Cutter (VisD) [8/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> Simfile contains "scyther.png" in the BG field.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.

- 0:06.959 This entire burst is actually all 24ths. I understand its a bit hard to accurately represent the quick crescendo while being accurate to the song and not creating a massive difficulty spike. Maybe swapping these out for 12ths could keep the notes accurate to the music and still build with the song.

- 0:16.240 ghost note. Only thing happening here is a shift in pitch with the "vocals" which isn't charted anywhere else in the section.

- 0:16.568 It feels a bit odd to me that this note is left out. the sound clearly starts at or close to the 32nd so its omission is a bit jarring. I could also see the potential to remove the note at 0:16.850 as its quite weak.

- 0:17.178 In a similar way, i really think these bursts should be changed. There are 3 clear beats to each burst here, so really i think having a constant 32nd burst and leaving out the 4th is better and more accurate to the song. Additionally the only note that happens on the 4th is the "vocals" which aren't charted at notes like 017.365 so leaving out the note there is fine. I can understand you wanting to do this for difficulty reasons, but personally i think even if its harder, its well within the difficulty range for this chart, and worth the more accurate music representation.

- 0:17.834 again, the burst should start on the 32nd and not the 16th. but, i think it would be fine to instead ignore the lasts 32nd for difficulty concerns. a [14]23.[24] plays would be better than [14].24[13] i feel.

- 0:18.256, 0:18.631 these notes really stick out when they're the only notes in the burst that dont have some other sound for them. i dont think these patterns really work. I'd rather just see a full burst for the sound and not these weird gallops.

- 0:18.772 I'm sure this is intentional but i'll note it just in case. these burst are actually 3 notes long.

- 0:22.334, 0:25.334 While not technically wrong the sound here feels a bit weak to warrant jacks. This section is also the one of the only times non "vocal" notes are given jacks, so it stands out a bit. I think this would be more acceptable if there were more jacks elsewhere in the song

- 0:24.865 I believe this should actually be 24ths, not 32nds.

- 0:24.959 also shouldn't this jump actually be on 0:25.053 as thats when the kick happens. similar to 0:28.053

- 0:31.897 these jumps are storn approved.

- 0:33.678 This burst should really start on the 16th here. i understand it might be a bit trick with the jump at the end, but i'd prefer an inaccurate 32nd burst to starting the burst later. you even have a similar burst at 0:36.490. or at 0:42.3034 where the ending jump is removed.

- 0:45.303 this section seems a bit needlessly heavy on 23. This happens quite a few times in this chart and it doesn't really feel warranted.

- 0:45.772 there are a few short 24th bursts in this section. the cymbal isn't playing constnat 16ths here, though most of them get covered by vocal jacks.

- 0:57.029 I dont feel the colored theory here is enough. This sound really feels like it deserved a hand. Having it as a jump just feels lacking, even if its colored.

- 1:05.928 missing note here.

- 1:08.693 While i have no problem with the 32nd bursts here, i feel the 32nds could be better used elsewhere in this section. There are quite a few complex the lazery synth in the melody is doing that i feel could make better use of 32nds. places like 1:08.225 personally feel like a better use of 32nds here.

- 1:25.334 this note should be move to 2. There is very clearly a strong hit on 4th, 8th and later 16th. I'm not even sure 1:25.240 should even be in the jack with how soft it is.

- 1:36.865 It might be nice to add a 16th here for the vocals. 1 extra note and the entire phrase gets charted.

- 2:06.334 This burst doesn't really make sense to me. The notse it seems to represent start a lot earlier, and go on a lot longer than the burst implies. It feels arbitrarily placed and doesn't really fit the music.

- 2:15.397 with these jumps rising in pitch, i really dont think PRing the piano should really take over here. The jump place feels really awkward and forced. It feels like the chart wants to do a thing with anchoring the jumps and changing the jump as the notes rise and then it awkwardly shifts back to [34] a lot more attention is drawn to the jumps as they are the bigger chord here with the louder sound. The piano had its time shine earlier in the section so i think its best to stop forcing the jump positions here because of it.

This is a generally well put together file, though the patterning can be a bit questionable and feel quite forced at times. I often disagree with how the bursts are placed/chosen and i have a lot to nitpick, but its a generally solid file.