Euhniverce :: FFR Batch Submission
Matthia - Euhniverce - Terminal 11 [5.75 / 10]
May/June 2021
PublicEvents
Rejected
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=3
sorry

Simfile Folder Name

Euhniverce (Matthia)

Note Count

3049

Chart Length

3:13

Average NPS

15.9689

Estimated Difficulty

104.82

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:02

Hand Bias

x 97

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 197 3 - 247 4 - 312

Jumps

x 689

Hands

x 3

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 18

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
16 - 48.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
23 - 46.00 nps 1 Second
44 - 44.00 nps 2 Seconds
73 - 36.50 nps 5 Seconds
157 - 31.40 nps 10 Seconds
277 - 27.70 nps 30 Seconds
691 - 23.03 nps 1 Minute
1220 - 20.33 nps

Color Count

x 917 (30.08%)
x 605 (19.84%)
x 39 (1.28%)
x 876 (28.73%)
x 60 (1.97%)
x 370 (12.14%)
x 34 (1.12%)
x 9 (0.3%)
x 139 (4.56%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.27s1.1s0.67s0.5s0.5s0.5s0.47s0.47s
43
34
26
17
9

Euhniverce
----------
- Permissions, sync, metadata good.

- 10.949: Why is this a jump?
- 19.269: Can hear why you'd use a minijack here, but the sound is not very prominent and it feels overemphasized imo.
- 25.109, 35.349, etc.: This gives the impression of still being part of the column 1 anchor despite switching to a jumpglut pattern. Recommend [23] or [34] and rearranging the rest of the glut accordingly.
- 28.069: Not clear why this is a minijack on column 4 and this part (from 27.589) is already quite right-hand biased, suggest rearranging. Similar but less pressing issue at 38.525 etc.
- 43.749: I feel a jump would make more sense than a minijack for emphasis here.
- 45.749: Suggest moving this to a different column since it's a different repeated sound than your previous column 4 minijacks. Would particularly suggest column 1 since this is followed by an incredibly aggressive right-handed 20th pattern.
- 65.803: These cyan notes are a little obscure in general, but this one in particular I don't think should be there.
- 69.509/etc.: Not a fan of these 48th flams; they're weird to play and don't represent the sound well imo. I feel coloured jumps would be more effective and would also make it easier to follow the similar sound at 69.989 (with a colour single, for instance) and to represent the drum at 71.109. Also missing at 69.189.
- 75.349: Missing jump.
- 77.829, 81.029, etc.: Overall I like the idea of using trills in these little bursts, but the sound is fairly soft and so it might be worth reflecting that by using friendlier transitions such as this: https://i.imgur.com/idaUbh8.png (Notice how this separates the jacks from the preceding 32nds as much as possible.)
* 91.989 etc.: I see why you're colouring these, but it's not very noticeable from a player's perspective and mostly just adds visual clutter. Recommend colouring normally. Includes later sections like 104.709, though other colouration like 119.109 is fine.
- 100.069: This OHT is pretty rough considering it's not totally isolated (i.e. the burst continues on the same hand after it).
- 103.349: Missing note. Also, why is 103.589 omitted?
- 107.509, 108.229: No minijacks here?
- 111.989: This layering is a bit aggressive--I don't think this or the next 32nd really deserves a jump, it's just that the previous 16ths were really damn loud.
- 115.349: Missing note.
- 118.549: Why are these minijacks? Similarly 131.349.
** 121.349, 134.159, etc.: These are BRUTALLY middle-column biased, please make these a bit more reasonable.
- 128.069: Missing minijack, followed at 128.549.
- 140.816: Suggest either rearranging to get this on column 4 or making it just a 16th to avoid a needlessly tight OHT here.
- 146.629 etc.: Introducing 4-note jacks here is a little mean. Overall they're probably the least of your concerns as difficulty spikes are concerned, but I think splitting them up as e.g. 4433 would work a little better. Alternatively cleaning up the transitions out of them would be fine too (e.g. 153.029 is acceptable).
* 152.069: This is kind of awful on column 3, please rearrange.

** 156.069-end: This is absolutely stupid hard and the layering needs to be toned down significantly to bring this into line with the rest of the file. You'll have to get rid of most of the jumps in 32nds at the very least; maybe keeping the first 2 of each burst as jumps and reducing the rest could work, but in any case it'll need some experimenting and playtesting. Not going to provide technical notes on this part of the file because I anticipate it changing significantly by next time it enters batch, but feel free to DM me if you have any questions or concerns.

- This chart has a difficulty curve reminiscent of New Anachronism, which is quite a statement considering the "easy" part of it is already 95+. I actually really like the first half, but the chart flies off the rails around 155.909 (though in fairness the song kinda does too). Please do rework and resubmit this, though, because it has potential to be a really fun 100+ file. [5.5/10]

Euhniverce - 6/10

Sync + metadata = good

-12.149: This vocal is actually on the 48th at 12.203 (This is probably intentional, and you're consistently stepping it as 16th's so I won't mention it again)

-15.349: The sweeping portion of this sound starts on the 16th so I would put it there, if you really want to highlight this with a 24th I would suggest using a subbeat.
same with the 24ths that follow
15.536 -> 15.509
15.696 -> 15.669
15.856 -> 15.829
You're using 24ths for this sweeping sound throughout the entire song, which is consistent, but I don't agree with it.

-17.269, 19.829, 27.509, 27.829, 30.069, 30.309 etc: jumps to the kicks? They're identical to kicks like 16.709. You're stepping the kick on the 4th, but not on the 16ths, you do this consistently, but why? You're not afraid of using jumps in places like 25.029.

-30.469: I don't agree with this being represented as 32nds, the only notable sounds are coming from the 4th and the 16th, I would just highlight these differently especially since you're using 32nds for so many other sounds here. (again you're consistent with it, but it's not something I agree with)
-31.269: These are okay since the sound actually falls on the 32nds

-39.323: Opportunity for a poly-burst here :)
-41.109, 41.269 (etc.): Why are you not stepping these bleeps?
-42.149: These 32nds feel wrong as well, especially since the second bleep falls on a 64th at 42.249.

-46.149: This offbeat section here is so cool, I feel stepping this as white notes doesn't highlight the offbeat nature of it.
-65.029: This comes in slightly earlier at 65.003 (same with 64.709 -> 64.699, but that one is barely noticeable)
-65.129: I would include this one as well
-65.296: These 48ths would be better highlighted as 24th's since that's where the sound begins.

-76.069: Similar to the 24ths earlier, this sweep starts on the 8th, why highlight it with a 192nd so far away?
-93.829: This feels like a missing note, I would just remove the white note at 93.876 since the sound starts on the 4th.
-94.469: ^

-103.429: Instead of 24ths these are 64ths and 32nds at 103.489, 103.549, then 32nds at 103.669 like this:
https://imgur.com/a/nkBL1u8

I think the first 24ths are fine as an approximation, but the 24ths at 103.643 do feel off.

-106.669: Like 93.829 all these sounds come in at 4th/8th/16th notes, having them start at 32nds seems erroneous.
-109.349: Here you actually do step the 8th and the 16th, it's identical to 108.069
-113.029: I will stop mentioning them because it's a consistent way you're stepping this.
-119.123: What are these white notes going to? You're not stepping them in similar spots like 114.629, 121.029, 133.829 etc
-182.229: This split trill here is such a trap...

Even playing it on lower rates it's very apparent how much the difficulty ramps up towards the end... I suggest toning it down, the 32nd jumptrills especially are a crazy spike

I LOVE the slowdown at the end.

This is very far above my skill level, but I do think this file could use some cleaning up.