SM Scores 2006-2010 - Page 560

**XXXsmittyXXX** · 09-9-2007, 08:02 PM

sertman is so serty wouldnt you say? sertman <33

Bahamut-X · 09-9-2007, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrRubix

No, it is still not ad hominem. People misuse the term all the time. Just because there's abuse doesn't make it ad hominem.

whatever the heck it was that you said, I don't care what the "formal" term is, it was still completely irrelevant to what I said and attacked me instead.

Did you honestly not understand what I meant by ad hominem, even if it wasn't the specific description? Most people (atleast from what I've seen) use ad hominem to describe statements like that, and people understand what it means. As long as you know what I'm trying to say there's really no need to go into specifics... unless of course you're looking for another outside way to attack me to avoid going into stepmania (I ownder why?). You seem to like that.

ps to minimize all this retarded drama i will post scores

guess the rate

i think this is good dunno?

edit

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrRubix

This is exactly why people here suck at argument and don't even know it. It isn't that I "bring it to a finer point of English," it's just that you guys don't understand how to argue effectively without resorting to sheepmindedness, bandwagons, and controversy as cannon fodder.

good lord this guy is hopeless

lightshark · 09-9-2007, 08:06 PM

A tempest of shadowy doubt looms in the horizon.

Awesome Raba, Baha. Ya tied my misscount but crushed my accuracy. I assume you've beaten my PR combo (like mid-500). : /

**Sir_Thomas** · 09-9-2007, 08:06 PM

Shut the **** up already.

sertman · 09-9-2007, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrRubix

So what? Those three things are totally irrelevant to DDR/Stepmania skills. Correlation doesn't equate to causality, dude.

This is exactly why people here suck at argument and don't even know it. It isn't that I "bring it to a finer point of English," it's just that you guys don't know how to prove or counter points.

You're right, they aren't. I didn't intend it to correspond with stepmania skills, I intended it to correspond with the mentality of someone who fakes scores over internet forums, something that a lot of people here, including myself, have grown accustomed to seeing.

EDIT: Baha: 1.3

**cetaka** · 09-9-2007, 08:09 PM

everybody in this thread is a himalayan ho monkey

is that ad hominem ?_?

oh ps check out my awesome new profile its sweet

MrRubix · 09-9-2007, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bahamut-X

whatever the heck it was that you said, I don't care what the "formal" term is, it was still completely irrelevant to what I said and attacked me instead.

Did you honestly not understand what I meant by ad hominem, even if it wasn't the specific description? Most people (atleast from what I've seen) use ad hominem to describe statements like that, and people understand what it means. As long as you know what I'm trying to say there's really no need to go into specifics... unless of course you're looking for another outside way to attack me. You seem to like that.

The formal term isn't hard to understand. But don't tarnish logic and argument with your pathetic attempts to interject Latin terms into your argument to somehow give you the illusion of credibility, especially against someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

Bahamut-X · 09-9-2007, 08:09 PM

maybe but cetaka's cool so 'sall good

edit

you said I'm tarnishing logic and argument. wow. That's all that needs to be said.

Sorry for slightly misusing a phrase (while still getting my point across), that seems to seriously infuriate you.

MrRubix · 09-9-2007, 08:11 PM

""I intended it to correspond with the mentality of someone who fakes scores over internet forums, something that a lot of people here, including myself, have grown accustomed to seeing."

Ok, so, let's assume this "mentality" is the same? So what? You're still saying nothing. It's this type of controversy-stirring that causes so much negative light. People here are too young and simply don't. know. how. to. argue. If FFR took these type of logic skills to court or debate or something they'd be demolished.

"Sorry for slightly misusing a phrase (while still getting my point across), that seems to seriously infuriate you."

You still don't quite get it -- it's like how people somehow claim I'm not legitimate because I use phrases like "jumpclusters." Somehow that's soo indicative of BS even though it's independent of skill. So if you want me to use your FFR terminology, at least get your facts straight with respect to argument and logic. Even though the point may "get itself across."

**cetaka** · 09-9-2007, 08:12 PM

ok

what if I said, "rubix is bs because he is a himalayan ho monkey"

sertman · 09-9-2007, 08:15 PM

What I'm saying is that nearly every single person who has BS'd stepmania scores has acted like you're acting right now. I actually remember having this same discussion about ad hominem in another "you're BS" discussion. I know what I'm talking about, Baha knows what he's talking about, pretty much everyone but you knows what they're talking about because they've been in the community for long enough to know. You haven't, yet you're trying to convince us otherwise? It's not going to happen.

Bahamut-X · 09-9-2007, 08:16 PM

then he'd get really angry and start pulling out all his fallacy and logic documents

MrRubix · 09-9-2007, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cetaka

ok

what if I said, "rubix is bs because he is a himalayan ho monkey"

rofl

thank you

**cetaka** · 09-9-2007, 08:17 PM

MrRubix · 09-9-2007, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sertman

What I'm saying is that nearly every single person who has BS'd stepmania scores has acted like you're acting right now. I actually remember having this same discussion about ad hominem in another "you're BS" discussion. I know what I'm talking about, Baha knows what he's talking about, pretty much everyone but you knows what they're talking about because they've been in the community for long enough to know. You haven't, yet you're trying to convince us otherwise? It's not going to happen.

I've been in the DDR/SM community far longer than most people on this site, and I know this for a fact. Honestly, if you were in my position, and you knew you were legit, what would you do? I know what I'm talking about too, but too many people on this site don't know what they're doing.

sertman · 09-9-2007, 08:18 PM

Not in this one. Sorry but ITGfreak doesn't count.

