03-6-2011, 02:38 AM | #161 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Somewhere in Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 766
|
Re: Drugs
For someone who is currently writing personal/general documentation pertaining to ergolines, Cannabis, and Salvia Divinorum; this thread makes me sad. Then again, I always expect drug threads on casual forums to be like this. Luckily, this is much better than the majority I've seen.
I do agree with Vendetta's mentality though. I realize that we're talking about mind altering substances, but it's too broad for Critical Thinking. Same kind of broad aspect if a topic were to be called something like "European Countries". Oh well, I suppose I expect too much. My contribution to the thread: The Union ^ Watch this movie ^ P.S. - For the sake of accuracy (and personal pet peeves), I hope people can refer to "acid" for talk on current blotter/experience and "LSD" for the historical aspect of it (wink wink Aperson).
__________________
Oh hay I used to play ITG |
03-6-2011, 03:55 PM | #162 |
FFR Hall of Fame
|
Re: Drugs
Why? Because sometimes your blotter paper is full of DOB? When you drop a hit of acid you're taking LSD-25, plus a few random impurities, so I really don't get why the arbitrary distinction is necessary.
__________________
Last edited by aperson; 03-6-2011 at 04:10 PM.. |
03-10-2011, 01:00 PM | #163 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 25
|
Re: Drugs
I will say this, I am VERY strongly against illegal drugs, but I would like to mention that although I do not condone recreational use of pot, I do think that it should be legal for it to be used for medicinal purposes. I also believe that it should be taken in forms other than smoking it. Also, I find it interesting that people say it's fine to use it recreationally but they don't mention recreational use of prescription medication. It always pisses me off when people mention how harmful some of the contents of prescription medications are. Yes, they are harmful, which is why you need to have a prescription from your doctor to use it. People die by misusing prescription drugs.
|
03-10-2011, 01:24 PM | #164 | |
Sectional Moderator
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
People with ADHD take Adderall daily to cure a behavioral problem that is only really seen as a problem in modern Western society, and is likely induced by aspects of modern Western society. If either of these sentiments are even remotely true then I wonder if by your morality it is okay for someone to take this drug in the fashion that they do. Is it? Is it wrong for someone who researches and understands the effects of adderall to take it without a prescription for a purpose that it will help them accomplish? (I.E. studying.) Studying is also a problem that only exists in modern society and they are also using the drug to help alleviate the difficulty of this modern problem. The only real deciding factor here is possible conditions that the drug could trigger. If we assume that they have gone to the doctor and their health is in the right place in order to not get any adverse effects from the drug, is it then wrong for them to take the drug without a prescription? Is a Doctor's note the thing that defines morality with drugs? What about incompetent doctors? What about crooked doctors?
__________________
|
|
03-10-2011, 01:27 PM | #165 | ||
FFR Veteran
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
||
03-10-2011, 02:53 PM | #166 | |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New York
Age: 45
Posts: 162
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
__________________
" Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day To the last syllable of recorded time, And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage And then is heard no more: it is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. " ~ W.S |
|
03-10-2011, 03:10 PM | #167 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 25
|
Re: Drugs
Researching a drug's effects does not mean that you know how to properly use it, even with thorough research, there is still the distinct possibility that you missed an important facet. There is a good reason that they have a liscense and you don't. Saying that one can do it with nothing but independant research is akin saying that you can solve crimes because you watch CSI. You shouldn't take somebody elses prescription medication even if you have a prescription for the same medication. Do you know why? Dosages and concentraction for most prescription drugs are measured carefully and can vary wildly from person to person. These are measurements and decisions that the average person is not qualified to make.
I would like to note, by the way, that my initial comment was about the fact that one shouldn't say that illicit drugs should be legal because of a prescription medication being potentially just as harmful. Prescription medication is regulated, ilicit drugs are not. Yes, incompetant and crooked doctors exist, that's why there's such a thing as a malpractice lawsuit. In my view, it is perfectly acceptable for people to take Prescription medication for things such as ADHD because, even if it's not recognized elsewhere, it is recognized where the prescription is being filled out and it is what the drug is made be used for. Lastly, people who use prescription medication without a prescription typically can't get the prescription for a reason. If you want to take a drug such as Adderall to help you study, consult with your physician, who knows? He just might give you a prescription and if not, he can tell you why. |
03-12-2011, 12:54 AM | #168 | |
Sectional Moderator
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
1. Some people are stupid about things 2. We must protect them from their own stupidity 3. Therefore everyone is judged by the same moral code wrt drugs that protects stupid people from their stupidity 4. This is only true for drugs that don't have historical social stratification (i.e. alcohol, tobacco)
__________________
Last edited by Vendetta21; 03-12-2011 at 01:12 AM.. |
|
03-12-2011, 09:57 PM | #169 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 25
|
Re: Drugs
Are you kidding me? I am one of the biggest anti-tobacco people I know. I HATE tobacco. Also, part of the problem isn't just protecting people from their own stupidity, its protecting others from it as well. Ever hear of roid rage? Or stories about drunk fathers or mothers abusing their families? Additionally, part of the reason that people can be stupid about that sort of thing is due to all of the misinformation out there. How many people do you know who first tried drugs thinking "Hm, this might be an enlightening/educational experience" as opposed to those pressured into it by their peers or those who saw it as "cool" or "hip?"
