Are Anti-Gun Enthusiasts Fascists?

[BigBrain]

Hear me out, before you shun me into oblivion, because I have the power to irrefutably convince you that the answer to this question is yes beyond a doubt.

I look out into daily life, and everywhere I see the segregation of Pro-Gun enthusiasts. Propaganda, news, friends, family. All examples of unfair accusations against the Pro-Gun movement. This great nation is required to have a firearm, our own constitution states it. Do you people really want to go against what our Founding Fathers worked so hard to achieve; independence?

The Founding Fathers gave us the right to bear arms for a reason. Who are we to decide that this amendment should simply be stripped from our rights? They want to change our very way of life with no responsible evidence. All they seek is power, the feeling of dominance they would achieve when they change the foundation of this country. What would come next? Free press? Free speech? Where could this end? Anti-Gun enthusiasts don't care about "the safety of our children" or other such arguments. Their motivation is not to keep our streets clean of crime; if it was they would simply encourage the country to crack down more on crime or gangs. No, they simply wish to drown themselves in the feeling of totalitarian power.

And that, my friends, is a Fascist.

[devonin]

This great nation is required to have a firearm, our own constitution states it.

No it doesn't. Read the actual amendment. Nobody is required to have a firearm.

Do you people really want to go against what our Founding Fathers worked so hard to achieve; independence?

The founding fathers wanted a way for a larger nation to protect itself from the potential reinvasion of the British, and protected the rights of militias for the purpose of civil defense to arm themselves. That has nothing to do with you carrying a pistol in your jacket while you go to the movie theatre.

The Founding Fathers gave us the right to bear arms for a reason.

To protect oneself from foreign invasion.

Who are we to decide that this amendment should simply be stripped from our rights?

It's an amendment, which means it wasn't in the original document. Who are you to decide it should have been -added-?

They want to change our very way of life

"They" being who? Other american citizens with all the rights and abilities to express their protected opinion about the way the country should be run? The ones whose opinion is equally valid as yours in a democratic nation?

Anti-Gun enthusiasts don't care about "the safety of our children" or other such arguments. Their motivation is not to keep our streets clean of crime; if it was they would simply encourage the country to crack down more on crime or gangs.

If you could use such a broad generalization to sweep up the streets, youd have a pretty clean country.

No, they simply wish to drown themselves in the feeling of totalitarian power.

You have conclusively failed in your stated purpose to prove beyond refutation a damn thing, except that you have no actual intention of learning the first thing about the position of pro gun-control Americans. Feel free to try again.

[BigBrain]

I think devonin is a pretty cool guy. Eh ruins my trolling thread and doesn't afraid of anything.

[devonin]

Yay, self-admitted trolls are easier to ban.