SM Scores 2006-2010

[sjoecool1991]

Blurks


MA needs improving


Meh

[MrRubix]

It takes two to argue, bro.

And yes it is easy to ignore, but I kinda like argument

[sertman]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

Even before ITGfreak, man. ITGfreak is relatively newer in comparison. I was playing way back when DDR was born -- even way back when Paranoia and Trip Machine were seen as hard, hard songs, lol.

Edit: Again, sertman, that's like the second or third time you've made false assumptions. So yeah, I get pissed off at misinformation.

No, you haven't been part of the community (FFR, ODI) that's attacking you right now. Just because you've been playing DDR for a long time doesn't mean you can automatically sense when someone is lying about scores based on their behavior. However, because many people here, including myself, have been here for a long time, and we have seen people do it, and you're behaving like people who have lied about scores. I feel like I'm repeating myself.

[lightshark]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

The formal term isn't hard to understand. But don't tarnish logic and argument with your pathetic attempts to interject Latin terms into your argument to somehow give you the illusion of credibility, especially against someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

Don't pretend to know the psychological workings of a person's mind. He may or may not have had the intent of using that term for establishing an image of credibility. Sometimes people utilize the reaches of their vocabulary simply to make their message easier to convey. In turn, attempting to include in an argument an unreliable degree of speculation is no better than that which the speculation (in your case) entails.

But seriously, you guys need to take this squabbling elsewhere. FFR and StepMania are tainted enough as it is. The instant a controversy turns into a war of frivolous quarreling (which it indeed already has), both sides lose, as it shows that neither had the insight to realize that the ultimate reward of the debate is, quite expectedly......nothing. Really, E-drama has no merits, nor even any true victors, for that matter. It's even worse when it loses its humor, as it has in this particular instance.

In the end, the moral is the same......grow up or get out. Yes, it's the internet, but what you do on it reflects your actions in real life. This situation is almost to the point of embarrassment; we need no further shame to our generation.

[MrRubix]

I haven't been a part of FFR or ODI, no. I've been active in many other communities under different names over time, is all.

"Just because you've been playing DDR for a long time doesn't mean you can automatically sense when someone is lying about scores based on their behavior"

Right, but again, why make points about my behavior if you yourself admit this?

Repeating yourself? If you haven't noticed, it's because you're making assumptions and not making much sense with your own argument. It *doesn't matter* what I act like. Do you understand this?

[Sir_Thomas]

I can clearly prove, without a doubt, that MrRubix is legit.

A.) Shut
B.) The
C.) ****
D.) Up

[ApocalypseAp]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

retarded **** about English that has nothing to do with the actual argument

whatever lmao

Originally Posted by MrRubix

You still don't quite get it -- it's like how people somehow claim I'm not legitimate because I use phrases like "jumpclusters." Somehow that's soo indicative of BS even though it's independent of skill. So if you want me to use your FFR terminology, at least get your facts straight with respect to argument and logic. Even though the point may "get itself across."

I'm sure most people don't believe you because you posted the most ridiculous Disregard score ever -- and it's not that it's the best score -- it's the fact that the MA and the PA just do not match up.

Seriously, though. That's not the best Disregard score.

[MrRubix]

Actually they do match up, because it's a legit run. I can MA a large, large portion of the song. I get most of my Greats and Perfects in the same spots. Explain where this is wrong.

I know it's not the best score. But what does that prove?

[cetaka]

Originally Posted by Sir_Thomas

I can clearly prove, without a doubt, that MrRubix is legit.

A.) Shut
B.) The
C.) ****
D.) Up

using my newfound logical skills bequeathed to me by MrRubix i can safely say that what you have stated is ad hominem

good day sir!

[MrRubix]

hahahahahaha

cetaka I love you

[XXXsmittyXXX]

no you dont your just saying that to wing him away from thinking
your bs and make him think your cool.

[bmxant]

some terrible MA for yall

[cetaka]

uh who actually believes mrrubix's scores here lmao

[MrRubix]

huh? what I'm not allowed to find something funny? you guys are tightwads, holy crap haha

[sertman]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

I haven't been a part of FFR or ODI, no. I've been active in many other communities under different names over time, is all.

