Mantra :: FFR Batch Submission
sploder12 - Mantra - Novadrome [7.5 / 10]
Feb/March 2021
PublicEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4756334&postcount=297
Audio may need to be adjusted to be at a good volume.

Simfile Folder Name

Mantra (sploder12)

Note Count

108

Chart Length

1:32

Average NPS

1.2103

Estimated Difficulty

1.99

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:02

Hand Bias

x -2

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 0

Jumps

x 30

Hands

x 0

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
2 - 6.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
3 - 6.00 nps 1 Second
3 - 3.00 nps 2 Seconds
5 - 2.50 nps 5 Seconds
10 - 2.00 nps 10 Seconds
17 - 1.70 nps 30 Seconds
44 - 1.47 nps 1 Minute
84 - 1.40 nps

Color Count

x 100 (92.59%)
x 8 (7.41%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.6s1.6s1.6s1.6s1.6s1.6s1.6s1.6s
35
28
21
14
7

changed file name from "Mantra (Sploder12).zip" to "Mantra (sploder12).zip"

Mantra [7.5]
12.884 starting here (and wherever this repeats later on, which is all the way until the end) the pitch is AABB. Is there a specific reason you chose not to structure the jumps that way, sharing only one column per pair of jumps? You do this correctly at 27.284 for instance.

Okay, so this file is acceptable as is, as I don't think newbies will particularly care about the PR precision of jumps, *but* I really want to see a bit more structure in this. Specifically, relating to the note above: whenever you have the AABB thing, you should have 2 jumps of the same, then 2 jumps of another, with BB lower than AA ideally (doesn't have to be true all the time).

This may be feel incredibly repetitive, so I'm tempted to say you should do that up to 36.884. After the break here, when the jumps resume at 41.684, you can basically have random jumps if you want, or at least pairs of jumps between A-A and B-B that share just one note, not both.

That way, you develop a sense of progression throughout the chart, even though the song is repetitive. At the same time, there's more structure and PR involved, which help to improve the file overall.

_No CQ_ as this suggestion borders on transgressing authorial intent, and file is acceptable already, but please seriously consider the idea here. It will make the file better.

Accounts for VisD's feedback. I can't remember the original reason for the jump placement so I probably just thought they were different pitch. I really like this new structure, thank you!