Also, it's not very polite to quote somebody as saying something that they never actually said so as to mock them. I'm honestly expecting a bit more maturity in here than that. |
03-13-2011, 09:38 AM | #170 | ||
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 313
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
We live in a democracy, even though its a diluted fukerd up version of it, we still do. What you actually shouldve said was it would help the cause if those bunch of stoners got up off there bongs and pipes and hookahs and went into a voting booth, voted, and got it legalized. Oh and no offense to the stoners, I myself enjoy plenty of gods gift.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
03-13-2011, 10:42 PM | #171 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 114
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
Curious thing about roid rage, saw a documentary a while ago on steroids, and its been argued to be long term good for you at the expense of your gonads short term. In fact the term roid rage is actually just due to the hormone inbalance of the sudden testosterone increase which some teens may experience during puberty (subjective to people based on hormones, food, environment and all sorts of factors). Its also used to treat injuries, aids and has quite a lot of good uses. That being said, it can be abused like anything and if used properly can increase life expectancy. |
|
03-14-2011, 02:59 AM | #172 | ||
Sectional Moderator
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
Quote:
More importantly though, each of those drugs is a different drug and should be looked at specifically. We cannot bunch all of those items into the same category "Drugs" and say that all of the negative things alcohol, tobacco, and steroids do are the inherently qualities of "Drugs" as a general concept (similarly ignoring any possible benefit.) Then we are just turning "Drugs" into The Great Destroyer. So when discussing Adderall, whether or not people cannot control their rage on steroids doesn't matter one bit. Which brings us back to the original question about morality: so there does not exist a case where someone can educate themselves about a drug (Adderall) and use it for some purpose its not specifically designed for (power-studying) without a prescription (because a prescription is time-consuming and expensive to get for that narrow purpose) without this act being morally reprehensible?
__________________
Last edited by Vendetta21; 03-14-2011 at 03:01 AM.. |
||
03-15-2011, 10:16 PM | #173 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 25
|
Re: Drugs
No, but it would be ill advised in my opinion. I would seriously ask a doctor. What WOULD be morally reprehensible would be to hand them out to your friends or sell them for profit.
|
03-19-2011, 12:24 PM | #174 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 33
Posts: 1,823
|
Re: Drugs
I've actually been hooked up with a shroom connect for when I get back to Vegas. Anyone have anything to say about them?
|
03-19-2011, 02:21 PM | #175 | ||
Sectional Moderator
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
Quote:
I mean it goes counter to your intuition here: people are using it in order to get a college degree, which is about bettering their life. And if there exists a degree where 80-90% of people use adderall to study for exams (maybe Engineering at a competitive school) it begins to throw your argument here into a sketchy area. Your problem with this type of drug is that you believe it ruins people's lives. In some cases it may better their life. To submit that they must get a prescription for this drug means that they must, on top of college, be able to afford insurance that can cover multiple doctor visits and a prescription for the drug. This means that only a percentage of students can use this route because of financial restrictions. Since the drug is only needed in small quantities though, it is cheaper to buy a couple pills to prep for an examination rather than go through the expensive process of getting a prescription. If I have a prescription because my family has good insurance and I am using it to study for a hard engineering exam, is it immoral to give it to my friend who does not have good insurance and is having an equally hard time completing the exam? Or do you really believe in making morality a thing that is wielded by your income class?
__________________
Last edited by Vendetta21; 03-19-2011 at 02:28 PM.. |
||
03-19-2011, 03:03 PM | #176 | ||
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 33
Posts: 965
|
Re: Drugs
I don't think society is advanced enough to be able to handle marijuana, which I think may even degenerate or further stagnate the progress of society. It really doesn't matter if it doesn't have bad physical side effects or could increase tax revenue. I think the market is already progressing faster than society, which is bad for us, and I think marijuana would further separate the two. The reason being that marijuana tends to overemphasize feelings over thought or inexplicably infuses them; while not inherently wrong, I don't think we're capable enough yet of separating them to further blur the borders.
Which leads me to... Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Garquillex; 03-19-2011 at 03:12 PM.. |
||
03-19-2011, 03:06 PM | #177 |
Dark Chancellor
|
Re: Drugs
I could like drugs and argue that they're dumb as fuc to use
__________________
|
03-19-2011, 03:16 PM | #178 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 33
Posts: 965
|
Re: Drugs
Yup, exactly what I meant. I should have mentioned I wasn't agreeing with there being nothing to have an opinion about in regards to drugs.
|
03-20-2011, 09:54 PM | #179 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 25
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
|
|
03-21-2011, 09:39 AM | #180 | ||
Sectional Moderator
|
Re: Drugs
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Vendetta21; 03-21-2011 at 09:43 AM.. |
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|