"Just because you've been playing DDR for a long time doesn't mean you can automatically sense when someone is lying about scores based on their behavior"

Right, but again, why make points about my behavior if you yourself admit this?

Repeating yourself? If you haven't noticed, it's because you're making assumptions and not making much sense with your own argument. It *doesn't matter* what I act like. Do you understand this?

No, you're missing the point yet again. The good majority of the people here that are calling you out can, can, CANtell when someone is BSing scores because they have, and let me go into further detail, seen other people BS scores. By that, I mean that they have observed the behavior of people that have posted fake scores, and over time you see the same behavioral patterns among the people who lie about scores, and again, you fit the bill. You, as you said yourself, have NOT been part of the FFR/ODI community, and therefore you cannot tell if someone who has just posted ridiculous scores is suspicious or not. And everyone seems to think that by pretending not to care, and then pretending to leave in a huff, and then coming back because they want to is new. It's not. You have a video camera. You've made FFR videos. And yet you've yet to make a video to back up any of your claims. Another trait by people who lie about scores... they either refuse to make videos because it's too time consuming (yet they have enough time to hit F5 on internet forums to repond to yet another attack) or because, "oops guess what i made these videos but i can't find my computer cord" or "man my friend borrowed my camera sorry" or whatever. If you were legit, you would have wasted no time making videos. Instead, you "left" and came back. I've seen it all before, YOU haven't.

Honestly this makes sense to everyone but you for a good reason.

[MrRubix]

Alright, I can see where you are coming from, but again you miss *my* point. Here's what I've seen so far:

"Hey make a video showing this and this!"
*does it to specifications*
"HMMM he must have cheated, what Shash and Thaor accomplish must be the absolute maximum. There's no way people can be better than this. I want a new vid showing this and this too"
*does it*
"Still not buying it... hmmmm, i call bs unless you do this too"
*does it*
"impossible, he must be cheating"

So honestly, if I am going to take the time to make videos, I'd rather people take them seriously instead of just assuming they're fake even when they're done to a billion specifications. If what I do is so BS, then let's see you make the same vid and prove me wrong. I'm a legitimate player and just because people here are sheep doesn't change the facts. "Talk during your video!" I do, and people claim it's "voiceover." "He's hiding something! It's blurry!" No, it's just my camera, it's all I got. If you're going to attack your very own specifications, explain why I should bother? Honestly, don't just reply "WHATEVER MAN," I'd like an actual response to this.

If you were in my position, what would you do for proof? I've done everything asked of me and people still act like children in response. It's incredibly rude.

[ApocalypseAp]

Originally Posted by MrRubix

Actually they do match up, because it's a legit run. I can MA a large, large portion of the song. I get most of my Greats and Perfects in the same spots. Explain where this is wrong.

I know it's not the best score. But what does that prove?

Look at tsutter's score



That's VERY nearly a FC, far better PA than yours, slightly worse MA.

Now look at Thaor's score and keep in mind this was posted October 20th, 2006



Again, way better PA than you, pretty close to a FC. MA was never Thaor's forte though. He could probably do better than this now.


Now do you see why yours looks extremely fishy?

[uselessaccount]

make a video and then we'll tell you what you did wrong wen you were bs'ing it

[Sir_Thomas]

Furthemore; Shut the **** up.

[MrRubix]

Originally Posted by ApocalypseAp

Look at tsutter's score



That's VERY nearly a FC, far better PA than yours, slightly worse MA.

Now look at Thaor's score and keep in mind this was posted October 20th, 2006



Again, way better PA than you, pretty close to a FC. MA was never Thaor's forte though. He could probably do better than this now.


Now do you see why yours looks extremely fishy?

I can see why it may be viewed as fishy compared to those scores, but I have very good MA and speed, but I am probably not as fast as Thaor, not by a long shot -- but you don't have to be the fastest to do Disregard, as I've learned the hard way. My MA goes to crap on certain spots, and so I am just assuming that I get roughly equal number of Greats/Perfects in certain areas, would be my guess?