TWG CLX If Emblem was a bad employee Game Thread

[andy-o24]

I think lynching someone who has popped in and not done anything further is a better chance of hitting scum than someone who is completely null for not checking in at all

Obviously I don't how to read it, but I would think someone who at least pops in once to say "Hi, I'm here. I remembered" is more towny than wolfy. It seems there is a proper balance between low posting and no posting to conceal wolfiness because less activity puts less light on you, but no activity is pretty bad.

I don't think no posters are automatically lynch fodder, but they are higher on my tier list. That's to say I'd rather lynch a no poster than a one poster.

-o24

[danceflashrevo]

Originally Posted by andy-o24

Obviously I don't how to read it, but I would think someone who at least pops in once to say "Hi, I'm here. I remembered" is more towny than wolfy. It seems there is a proper balance between low posting and no posting to conceal wolfiness because less activity puts less light on you, but no activity is pretty bad.

I don't think no posters are automatically lynch fodder, but they are higher on my tier list. That's to say I'd rather lynch a no poster than a one poster.

-o24

I find myself being able to argue both sides of the point lmao

[AragakiAyase]

Originally Posted by andy-o24

Obviously I don't how to read it, but I would think someone who at least pops in once to say "Hi, I'm here. I remembered" is more towny than wolfy. It seems there is a proper balance between low posting and no posting to conceal wolfiness because less activity puts less light on you, but no activity is pretty bad.

I don't think no posters are automatically lynch fodder, but they are higher on my tier list. That's to say I'd rather lynch a no poster than a one poster.

-o24

disagree because wolves want to look town and popping in to announce your presence, then not coming back comes off to me as a wolf putting in the absolute minimum