Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP? (t+pazolite Remix) :: FFR Batch Submission
DarkZtar - Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP? (t+pazolite Remix) - Calliope Mori [8.25 / 10]
October/November 2021
PublicEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=3
Die

- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP [t+pazolite Remix] (DarkZtar)" vs "Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP? (t+pazolite Remix) (DarkZtar)"

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

Simfile Folder Name

Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP [t+pazolite Remix] (DarkZtar)

Note Count

2624

Chart Length

2:55

Average NPS

15.7377

Estimated Difficulty

95.94

First Note

0:08

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 46

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 2 3 - 347 4 - 308

Jumps

x 400

Hands

x 234

Quads

x 38

Color Jumps

x 7

Color Hands

x 1

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
12 - 36.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
16 - 32.00 nps 1 Second
28 - 28.00 nps 2 Seconds
49 - 24.50 nps 5 Seconds
104 - 20.80 nps 10 Seconds
200 - 20.00 nps 30 Seconds
551 - 18.37 nps 1 Minute
1019 - 16.98 nps

Color Count

x 1342 (51.14%)
x 750 (28.58%)
x 56 (2.13%)
x 280 (10.67%)
x 24 (0.91%)
x 88 (3.35%)
x 3 (0.11%)
x 9 (0.34%)
x 72 (2.74%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.9s0.7s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.47s0.37s0.33s
35
28
21
14
7

Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP? [t+pazolite Remix] (DarkZtar) [8.5/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Sync good
>Folder contents, metadata good.
>Drops a couple f-bombs/violence themes, qualifies for [Explicit] tag.

(Playtest Impression, 0.8x Rate) Pretty okay with this file.

77.776 - should be jump (“You’ll” of “You’ll dance anyway”)
150.698 - ^
165.468 - ^

Maybe minor tweaks that don’t overly impact the file. People are going to love this one.

Excuse My Rudeness, but Could You Please RIP? (t+pazolite Remix) (DarkZtar) [8/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good

5.449 - Sounds closer to 5.420
7.622 - Sounds closer to 7.578
7.737 - Chordjack layering scheme seems to be “Kick = jump, Vocal = single, Kick+Vocal = hand, Non-kick+Vocal = jump, Kick+CymbalCrash = hand, Kick+Vocal+CymbalCrash = quad, and Non-kick portion of bzz-filled melody = single”.
11.545/12.468/29.083/31.622/33.006 - Should be jump. Non-kick+Vocal.
15.468/29.545 - Should be single. Non-kick.
31.968 - Should be hand. Kick+Vocal.
50.449 - If this note is for the vocal “Coop-da-ros”, then this is a ghost note. “Da” goes on 50.516 and “Ros” goes on 50.545.
51.276/51.737/52.199/52.660/53.122/53.583 - Should be single. No kick on the trance.
54.699 - Missing note
55.155/58.737/59.199 - Ghost note
1:02.660/1:02.891 - Shouldn’t these be singles? No vocals.
1:05.141 - Vocal is here. This should be jump rather than 1:05.083.
1:10.276/1:14.429 - Should be hand. Kick+Vocal.
1:10.391/1:13.622/1:29.544/1:29.775 - Should be single. Non-kick.
1:32.198-1:32.583 - For this small section, are jumps still going to vocal? If so, then recheck this section.
1:33.688-1:33.809 - If these two white notes are the syllables “-in shit”, then I think it’s off-sync.
1:39.237 - Should be jump. Non-kick+Vocal
1:48.237 - Should be single. Non-kick.
1:50.083/1:51.006 - Should be jump. Non-kick+Vocal.
1:50.520-1:50.636 - The syllables “-ver bad” sound close enough that it could be an 8th jump and 4th hand, respectively.
2:03.679 - What’s this white note going to?
2:11.083 - Should be jump. Syllable “-ni” is here.
2:11.660/2:12.121 - Ghost note
2:15.583/2:15.813 - See comment on 1:02.660/1:02.891
2:37.967 - Should be hand. Kick+Vocal.
2:38.083 - Should be single. Non-kick.
2:46.621 - Should be jump. Non-kick+Vocal.
2:46.737 - Should be jump. Kick.

>>Consistent CJ file!

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2620 => 2624
AVG NPS changed: 15.71371 => 15.7377
Hand Bias changed: 44 => 46