35
28
21
14
7
QUADRA GIRLZ :: FFR Batch Submission
Wiosna -
QUADRA GIRLZ -
DJ SHARPNEL [6.25 / 10]
May/June 2021
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showthread.php?t=140821
Simfile Folder Name
Quadra Girlz (Wiosna)Note Count
3987Chart Length
4:11Average NPS
16.0572Estimated Difficulty
89.47
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 1
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 7 4 - 229Jumps
x 1087
Hands
x 33
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
41 - 20.50 nps 5 Seconds
94 - 18.80 nps 10 Seconds
181 - 18.10 nps 30 Seconds
530 - 17.67 nps 1 Minute
1041 - 17.35 nps
Color Count
x 1420 (35.62%)
x 1114 (27.94%)
x 21 (0.53%)
x 1432 (35.92%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 6:22pm on January 5th, 2022
Quadra Girlz (Wiosna) [5.0/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> Chart is on ‘Challenge’ difficulty.
> ‘.sm.old’ file found within submission folder. Suggest removing. No other issues found within submission folder contents.
-[00:35.812] Would’ve preferred iterations of 16th jumps here to instead follow 4ths here since that’s where the jump focus seems to primarily be during this section, rather than re-introduce the drum 16th jump from the previous section. Applies to similar patterning throughout this section.
-[00:54.481] Introduction of these 16th jumps in this section but they weren’t there in the previous section? If they’re going to vocals, would probably be in better taste just to drop them, since there’s multiple other vocal 16ths in this section that are unstepped. Same with 01:02.159.
-[01:46.124/01:51.297/01:56.469/etc.] No jumps here? Feels like an oversight since these are the same pitch bend jumps that are executed immediately before these.
-Not particularly a big fan of the structure overall, with many repeating tones, different interpretations of the same chorus, and jump usage. The biggest stand-out for me was how sections like 03:06.458 were handled vs other sections of the same chorus management such as 01:43.700. Most of the break verses in-between were fine, but the chorus was a repeat offender that could’ve either used a cut or more consistent structure.
Posted at 6:25pm on January 5th, 2022
Quadra Girlz (Wiosna) [7.5/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
10.920 - No hands during 16th streams, eh?
31.852 - The consistent exclusion of stepping this noise as a jump implies an alternate rhythm is afoot.
31.286-32.902 - ABA ABA AAB rhythm.
85.273/87.859/90.445/etc - For this small section, I see that Kick, Hi-Hat = Jump. But why aren’t these notes here singles?
106.124/111.297/116.469/etc - Missing jump (synth melody)
154.239-154.777 - Why are the singles not jumps?
155.316 - Why not jump?
155.424-165.769 - 2-3-3 Rhythm, evident in anchor. Still not sure what noise determines a single or a jump within these anchors though.
176.114-181.286 - Not sure what the 8th jumps are going to.
188.883/etc - See my note on 106.124/etc
248.527 - If possible, cut the song up to around here.
>>Well, it’s definitely not a bmsCore file. Consistent JS file with no unnecessary spikes (no unnecessary hand bias/anchors).