07-26-2013, 10:01 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
omg yes
|
07-26-2013, 10:18 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
Re: omg yes
holy shit this is so amazing
|
07-26-2013, 10:43 PM | #3 |
ᅠ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,652
|
Re: omg yes
dude i saw this on cringe
yiaess
__________________
|
07-26-2013, 10:58 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
Re: omg yes
I love shit that strides that line of intentional/unintentional, the vegan guy would be the best comedian if this weren't serious but you can never tell for sure
|
07-26-2013, 10:59 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
Re: omg yes
the club penguin video is amazing just for how it manages to compile so many things seen as bad simultaneously in a way that's, arguably, unintentionally art
you can take it as a statement on aesthetic objectivity even though the author is obviously not nearly knowledgeable enough to put it that way |
07-26-2013, 11:22 PM | #6 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: omg yes
What is even going on in the Club Penguin video, lmao.
|
07-27-2013, 12:12 AM | #7 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,757
|
Re: omg yes
keep em coming arch
please
__________________
|
07-27-2013, 12:07 PM | #8 |
Dark Chancellor
|
Re: omg yes
arch I think this is along the lines of what you're talking about, except has no redeeming value
__________________
|
07-27-2013, 12:29 PM | #9 |
moonchild~
|
Re: omg yes
Soundtrack by Nickelback and Justin Beiber lmao
__________________
|
07-27-2013, 01:47 PM | #10 |
Dark Chancellor
|
Re: omg yes
is it bad the first thing i noticed was the comic sans
__________________
|
07-27-2013, 02:21 PM | #11 |
ごめんなさい (/ω\)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 28
Posts: 2,290
|
Re: omg yes
|
07-27-2013, 03:34 PM | #12 |
Fractals!
|
Re: omg yes
You realize that the bolded phrase makes it porn, right? There was a supreme court case in the 60s that basically said "if it has no redeeming value, it's porn."
|
07-27-2013, 06:08 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
Re: omg yes
that isn't accurate, igotrhythm
a similar argument has been made by sex-negative 3rd and 2nd wave feminists to why sexually objectifying content should be considered porn even without nudity but it relies on a misreading of the criteria, it's not solely a no redeeming value thing also, I feel like the "no redeeming value" argument stigmatizes the visceral and holds up a dualistic view of human experience; even if the only value in porn is its visceral value, I don't think that is "not redeeming" |
07-27-2013, 06:20 PM | #14 | |
"Reach For The Stars"
|
Re: omg yes
The vegan guy. dying.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|