PETITION: Post count minimum to play J/TWG

**Snapps** · 03-9-2005, 03:06 PM

I've noticed a few people signing up with VERY low and when I say very I mean 1-20 posts.

In my opinion I can not trust people with that low of a post count to be active. We have had some inactivity before with low postcount and I think there should be a post count minimum to be qualified to play J/TWG.

evilbutterfly · 03-9-2005, 03:12 PM

I dunno, man. Some people come here and do nothing but play TWG. Any fool could just spam the hell out of the garbage bin just so they could play jTWG. I don't think post count has any bearing on activity. However, if you see their join date is a year ago and they only have 3 posts, well may be there's a problem.

**Freak83** · 03-9-2005, 03:43 PM

From what I've seen, people with high post counts have been more inactive in jTWG than people with small ones. In fact I don't recall anyone with a small postcount being inactive at all. It hasn't been a problem yet so there's nothing to resolve.

flypie743 · 03-9-2005, 03:45 PM

No, that would just make post count seem more important.

**JenovaSephiroth** · 03-9-2005, 03:50 PM

I'm kinda tied on this issue. It should be put into effect because people with extremely LOW post counts, like 1 or 2, would probably try to join and not know the rules and, in a sense, ruin the game. It shouldn't because, as you can see, my post count isn't very high but I was in jTWG IV for a bit before it restarted and did pretty well.

View Poll Results: Post minimum to play?
Yes	6	46.15%
No	7	53.85%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

03-9-2005, 03:06 PM	#1
Snapps NO DOUBT GET LOUD Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: California Age: 33 Posts: 5,648	PETITION: Post count minimum to play J/TWG I've noticed a few people signing up with VERY low and when I say very I mean 1-20 posts. In my opinion I can not trust people with that low of a post count to be active. We have had some inactivity before with low postcount and I think there should be a post count minimum to be qualified to play J/TWG.

03-9-2005, 03:12 PM	#2
evilbutterfly FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Small town, TN Age: 37 Posts: 5,784	RE: PETITION: Post count minimum to play J/TWG I dunno, man. Some people come here and do nothing but play TWG. Any fool could just spam the hell out of the garbage bin just so they could play jTWG. I don't think post count has any bearing on activity. However, if you see their join date is a year ago and they only have 3 posts, well may be there's a problem. __________________ So I've gone completely slack-ass and haven't done any work on creating games. =( In less-depressing news, I got a job for an online business (which sells non-electronic games, of all things!) which has taught me a lot about marketing online and all that jazz. So now I'm on Twitter @NoahWright. And I write the blog for their website. Plus I do cool programming in-house that you'll never see. =O

03-9-2005, 03:43 PM	#3
Freak83 FFR Simfile Author Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 3,281	RE: PETITION: Post count minimum to play J/TWG From what I've seen, people with high post counts have been more inactive in jTWG than people with small ones. In fact I don't recall anyone with a small postcount being inactive at all. It hasn't been a problem yet so there's nothing to resolve.

03-9-2005, 03:45 PM	#4
flypie743 FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: fairyland Posts: 3,210	RE: PETITION: Post count minimum to play J/TWG No, that would just make post count seem more important. __________________ IF YOU ARE THE BOMB YOU WILL CLICK THIS and if you dont, you suck.

03-9-2005, 03:50 PM	#5
JenovaSephiroth pink dragon irl Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: pittsburgh Age: 34 Posts: 828	RE: PETITION: Post count minimum to play J/TWG I'm kinda tied on this issue. It should be put into effect because people with extremely LOW post counts, like 1 or 2, would probably try to join and not know the rules and, in a sense, ruin the game. It shouldn't because, as you can see, my post count isn't very high but I was in jTWG IV for a bit before it restarted and did pretty well.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)