TWG Turbo 35: A Small Gathering [GAME THREAD]

[XelNya]

Originally Posted by leetic

Wouldn't the seer not want to claim seer unless absolutely necessary though?

Seer should play better and not claim

[Haze with a Z]

I said I’d vote. I’m at a coinflip kinda while I wait for an explanation but zenith took the opportunity to lurk and not do anything or talk to me so I’m voting them again for that. zenith

[MixMasterLar]

Wait did I forget Zenith didn't claim Seer? When was this?

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

Am I not always like this though? especially early game? I usually get called out for this lol

I'm not gonna lie I would accept that reasoning for a D0 vote

Just maybe not this game

[Haze with a Z]

I don’t remember this claim tbh but I’m just assuming it is an actual thing

[roundbox]

Originally Posted by Haze with a Z

Round box, if the reason you didn’t like my vote was because of my logic and not you thinking I am wolfy, why did me voting put you off from voting?

it just felt odd to arrive at the same solution with completely different reasons
that + the seer idea gave me cold feet

Originally Posted by leetic

Wouldn't the seer not want to claim seer unless absolutely necessary though?

by claiming not having a night action, he threw out any legitimacy of a future seer claim
we had people doing hypos at the beginning of the thread, providing cover (even if it ultimately was futile). I feel like the precedent had been set for covering the seer, even if hypo was out of the question

[XelNya]

Hi T-Force

[leetic]

We should decide our lynch target a little early, so they can claim seer if necessary. If the Seer isn't going to be lynched, they shouldn't claim. And don't claim seer if you're not seer, it will screw everything up even if it buys you another day.

[roundbox]

Originally Posted by _Zenith_

I feel kind of lost simply due to not having any night action to really steer where I want to be thinking or looking between interactions because at the moment, interactions are simple nudges at best, couple of comments here and there and some prods where people might lean a vote.

my reaction was "I can't believe you've done this"

[MixMasterLar]

When did he claim he didn't have a night action?

Only I hypo'd, and got sussed for it from at least two different posters.

[leetic]

Originally Posted by roundbox

it just felt odd to arrive at the same solution with completely different reasons
that + the seer idea gave me cold feet



by claiming not having a night action, he threw out any legitimacy of a future seer claim
we had people doing hypos at the beginning of the thread, providing cover (even if it ultimately was futile). I feel like the precedent had been set for covering the seer, even if hypo was out of the question

A seer claim can be confirmed by the lack of a counterclaim. It's not a question of losing future legitimacy.

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by roundbox

my reaction was "I can't believe you've done this"

I think he meant because no night action has occurred in the game yet, not because he doesn't have a night action personally

[Haze with a Z]

I agree with a cop ccing I think although I can see them opting out as well. It does just get the first person voted the next day though which is outing for them

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by roundbox

my reaction was "I can't believe you've done this"

At the time I read this as him lamenting that there wasn't a night 0 proceeding the day as on other sites, as questions about what was allowed on FFR's D0 were recently being asked that seemed reasonable

I guess I see your take on it and it's pretty reasonable, but wouldn't refer to it as a claim. A slip at most

[roundbox]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

I think he meant because no night action has occurred in the game yet, not because he doesn't have a night action personally

you ever just incorrectly read a post?
fuck, I completely misread that post

[leetic]

I have claimed not to be a PR as PR before. It's a simple question of maintaining cover.

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

I think he meant because no night action has occurred in the game yet, not because he doesn't have a night action personally

Yeah this tbh

[XelNya]

I'm just gonna state I would intend to vote zenith because consensus, and information rather than a personal "scum" read

but would otherwise lazy vote lar

[leetic]

Originally Posted by roundbox

you ever just incorrectly read a post?
fuck, I completely misread that post

Anyway, that change your read on the slot?

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by roundbox

you ever just incorrectly read a post?
fuck, I completely misread that post

I get how that happened with the way it was worded lol

[Haze with a Z]

Originally Posted by roundbox

you ever just incorrectly read a post?
fuck, I completely misread that post

I think I can see it both ways. It isn’t your fault tbh