04-4-2007, 08:10 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
|
Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...11&q=God&hl=en
I just watched this video and it cleared my questions on the probability of God creating the extremely complex universe and the probability of this extremely complex universe happening through mere chance and time. Science itself rules out the chance of it happening through chance and time because the probability it too low. Please, don't comment without watching at least ten minutes of the video, because this thread isn't about Christianity, it's about the ideas and theories that this video provides. ~Oceanus |
04-4-2007, 08:25 PM | #2 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Wrong section.
I already got a good chuckle from the title, so this should be interesting. Anyway, the classic watch example is easily refutable. It's a erroneous analogy first off. The cultural evolution of watch making supports the argument it's trying to disprove. Also, a watch isn't a living system and always work the same way, where as everything around you does not. I also like how all of the speakers in this film are christian ministers or something XD I love the balanced outlook on the question. Very accurate. There is no proof for God. None; you by nature cannot provide any evidence for the existance of something supernatural. The video is good at throwing out all kinds of little catches that are attractive to God believers but are pretty shallow once you analyze them. It also misrepresents scientific theories like the second law of thermodynamics. Pretty much everything they say about scientific theory in this video is incorrect so far XD Finally, the universe and life did not evolve through 'chance'. Actually, evolution has nothing to do with chance. Not only that, noone has any means of actually calculating the probability of life arising. All of this nonsense about probability was completely pulled out of a hat. If anything I suggest people NOT watch this video because it is full of lies and deceits. This is why noone bothers with this crap any more. It's unscientific...actually, it's destructive to science and is a waste of time. If you want some truth, the big bang is a fact of the universe. The universe (the visible one ) began somewhere between 13 and 14 billion years ago in a rapid inflation, and this was observed by WMAP when it took pictures from the beginning of the universe. It can do this by looking at CMBR and old light. Evolution is also a fact. You get sick every year (or maybe you don't, but some people do) because the cold virus undergoes a mutation and changes. This is evolution in action - direct, observable evidence. This is onyl the tip of the iceburg too, really. There is absolutely nothing to support what this video is saying. All of the evidence directly contradicts these beliefs, and it would be nice if people wouldn't go around propagating scientific falsehoods.
__________________
Last edited by Reach; 04-4-2007 at 08:46 PM.. |
04-4-2007, 08:27 PM | #3 | |
is against custom titles
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
I'll watch your video later, but this wrong on too many levels. --Guido http://andy.mikee385.com |
|
04-4-2007, 09:01 PM | #4 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Age: 32
Posts: 504
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
So let's say something even more complex than the universe randomly appears and makes the rest of the universe. Hmm, that makes sense.
I have always wondered how you find the probability of life forming. Life and mechanical devices that humans make are not very good comparisons. Second Law is way off as Reach said. We didn't start off as complex as we are today, why do they always act like we were? A single cell is pretty simple, and over billions of years it'll change. Common sense holds no justification. Most things that are "common sense" aren't truly when looked at closely. PATTERNS ARE NOT PROOF. Everything is made up of the same things. The thing (depending on how small you go) all have common characteristics. Just because it is "mind boggling" lets say it is impossible to happen. Well I don't understand any of this, so I will pretend I do and point out the things I do not understand and say god created it and use the things I don't understand and which the general public has no idea about to try to convince them that science is wrong! Co dependence in cells is easily not a problem. One thing happened and then others evolved from it, therefore needing it to function. Just because they say they are not biased, does not mean the aren't. Wow, beauty itself is not intrinsic. So what, you are trained on what to thing is beautiful, that is not evidence of god... So the bible is popular, big whoop. Harry Potter is a best seller, it must be true! I am going to stop watching this now. It is extremely biased and offers no evidence of god. |
04-4-2007, 09:05 PM | #5 |
(The Fat's Sabobah)
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Due to the tentative nature science, no scientific theory is ever considered "fact."