MrRubix · 09-9-2007, 08:20 PM

Even before ITGfreak, man. ITGfreak is relatively newer in comparison. I was playing way back when DDR was born -- even way back when Paranoia and Trip Machine were seen as hard, hard songs, lol.

Edit: Again, sertman, that's like the second or third time you've made false assumptions. So yeah, I get pissed off at misinformation.

dawg4321 · 09-9-2007, 08:22 PM

lmao, try 5th grade dawg.

[TeRa] · 09-9-2007, 08:23 PM

I've been playing since first mix, as well as you have btw.

**Sprite-** · 09-9-2007, 08:27 PM

honestly. rubix you need to learn to stop arguing with people. is it so hard to ignore? you should have learned that by now.

09-9-2007, 08:02 PM	#11181
XXXsmittyXXX Anxiety monster Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Yorktown, VA Age: 35 Posts: 6,924	Re: SM Scores sertman is so serty wouldnt you say? sertman <33 __________________

09-9-2007, 08:06 PM	#11183
lightshark FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 164	Re: SM Scores A tempest of shadowy doubt looms in the horizon. Awesome Raba, Baha. Ya tied my misscount but crushed my accuracy. I assume you've beaten my PR combo (like mid-500). : /

09-9-2007, 08:06 PM	#11184
Sir_Thomas FFR Veteran Join Date: Oct 2005 Age: 36 Posts: 848	Re: SM Scores Shut the **** up already.

09-9-2007, 08:09 PM	#11186
cetaka Dark Chancellor Join Date: Mar 2006 Age: 31 Posts: 2,550	Re: SM Scores everybody in this thread is a himalayan ho monkey is that ad hominem ?_? oh ps check out my awesome new profile its sweet __________________

09-9-2007, 08:09 PM	#11188
Bahamut-X FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2004 Age: 32 Posts: 3,399	Re: SM Scores maybe but cetaka's cool so 'sall good edit you said I'm tarnishing logic and argument. wow. That's all that needs to be said. Sorry for slightly misusing a phrase (while still getting my point across), that seems to seriously infuriate you. Last edited by Bahamut-X; 09-9-2007 at 08:12 PM..

09-9-2007, 08:11 PM	#11189
MrRubix FFR Player Join Date: Dec 1969 Location: New York City, New York Posts: 8,340	Re: SM Scores ""I intended it to correspond with the mentality of someone who fakes scores over internet forums, something that a lot of people here, including myself, have grown accustomed to seeing." Ok, so, let's assume this "mentality" is the same? So what? You're still saying nothing. It's this type of controversy-stirring that causes so much negative light. People here are too young and simply don't. know. how. to. argue. If FFR took these type of logic skills to court or debate or something they'd be demolished. "Sorry for slightly misusing a phrase (while still getting my point across), that seems to seriously infuriate you." You still don't quite get it -- it's like how people somehow claim I'm not legitimate because I use phrases like "jumpclusters." Somehow that's soo indicative of BS even though it's independent of skill. So if you want me to use your FFR terminology, at least get your facts straight with respect to argument and logic. Even though the point may "get itself across." __________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY Last edited by MrRubix; 09-9-2007 at 08:15 PM..

09-9-2007, 08:12 PM	#11190
cetaka Dark Chancellor Join Date: Mar 2006 Age: 31 Posts: 2,550	Re: SM Scores ok what if I said, "rubix is bs because he is a himalayan ho monkey" __________________

09-9-2007, 08:15 PM	#11191
sertman DADALADAH Join Date: Jun 2005 Age: 34 Posts: 3,910	Re: SM Scores What I'm saying is that nearly every single person who has BS'd stepmania scores has acted like you're acting right now. I actually remember having this same discussion about ad hominem in another "you're BS" discussion. I know what I'm talking about, Baha knows what he's talking about, pretty much everyone but you knows what they're talking about because they've been in the community for long enough to know. You haven't, yet you're trying to convince us otherwise? It's not going to happen. __________________

09-9-2007, 08:16 PM	#11192
Bahamut-X FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2004 Age: 32 Posts: 3,399	Re: SM Scores then he'd get really angry and start pulling out all his fallacy and logic documents

09-9-2007, 08:17 PM	#11194
cetaka Dark Chancellor Join Date: Mar 2006 Age: 31 Posts: 2,550	Re: SM Scores np __________________

09-9-2007, 08:18 PM	#11196
sertman DADALADAH Join Date: Jun 2005 Age: 34 Posts: 3,910	Re: SM Scores Not in this one. Sorry but ITGfreak doesn't count. __________________

09-9-2007, 08:20 PM	#11197
MrRubix FFR Player Join Date: Dec 1969 Location: New York City, New York Posts: 8,340	Re: SM Scores Even before ITGfreak, man. ITGfreak is relatively newer in comparison. I was playing way back when DDR was born -- even way back when Paranoia and Trip Machine were seen as hard, hard songs, lol. Edit: Again, sertman, that's like the second or third time you've made false assumptions. So yeah, I get pissed off at misinformation. __________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY Last edited by MrRubix; 09-9-2007 at 08:23 PM..

09-9-2007, 08:22 PM	#11198
dawg4321 FFR Player Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: BC Age: 34 Posts: 1,913	Re: SM Scores lmao, try 5th grade dawg. __________________

09-9-2007, 08:23 PM	#11199
[TeRa] FFR Player Join Date: May 2007 Age: 33 Posts: 9,922	Re: SM Scores I've been playing since first mix, as well as you have btw.

09-9-2007, 08:27 PM	#11200
Sprite- HAVE ME WITH VODKA Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Long Island, New York Age: 35 Posts: 7,316	Re: SM Scores honestly. rubix you need to learn to stop arguing with people. is it so hard to ignore? you should have learned that by now.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)