might be a particular conflict of interest here in which instrument here is receiving priority; Most of the 16th layering is revolving around drum usage where-as the introduction of piano is conflicting between when to step drums and when to step piano. For example, this 16th is piano but is left unstepped despite it being within range of a piano stream. A similar situation happens earlier, at 00:27.793 where piano 16th is left unstepped. In this particular case, I’d recommend a clean-up in favor of the piano since it’s holding a higher priority in the medley. I’ve included a list of timestamps in the next note where this is noticeable music-wise.

-[00:27.793, 00:29.969, 00:32.767, 00:34.943, 00:37.741, 00:39.918, 00:42.715, 00:44.892]

-[00:47.612 / 00:48.078 / 00:48.389 / 00:50.099 / 00:52.586 / 00:53.052 / 00:53.829 etc.] Same as [00:22.120 / 00:22.586] (missing 8ths), there’s a lot of similar 8ths like this throughout the file that should be easy to fill in, specifically within repeats of this section.

-[00:56.161] imo the reduction here doesn’t fit with what is set out for the file. Understandable that 32nds wouldn’t work here, 24ths or 20ths could’ve worked well for reduction as well, most irking thing is the 16th minijack in all of it that looks like it’s following vocals, since the vocal syllables land on the 4th and the proceeding 8th, rather than the 16th.

-[01:04.633 / 01:05.099 / 01:05.565] These 16ths are essentially here, but more rhythmically-inclined to drop these in favor of hard drums happening throughout this section. Similar to the 16ths being dropped between hands and triplet singles earlier in this section.

-[01:06.109] Absence of sound, drop the hand. Let the 16th hang as the last note instead.

-[01:53.752] Copy-pasted from the beginning of the file, so this 16th is notably missing as a result of said copy-paste. Multiple other missing 16th locations, such-as 01:55.151 / 02:00.125, 01:58.726, 02:01.213,
-[02:06.964] Ghost 16th.

-[02:07.664] Same situation as the hand at 01:06.109, absence of sound. Drop the single 4th, let the 16th hang.

-Needs quite a bit of clean-up throughout multiple sections. Good song pick, but lacking in structure. I could see this getting in on a resubmission after fixes.

I'll save going through this for after the other two iterations of this song from this batch are judged as a way to potentially save judges time.

Do appreciate the notes mostly though. My only real comment is that I think for Pizza the 192nd usage was a bit of a miss with you. They're meant to be a way to draw attention to a sound, and give it impact where a jump / hand would be horribly out of place. There's not a super set scheme here other than that concept.

Also Gold Stinger - is the "-[00:27.793, 00:29.969, 00:32.767, 00:34.943, 00:37.741, 00:39.918, 00:42.715, 00:44.892]" part supposed to have words following it, or is it in relation to the note above it. /thanks I'm probably being dumb here

the "-[00:27.793, 00:29.969, 00:32.767, 00:34.943, 00:37.741, 00:39.918, 00:42.715, 00:44.892]" is in relation to the note above it, as the final sentence in the above note says "I've included a list of timestamps in the next note where this is noticeable music-wise."

Sorry for not being clear, could probably have written it better by just including it all in the same note.

@ "My only real comment is that I think for Pizza the 192nd usage was a bit of a miss with you. They're meant to be a way to draw attention to a sound, and give it impact where a jump / hand would be horribly out of place. There's not a super set scheme here other than that concept":

I get the purpose of the colour theory, my disagreement is with how it's done and the fact that it's so often ambiguous and muddy how it's used--the same colour is often for very different sounds in close succession and this is confusing. You could use multiple different colours instead to be more expressive, or just use the one colour but be a bit more sparing with how you use it, and accent the other things through patterning or layering instead. Both are valid options.

Now that Tru's is judged, would like to follow up, won't be resubbing - but thanks for the notes as they're gonna go to the Stepmania one for improvement there.