Stop saying evolution is a fact. Stop saying the Big Bang is a fact. They are just the best explanations we have at the moment. |
04-4-2007, 09:09 PM | #6 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Jewpin, that is semantic nonsense and shows a misunderstanding of the concept. I am talking about THE big bang, as an event, and evolution, as an occurance. The 'proof' of a THEORY itself can never be put forth, for a couple reasons, but all of which are quite irrelevant to, for example, the occurance of the big bang. This is like saying you cannot prove that the holocaust happened.
If you, for some reason think that you can't prove that the holocaust happened...well, then **** off XD You see, I wasn't even talking about the Big bang theory. No, I was talking about concrete evidence WMAP has provided to show that, inexorably, the big bang did happen. I would never claim that the theory itself was proven, as it is 1. An incomplete theory, and 2. Is always changing, and 3. 'Proofs' can be left for the mathematicians and their axiomsssssssss and their little universe they create. If you're still hell bent on the holocaust not being a fact, then...we have clear evidence as to why philosophy held down the progress of mankind for a long time Also... I swear microbiology pretty much did the opposite for me. It disproved the existance of God. There is no way, given that God is all knowing and all powerful, that he would design something so poorly unless he purposely wanted to make my exam hard. Therefore I conclude he does not exist, exists and had nothing to do with our arisal, or did and is dumber than I am. He ****ed up and made something smarter than he is. Wait, that's it! I'm going to go make my own religion where Humans are smarter than God is 8) Humans will inevitably create AI that is smarter than we are, and then we will be Gods, and then the cycle will continue. That is cold hard evidence right there. PROOF. Axioms axioms axioms Now then, back to microbio ;(
__________________
Last edited by Reach; 04-4-2007 at 09:30 PM.. |
04-4-2007, 09:12 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
How can something so complex where everything, or at least many things work together be a result of randomization and time. Perhaps posting it was a bad idea, but it still brought up the concept of how everything is designed to work, much like the comparison to the watch.
What about the point they brought up about how you can't think of any new colors and humans can't think of something that does not exist? I'm onl looking for views on his video and in no way am I challenging anyone else's beliefs. |
04-4-2007, 09:18 PM | #8 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Age: 32
Posts: 3,399
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Haha, really? Everytime I watch these videos that advocate for the existence of a "god" they always bring up the point that evolution isn't observable. I remember from that Kent Hovand vid someone posted way back when he tried using arguments like "a dog has never produced a non dog". I don't know enough about the whole theory about evolution to know a way to refute this but I guess your whole cold virus thing debunks that creationist argument (assuming you have your facts right, but I've learned it's fair to trust pretty much all of what you say here).
|
04-4-2007, 09:24 PM | #9 | ||
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Age: 32
Posts: 504
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
:: Quote:
Last edited by RandomPscho; 04-4-2007 at 09:30 PM.. |
||
04-4-2007, 09:24 PM | #10 | ||
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
Yes, that is a 'fact'. Evolution is absolutely true. The only area where there is a little bit of debate is on 'macroevolution', but most of it is due to misunderstanding, since microevolution ---> macroevolution. There is no 'limit' to how much change DNA can undergo... Quote:
It's an outright farse to even suggest something like this was designed. Tell the parents of this child that God designed their baby...
__________________
Last edited by Reach; 04-4-2007 at 09:29 PM.. |
||
04-4-2007, 09:40 PM | #11 |
FFR Player
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Reach..maybe God designed their baby as a perfect child but (just a possibility) it was the MOTHER'S fault by not caring for her own body or taking wrong and/or not recommended medications during her pregnancy which could have and very well might have interfered with the baby's natural development.
|
04-4-2007, 09:44 PM | #12 | |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
It's a genetic disorder, caused by mutations in the ABCA12 gene...meaning it's God's fault. It's very rare, at about 1 in a million. Evolution causes these types of things to happen. If we had an omniscient 'designer' stuff like this just wouldn't happen. This doesn't mean there couldn't be a God. It means God is not a designer as this video suggests.
__________________
Last edited by Reach; 04-4-2007 at 09:50 PM.. |
|
04-4-2007, 09:59 PM | #13 | |
Supreme Dictator For Life
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Oh god, not this argument again. Look, there's no point debating Creationism versus Evolution.
