FFR Scores 2006-2010

[sertman]

By saying that you'll ban anyone that says he's bull**** you're defending him, plain and simple. And people assume that means for FFR and SM, hence the whole rant about his SM scores.

[smartdude1212]

1-1-3-2 on Balloon ;-;
ps ilu sert even if you did step JRB but posting that cancels out JRB with still more leeway so ilu

[x_Dragun_x]

[ledwix]

is this GGC appreciation week/day? anyway, nice job.

[The5thMoon]

Originally Posted by ledwix

is this GGC appreciation week/day? anyway, nice job.

Well with the added note skins, and removed 2-framers, you're going to see a lot of GGC scores . =p

[smartdude1212]

yeah k balloon pissed me off, and no ss because I'm lazy.

Also had runs like 3-1-1-1, 4-1-1-1, 0-2-3-3, etc -.-

[DanceyDanceyDancer]

Originally Posted by Slinkyyyyyy

hey dancy im guessing you play ddr or itg , your accuracy is goodness

i suck at ddr and i dont even know what itg is

[MrPubics]

Dang... if only I could learn to do framers.

[Xception704]

Hey Tass.

If you have evidence that points both that Rubix is legit and that he's a cheater, why should the evidence that he's legit matter?

I mean, if a guy plays 10,000 games legit and gets decent scores, then cheats a rank 1 on GGC, does his 10,000 games of legitness still matter? No, not really ...

Or did you simply mean that they "point" that way ... not completely solid though.

[smartdude1212]

I hope that's Bill because I will ****ing laugh if it is.

[Sprite-]

lmao mrpubics

[The5thMoon]

I think it's izlude.

[Tasselfoot]

evidence that points in both directions. as in... some things would seem to not be legit, but are theoretically possible. many many other things that would lead you to believe he's legit.

as such, no action has been taken.

ps - ban'd.

[darkshark]

I say some sort of autoplay program, which would explain uhhhh....pretty much every score he gets. Like those 0-x-x-0 scores.

[Tasselfoot]

actually, it wouldn't. if he had an autoplay program, he'd have 1 keypress for every arrow. those 0-x-x-0 scores show that he ISN'T hitting the 2nd arrow at all. otherwise he'd have a boo for it. while improbable, the lack of boos on avmisses tends to show that he isn't using a program... it tends to show that he actually has a reaction time in the .03 second range to recognize he's going to get an avmiss and intentionally not hit the 2nd arrow.

correct?

[XXXsmittyXXX]

tass Ö

[darkshark]

Originally Posted by Tasselfoot

actually, it wouldn't. if he had an autoplay program, he'd have 1 keypress for every arrow. those 0-x-x-0 scores show that he ISN'T hitting the 2nd arrow at all. otherwise he'd have a boo for it. while improbable, the lack of boos on avmisses tends to show that he isn't using a program... it tends to show that he actually has a reaction time in the .03 second range to recognize he's going to get an avmiss and intentionally not hit the 2nd arrow.

correct?

It's reading those two arrows as 1, thus wouldn't hit a second arrow, because none of us have that sort of reaction time obviously, programs do.

A while back I made a lame program using Visual Basic color detection codes that could actually "read" arrows based on when they crossed a certain part of the screen, it was an unfinished project, but it could easily fc songs like CIA Rave. Since the program ran on a loop of events that would check each area of the screen several times a second, it gave the program leeway for goods/averages, so it wasn't perfect, especially on fast songs.

You have to understand how this sort of autoplay program works to understand why it explains every single one of Rubix's scores.

[Black Yoshi]

Originally Posted by DanceyDanceyDancer

i suck at ddr and i dont even know what itg is

Itg = In the groove

[darkshark]

Wow I can read GGC now =O



Oh wtf Tass add this lol.

[Black Yoshi]

Originally Posted by darkshark

best rank 0?