05-12-2017, 01:58 PM | #581 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
feeling heavy internal conflict about indheart because his content feels very towny but my gut thinks something tastes off from his usual towngame and i can't put my finger on what it is
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
05-12-2017, 01:59 PM | #582 | |||||
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
05-12-2017, 02:12 PM | #583 |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
soundwave hasn't posted since his last response to me, when i had called out his unwillingness to give a substantive take on haku/blind interactions
calls it "non-organic" but could see it being t/t? ...at least it's a thought? his last post reminds me of xel in all honesty, in the way xel would respond to people's shitposts more than their actual posts in multiquotes |
05-12-2017, 02:19 PM | #584 |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Tokzic do you want to expand on any of your vague statements or nah
Your posts are so random |
05-12-2017, 02:25 PM | #585 |
the Haku
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,524
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I have too much free time and I am insane enough to try to associate wolf players together without knowing a single wolf.
I'm trying to pair up players that avoid interactions, but still talk about principles and possibilities. Interactions fmpov means 1. Asking questions. 2. Developing something that is being talked about. 3. Answering questions. "I think this is t/t" doesn't count as a development. Explaining why you think something is t/t in details is a development. fmpov, tiloco/DBP/FreezinIce/Manti/Tokzic/LightKnight are all somewhat here. If I judge you don't have sufficient interactions by weighting how you play, I will wolf read you. |
05-12-2017, 02:27 PM | #586 | |||
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
|||
05-12-2017, 02:29 PM | #587 |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Doesn't the quote you used kind of contradict what you said? Manti doesn't know the setup so that could be a reason for him being a bit more reserved. Why are you so confident that he is town based on this?
|
05-12-2017, 02:29 PM | #588 |
the Haku
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,524
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
|
05-12-2017, 02:30 PM | #589 | |
TWG Overlord
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Am i mindmelding with tokzic this game or is he sponging me?
Things to think about when I am at a compiter
__________________
AAA's = 800 Quote:
|
|
05-12-2017, 02:31 PM | #590 |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Thats some good shit Tokzic yay
|
05-12-2017, 02:32 PM | #591 |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Is this a challenge ? I accept
|
05-12-2017, 02:32 PM | #592 |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I am hard claiming wolf.
|
05-12-2017, 02:32 PM | #593 |
the Haku
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,524
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I believe that inDheart is doing fine.
Fight me. \o\ |
05-12-2017, 02:35 PM | #594 |
Sectional Moderator
TGB Queen
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
How would he be sponging you? Where did you post about the same things first?
|
05-12-2017, 02:57 PM | #596 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
speaking of expanding on vague statements, can you share what posts caused dbp and xiz to stick out to you earlier this phase
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
|
05-12-2017, 02:58 PM | #597 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
xD
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
05-12-2017, 03:00 PM | #598 | |
TWG Overlord
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I need a computer to compile the multiquotes effectively. Will try to get you references by EOD
__________________
AAA's = 800 Quote:
|
|
05-12-2017, 03:00 PM | #599 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
paging lightknight to ground floor of twgopolis
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
05-12-2017, 03:06 PM | #600 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
there are at least three active wolves this is a mystery game, and it is a very real possibility there's a bunch of blue in that utr pool lynching in inactives sounds like an awful idea to me right now
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|