Creationism is a part of religion, a belief system, which by definition is something that cannot be proven or disproven, ergo, if you want to believe it, fine, we can't prove you wrong (well, at least on the existence of God, the idea of Creationism is downright poppycoc.k), but don't for an instant think that you can call God a fact. Evolution is in the realm of science, a realm where all theories must be supported by empirical evidence and upon observing contradictory empirical evidence, the theory must be falsifiable. We don't know for certain that Evolution is exactly how it happened or that the Big Bang is exactly how it happened. These are the best explanations we have that haven't been proven wrong. I've studied a nominal amount of biology in my day (my roommate is a bio major so he's got my back on this), and I have to say that the evidence for Evolution is overwhelming. If we had an omniscient creator, we wouldn't have an appendix or a coccyx (tailbone, you know, that thing chimps have).
__________________
Back to "Back to Earth" Quote:
|
|
04-4-2007, 10:01 PM | #14 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Did anyone just see the segment on CNN about Religion vs. Science?
Man, it was awful. The only good part was a mini-debate, where the scientist crushed the creationist. Of course, the Fundie just tried to divert the questions and such, but she phailed. Oh, and of course, they featured Ken Ham (your favourite person, Reach =P). |
04-4-2007, 10:07 PM | #15 | |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
Scientists should be able to easily crush creationists though. There should be no creationists, because it's ridiculous. This is completely seperate from religion and spirituality, mind you. Chaz is right in that, if we're going to have the debate, people should bring up different points than what have been brought up before. More specifically, this should deal directly with the design argument rather than straying and talking about evolution vs the bible again...
__________________
|
|
04-4-2007, 11:04 PM | #16 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
I watched the first 10 minutes of your video and my only thoughts are, "who do they think they are?" They are asking me to not be biased when they themselves are biased.
Also, just because the probability is so low doesn't mean it'll never happen. I believe there is a certain Quantum law that explains this, but I don't understand it myself, so if I were to explain it, the explanation will be no better than their watch one. ~Tsugomaru
__________________
Quote:
|
|
04-4-2007, 11:51 PM | #17 | |
is against custom titles
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
Monkeys banging on typewriters won't produce Shakespeare, but that's not how the world works. The Second Law acts as a guide. If a monkey produces the correct word, it saves that word and moves on. With that direction, you bet live can come to exist! --Guido http://andy.mikee385.com |
|
04-5-2007, 12:10 AM | #18 | |
(The Fat's Sabobah)
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
People who claim that Evolution is a fact only want to push their belief on others. Now Reach, understand that I am an atheist, I believe in the Big Bang Theory and Evolution. Oh, and axioms (and deductive reasoning) are the enemy of science. Nothing should ever be assumed true. Ever. Axioms are what philosopher's use to back their claims, not scientists. |
|
04-5-2007, 12:37 AM | #19 | |
is against custom titles
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
Quote:
Saying that it's a fact doesn't mean that it's 100% infallibly true (at least, not in this context). It just means that you'd have to be a freaking idiot to not believe it. Like the example that's so often brought up in evolution debates: gravity. I think it's safe to say that it's a fact because all the evidence points to its being so. No self-respecting scientist would say that you can't disprove it, but they find it safe to say that it's a fact. --Guido http://andy.mikee385.com |
|
04-5-2007, 12:48 AM | #20 |
let it snow~
|
Re: Evolution & Darwin Vs. Creation
My last professor of science told the class that evolution is a fact, Jewpin.
He's also the founder of a major study of science now adapted by dozens of universities around the country and has many mentions of his work in the Smithsonian, various scientific magazines, etc. Whenever I talk about how evolution is a fact, I reference him. His Smithsonian exhibit (coming soon) is a MASSIVE collection of trilobites. He loves the things and keeps finding more fossils all the time. Wait, fossils? You mean, like, they don't exist anymore? You mean, like, life has changed over time? Isn't that the definition of the word "evolution"? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|