03-21-2016, 05:17 PM | #21 | |
Bridge Burner
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,040
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
Second place woo
__________________
Quote:
|
|
03-21-2016, 05:25 PM | #22 |
TWG Princess
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
+1 point for replacing in, +2 points for hosting a game so there isn't a disincentive to host vs playing
|
03-21-2016, 05:29 PM | #23 |
~ お ま ん こ ~
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
is there a list of which games comprise the tally?
|
03-21-2016, 05:56 PM | #24 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
grtz on mod green blaster.
I'll add the +1 for replacement in. And DBP what do you mean
__________________
|
03-21-2016, 06:40 PM | #25 |
~ お ま ん こ ~
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
like what games were used
|
03-21-2016, 06:55 PM | #26 | |
Bridge Burner
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,040
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
One would assume only games in 2016..?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
03-21-2016, 07:00 PM | #27 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
Ive started in 2016 till the end of 2016
__________________
Last edited by Xiz; 03-21-2016 at 07:00 PM.. |
03-22-2016, 06:26 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,563
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
having my name on this implies that I'm worth keeping track of when this is definitely not the case
requesting that I get taken off this list |
03-22-2016, 06:26 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,563
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
this is still really cool tho and I'd love to see an all-star game
|
03-22-2016, 07:07 PM | #30 | ||
Bridge Burner
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,040
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
Quote:
You're a better player than you give yourself credit for.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
03-22-2016, 07:55 PM | #31 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
but not as good as Red Blaster according to the chart
__________________
|
03-23-2016, 12:54 PM | #32 |
Keepin it Real since '05
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Steamboat Springa, CO
Age: 34
Posts: 549
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
If you replace in, I dont think there should be any bonus point awarded. I think points should be assessed only if a faction wins the game.
In addition, i think that if your faction loses the game then no points are given to that faction other than the participation points.
__________________
|
03-23-2016, 01:58 PM | #33 |
TWG Princess
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
bonus points give an incentive to sign up as a replacement which is something that should absolutely be encouraged
plus it's not like the bonus will overwhelmingly tip the balance for people who replace in so I don't see the harm in it tbh |
03-23-2016, 02:07 PM | #34 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
My guess is the 13 all-stars will be the 13 people who played the most games
__________________
|
03-23-2016, 02:21 PM | #35 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
My goal is to avoid that.
What if I factor in points to win percentage?
__________________
|
03-23-2016, 02:51 PM | #36 | |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
Quote:
EDIT: I think to avoid players making the game by playing a lot, you would have to make win % a significant factor, while also decreasing the significance of signing up for games/replacing into games.
__________________
Last edited by thesunfan; 03-23-2016 at 03:12 PM.. |
|
03-23-2016, 03:12 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,563
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
have a minimum games played requirement
if you meet the requirements, determine win/loss ratio |
03-23-2016, 03:12 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,563
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
aka don't factor in amount of games played
someone with 5 wins and 5 losses is the same as someone with 3 wins and 3 losses |
03-23-2016, 03:19 PM | #39 |
Role Tide
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
I think a minimum of 5-6 games is a good idea
__________________
|
03-23-2016, 03:19 PM | #40 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread
See spreadsheet. I'm working with something that MIGHT work.
It factors in Win % to games played with total points. Hopefully by doing this it prevents "most games wins" and "play 1 game, win with 100% never play again" logic.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|