TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. - Page 22

**travman301** · 05-6-2008, 03:40 PM

Personally, I'm against the idea.

But if we don't have the player base to keep both games alive and active it needs to happen.

**DarkManticoreX2** · 05-6-2008, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travman301

Personally, I'm against the idea.

But if we don't have the player base to keep both games alive and active it needs to happen.

A week and a half left and I'll be back.

I'll also have a new game written up so stay tuned.

rzr · 05-6-2008, 04:37 PM

Well, I'm not going against Maki and Manti for hosting, lol. I'll leave it up to BDN.

pntballa18 · 05-6-2008, 09:02 PM

it'd have to be a pretty good game set up for me to vote for it over the 24 player mystery game.

or if someone wants me to vote for your game you could send me $60 so i can buy GTA and your game may sound better

rzr · 05-8-2008, 08:35 PM

Something needs to be established about the game merge or lack there of. I do not support it for many obvious reasons, however, let's hear what the council has to say.

**Makilaz** · 05-8-2008, 08:44 PM

Technically the games aren't merged at this point, so the combined host sign-up should be renamed to jTWG signups. I don't really think merging them will solve anything, but I'll wait until more people weigh in on it to cast my vote.

rzr · 05-8-2008, 08:48 PM

Just throwing this out there but if a moderator happens to edit the host sign-up thread could they please edit mine to say XLIV in capital letters because I can't on my phone.

**Makilaz** · 05-8-2008, 08:48 PM

You mean LXIV. There's been 63 TWGs, so this'll be the 64th.

rzr · 05-8-2008, 08:50 PM

Yes, sorry, predictive texting.

**Brilliant Dynamite Neon** · 05-8-2008, 09:28 PM

Just merge 'em.

rzr · 05-8-2008, 09:31 PM

Now, BDN, please take no offense to this but I do wonder, is your opinion biased because you want to host your 24 player game? Meaning, if you wanted to host a smaller game would you make the same vote?

**Brilliant Dynamite Neon** · 05-8-2008, 09:43 PM

I would vote on it no matter what game I was hosting. This is a good solution to our problem, for many reasons stated previously. If we don't have enough active players to run two 16-player games (which has often been the case recently) then one combined game is the best solution. Sure, there might be some problems when newbs are playing with hArDcOrE vEtZ, but I really don't see more demerits than merits.

Even with a huge game like mine, think about it.

Two 16-player games = 32 players that can't cross over between games = not likely to be active at all
One unified 24-player game = 24 players in one diverse game = more likely to be active.

Plus, I've tried to design my game to be as engaging as possible.

rzr · 05-8-2008, 09:59 PM

I believe the veteran players went back to playing TWG and left jTWG open to the new players it would have the same if not more efficient and productive results. The veteran players (you, me, manti, heavy, lito, meno, xplay, trav, mak, people before I joined, etc, etc) should stick to playing in a game suitable for them as was originally designed. That would leave the door open for new players to learn and grow together as the climbed a latter to playing with veteran players.

Furthermore, I have a new suggestion. I ask you guys to seriously consider it as it could be more beneficial to the game:

I propose that the player sign-ups come before the host sign-ups. I say this with logic behind it, don't worry. I firmly believe that the games would be much more enjoyable if prior to inventing the games the hosts knew how many players would be joining and who they were so they could set their games accordingly.
Again, seriously consider this, I'm not just tossing an idea out there I'm giving quality feedback.

thunderstrike687 · 05-16-2008, 12:57 AM

proposing unmerging k bye

FictionJunction · 05-16-2008, 01:17 AM

'the vets' don't play anymore, except for manti. I don't know how well everyone plays now, though. Can't say I've heard the best of things, either.

thunderstrike687 · 05-16-2008, 01:18 AM

Hey Fic I exist and so does Pnt

FictionJunction · 05-16-2008, 01:20 AM

**travman301** · 05-16-2008, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thunderstrike687

Hey Fic I exist and so does Pnt

meno_rocks123 · 05-16-2008, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FictionJunction

hi

I killed you last game because you said not to

On-topic:
I've noticed a lot more activity with the 24-player game so far. Lets see how active it is by day 5 (I'm assuming it'll last that long)

edubardus · 05-16-2008, 01:39 AM

more like, lucky last minute change of events. If I recall correctly, you sent a pm asking to have me killed if nobody else had sent a kill prior

ho ho ho

05-6-2008, 03:40 PM	#421
travman301 #swagdog Join Date: Mar 2004 Age: 33 Posts: 2,641	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. Personally, I'm against the idea. But if we don't have the player base to keep both games alive and active it needs to happen.

05-6-2008, 09:02 PM	#424
pntballa18 FFR Player Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Hossin Age: 32 Posts: 3,357	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. it'd have to be a pretty good game set up for me to vote for it over the 24 player mystery game. or if someone wants me to vote for your game you could send me $60 so i can buy GTA and your game may sound better __________________

05-8-2008, 08:44 PM	#426
Makilaz TWG Princess Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bristol, UK Age: 34 Posts: 1,094	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. Technically the games aren't merged at this point, so the combined host sign-up should be renamed to jTWG signups. I don't really think merging them will solve anything, but I'll wait until more people weigh in on it to cast my vote. __________________

05-8-2008, 08:48 PM	#428
Makilaz TWG Princess Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bristol, UK Age: 34 Posts: 1,094	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. You mean LXIV. There's been 63 TWGs, so this'll be the 64th. __________________

05-8-2008, 09:28 PM	#430
Brilliant Dynamite Neon nobody fiffers anymore. Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: 6-arrow land Age: 31 Posts: 2,440	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. Just merge 'em. __________________ ~ OFFICIALLY RETIRED FROM FFR THE GAME AND FFR TWG ~ Thanks for the memories, folks. u da bes

05-8-2008, 09:43 PM	#432
Brilliant Dynamite Neon nobody fiffers anymore. Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: 6-arrow land Age: 31 Posts: 2,440	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. I would vote on it no matter what game I was hosting. This is a good solution to our problem, for many reasons stated previously. If we don't have enough active players to run two 16-player games (which has often been the case recently) then one combined game is the best solution. Sure, there might be some problems when newbs are playing with hArDcOrE vEtZ, but I really don't see more demerits than merits. Even with a huge game like mine, think about it. Two 16-player games = 32 players that can't cross over between games = not likely to be active at all One unified 24-player game = 24 players in one diverse game = more likely to be active. Plus, I've tried to design my game to be as engaging as possible. __________________ ~ OFFICIALLY RETIRED FROM FFR THE GAME AND FFR TWG ~ Thanks for the memories, folks. u da bes

05-16-2008, 01:39 AM	#440
edubardus RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGEEEEEEE Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Scarlet Devil Mansion Age: 35 Posts: 797	Re: TWC Rules, Policies, Etc. more like, lucky last minute change of events. If I recall correctly, you sent a pm asking to have me killed if nobody else had sent a kill prior *ho ho ho* __________________ Last edited by bluguerrilla : Today at 08:51 PM. Reason: edubardus/

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)