[8/10]

Permission: good
Metadata: good
Offset: good

- 0.190: These bursts are more polyrhythmic, I accept the 24th approximation, but it's rare that you can make poly bursts :P. ( https://imgur.com/a/sIHHqP5 )
- 22.883: Holy shit this sequence of jumps is satisfying to hit.
- 28.652: Missing note, see 29.806.
- 36.152: I would seperate this from the 4th after, maybe make it a 2-note anchor on [3] with 35.960?
- 71.344: Not sure why some of these are hands and others are jumps.
- 71.921: Why are you anchoring these 16ths?
- 81.729, 82.498: No graces to the piano :)?
- 86.921: Should be a 96th at 86.937, there's audible swing here. Also, the 96th is higher pitched.
- 87.402: Yeah bro, this syncopation is super satisfying.
- 94.710: I feel if you're going to include this 16th you should include the 8th as well.
- 102.017, 105.094: Missing jumps to the melody.
- 113.075: I would include this 8th.
- 120.383, 121.921, 123.460, 124.998 etc.: Not a fan of the omission of these 8ths. You could just make them singles, they are a part of the melody.

Yeah this chart is super satisfying and well-layered. I honestly have very little to say other than good job! It's good to go as is, but please do take some of my suggestions into account.

GLAZ (WirryWoo) [8/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.

- 0:10.959 Small nitpick, but i think it would be better if this burst were the same pattern as the previous 0:09.421 as its the same chord and quite recent. adds a little something other than "chord gives 24th burst"

- 0:32.498 I would like to revel in the irony that "three" has 2 notes and "two" has 3

- 0:51.825 I hear no musical justification for this minijack. The two notes are different pitches and i dont even hear a repeated sound. I see no reason for it to be here, it feels out of place and it should be removed.

- 0:59.036 These jumps are for the echo right? than shouldn't they be the same jump as 0:58.652, which could probably be moved anyways since its a different sound from 0:58.459. I think the easiest solution would be to put all these as [12]

- 1:04.805 I'm really not a fan of this needles jack on 4. It implies a repeated note and the main melody doesn't even have a note here. given the speed its especially surprising when there isn't a repeated note. I get you're trying to pr here, but i dont think it should go this far. you have plenty of other jumps to use, i would use one.

- 1:12.305 missing note. same melody as at 0:59.613 and the notes still there.

- 1:21.728 this is a real big missed opportunity for some grace notes, especially with 1:22.498 as i feel it could stand out a bit more.

- 1:35.575 i'm not a fan of how this has been charted. I dont mind the choice to hold back on the notes and to add more in as the section goes on but i just dont think whats here right now works. to start out, there is a missing note at 1:35.863 that should be there as its the same sound that gets charted in the rest of the section. next you have 1:37.113 which isn't part of the same melody and should be removed. I dont mind the streams of notes starting with 1:38.075 but it really feels at this point that too many notes are skipped that shouldn't be. Its loud enough at 1:38.652 that it feels like everything here should be a constant stream

- 1:41.728 I dont mind the jumpstream here, but if you're going to follow the melody with the jumps you should be more accurate. notes like 1:42.017, 1:45.094 are skipped for no reason. I would also like to point out how many long anchors exist in this section that could really be avoided if you wanted to, including a long one hand trill that starts with 1:42.690.

- 1:53.171 shouldn't this be a jump like 1:52.594

- 1:53.363 missing note.

- 2:00.959 i'll be honest, its a real odd choice to mark a stronger sound with a smaller chord. 1:56.344 gets a jump but 2:00.959 doesn't? Also you give 2:01.728 a hand. Its the same delayed note but this sound gets 3x the arrows. 2:07.113 seems especially egregious with this.

- 2:08.844, if these jumps are following the melody than this chord should be on 2:08.652 and not here. This should be empty just like 2:09.228

- 2:11.334 there really should be a jump here.

Personally not the biggest fan of this chart. It focuses a bit hard on PR for me where i feel it could've used a bit more flexibility to help the playability of the file, and there are some other charting decisions that i dont personally agree with. That said its a competently made chart and something i'm sure people will enjoy.