05-29-2008, 02:19 AM | #741 | |||||||||||
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
As an aside, you might want to actually try using the forum's quote functions. They make seperating out what you're quoting us as saying, what you're paraphrasing us as saying, and what you are in turn responding much easier to tell apart.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So since they are -starting- from an assumption that "homosexuality is an issue that we view as a threat" they are automatically almost unforigveably biased. Let's quote from their main page again: Quote:
Your institute sets forward "Our purpose is to prove that Homosexuality is evil bad and wrong" which is horrible science right from the get go. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Moderator Note: I think you can take a day off to relax, and think about insulting the intelligence of other people. You might also consider formatting your posts in a way that makes it more clear what you are directing to whom about what text. As I mentioned at the top of the post, there is a very conveniant set of "quote" tags that can make your posts much easier to parse. |
|||||||||||
05-29-2008, 09:28 AM | #742 |
Little Chief Hare
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Something stupid happened here. I'll be back in 8 hours or so after I've gotten my sleep.
|
05-29-2008, 11:01 AM | #743 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 153
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
No matter what one believes, the fact remains, if one marries another, it has nothing to do with the couples around you and therefore shouldn't even be a problem at all.
And constantly turning to "God" as an excuse to why certain people shouldn't be married is about as cheap as you can get!
__________________
The minute you forget to think about tomorrow, you lose everything. download my sims now =3: http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...h=Corbin+Wells FFR Furry, NYC |
05-29-2008, 11:14 AM | #744 |
FFR Player
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
So after checking out the FRI's website I was unable to determine whether their "scientific articles" are published in refereed journals (I doubt it since no publications, only references, were listed).
Seems more like a twisting of data to see a trend that you want to see.
__________________
|
05-29-2008, 11:56 AM | #745 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Not to mention their founder was dropped from the APA and they are considered a hate group.
And they have ONE scientist on staff (Dr. Kirk Cameron.........lol?). Pretty sure there's no credibility to be found here.
__________________
squirrel--it's whats for dinner. |
05-29-2008, 08:35 PM | #746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Little Chief Hare
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ok, now for, um... thing Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Seriously, you start out yelling at others for not taking your argument seriously, and then here you are, saying that another person's willingness to contradict you about whether or not homosexuality is bad, demonstrates that they are homosexual and therefore bad. ...yeahhh, ok. Top notch critical thinking there. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, here's something special... Quote:
Although his general disposition certainly doesn't make it any easier. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And now I start getting ready for work. Yay 50 hour weeks! |
||||||||||||||||||||||
05-29-2008, 09:02 PM | #747 | ||
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by devonin; 05-29-2008 at 09:14 PM.. |
||
05-29-2008, 09:50 PM | #748 |
FFR Player
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
I was making a point that homosexuals aren't all necessarily attending gay parades and flaunting their orientation though that outlet. That some are ashamed and are living in fear of rejection by their friends and family.
I don't realize how that can be construed to mean "You're gay because you're against gays". After which I was promptly told I was gay because I supported gay rights.
__________________
He who angers you conquers you. ~Elizabeth Kenny |
05-29-2008, 09:51 PM | #749 | ||||||||||||||||
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Quote:
Quote:
Dev then claims Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Dev then asseverates Quote:
Dev conjectures Quote:
Dev then elaborates on his already evident statement Quote:
Unfortunately, for those who don't share this same assumption, your statement is meaningless. Dev claims that he's Quote:
Dev claims that Quote:
Dev criticizes my reference point Quote:
Dev then makes a huge mistake in referencing bi-sexuality Quote:
Dev then says Quote:
You mean aside from their parades? Irregardless, it's all beside the point; I simply meant that anyone who's sexuality be exemplified in their personality e.g. fake lisps, taunting, exaggerated perversity (the only conceivable way to detect homosexuals), are doing themselves a disservice. There are many distinctive factors, which don't include sex, that account for the general way in which people associate. Dev, determined to keep his error streak snowballing furiously downhill, yet again tries to defend Grandi's arrogance Quote:
Dev then makes a most curious offer Quote:
While I greatly appreciate the offer, I'm afraid I shall respectfully decline . There's an old saying attributed to Mark Twain: "It is better to be silent and thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt." I can only suggest that (A specific pastor here ) consider whether it might, in some small way, apply to him. As for Kilroys comments, all I can say is, it can be hard to formulate a legitimate counterargument for one that you've not yet achieved an adequate understanding. Peace everyone! Last edited by A_name1; 05-29-2008 at 09:55 PM.. |
||||||||||||||||
05-29-2008, 09:56 PM | #750 |
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: Homosexual Marriage
Oh right, I was going to close this thread because the only person taking the anti-homosexual standpoint was a ban evader. I should get on that.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|