Help is On the Way :: FFR Batch Submission
storn42 - Help is On the Way - Rise Against [7.75 / 10]
October/November 2021
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=140821
more rise against.

✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

Simfile Folder Name

Help is On the Way (Storn42)

Note Count

1728

Chart Length

3:55

Average NPS

7.4301

Estimated Difficulty

58.1

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 14

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 58

Jumps

x 412

Hands

x 58

Quads

x 6

Color Jumps

x 2

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
8 - 24.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
10 - 20.00 nps 1 Second
20 - 20.00 nps 2 Seconds
31 - 15.50 nps 5 Seconds
59 - 11.80 nps 10 Seconds
100 - 10.00 nps 30 Seconds
258 - 8.60 nps 1 Minute
513 - 8.55 nps

Color Count

x 447 (25.87%)
x 598 (34.61%)
x 12 (0.69%)
x 572 (33.1%)
x 0 (0%)
x 25 (1.45%)
x 12 (0.69%)
x 16 (0.93%)
x 46 (2.66%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.7s1.13s1.1s1.03s0.8s0.7s0.67s0.43s
35
28
21
14
7

Help is On the Way (Storn42) [8.5/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.

-[00:53.617] Willing to do a hand/hard 16th minijack transition utilising a jump here, but not at 00:17.923? Makes 17s feel like a cop-out in comparison.

-[00:54.729] ONLY vocals for this [23] jump feels like a bit much.

-[00:59.729] Compared to 0:55.284, this is ??????? I much preferred 0:55.284 compared to this.

-[01:31.256] Again, with the transition at 00:53.617, a hand would work better in this instance.

-[01:50.840] Repeat note from 00:59.729.

-[01:59.721] Vocal fill?

-Rest of the file is pretty alright past the bridge/solo.

(7/10)

Permission: good
Metadata: good
Offset: good

- 2.090: This pattern should reflect PR better, A B C.
- 4.590: Same here, having this as a [24] feels wrong. The pitch is not alternating between 2 notes here. This would work far better as a [12]
- 17.923: See 4.590, this being lower pitch should be reflected in the pattern.
- 33.062: I understand why these are all on the same column, but pitch wise it should be more of a B A B A pattern.
- 54.590: Jump? See 55.701.

- I can sorta tell you have your own way of doing PR, so I won't mention it anymore.

- 104.451: I know why this tom is a single, but this tom is so important to the rhythm that I kinda wish it was a jump.

- Chart is structered in a comprehensive manner, I can tell what the jumps and hands are going to, but I find the choice of some of it being contingent on what the guitar in the background is doing a bit confusing at times.
- This chart suffers from being way too long and way too repetitve, the same patterns are being repeated to the same sounds over and over and over again. It's structurally uninteresting.

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1723 => 1728
AVG NPS changed: 7.40863 => 7.43013
Hand Bias changed: 9 => 14

gold stinger

[00:53.617] Willing to do a hand/hard 16th minijack transition utilising a jump here, but not at 00:17.923? Makes 17s feel like a cop-out in comparison.
- Its not that i was trying to avoid a minijack here, and more that i just didn't think the note really needed a hand. given the explosiveness, i'll add the hand.

[00:54.729] ONLY vocals for this [23] jump feels like a bit much.
- While i sort of agree, i also feel like it feels a bit lacking as just one note. In my opinion having a jump here is better than just a single note.

[00:59.729] Compared to 0:55.284, this is ??????? I much preferred 0:55.284 compared to this.
- given the snare, i figured it would be better to have jumps here. i understand they're quite soft, so i'll reel it back to single notes.

[01:31.256] Again, with the transition at 00:53.617, a hand would work better in this instance.
- This is actually supposed to be a minijack like at 0:39.867 but I seem to have forgotten.

[01:50.840] Repeat note from 00:59.729.
- noted.

[01:59.721] Vocal fill?
- While i know the vocals exist, With how the rest of the song just stops and how close these notes are to the following hand, i feel its better to leave them out in this instance.

M0nkeyz

2.090: This pattern should reflect PR better, A B C.
4.590: Same here, having this as a [24] feels wrong. The pitch is not alternating between 2 notes here. This would work far better as a [12]
17.923: See 4.590, this being lower pitch should be reflected in the pattern.
- There is more going on in this chart than just PR. While i recognize its important i also need to care about the playability of this chart. While there are a few jacks they are quite short and this isn't some crazy chordjack file. While i do try and use it when i can, i dont have the best ear for pitch and trying to analyze every individual note is a lot of effort for what would be a minor gain.

33.062: I understand why these are all on the same column, but pitch wise it should be more of a B A B A pattern.
- while the actual pitches might be different, if i were to pat more attention to PR, the entire pattern would just become JS, and the notes would lose their emphasis. it would be as if the notes weren't even there. For this reason i feel it is better to ignore PR here, and emphasize the notes for a better chart.

54.590: Jump? See 55.701.
- I'm not sure what you see in this note, but there is no reason for me to make it a jump, in an already pretty dense section. 0:55.701 has things like the guitar and crash going for it that just dont exist here to make it worthy of a jump.

104.451: I know why this tom is a single, but this tom is so important to the rhythm that I kinda wish it was a jump.
- I do not find this tom as important to the rhythm as you do, and with the structure of the chart it will stay a single.