10-17-2011, 11:48 AM | #1881 |
FFR Player
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
points should still be deducted for wrong offset
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 11:49 AM | #1882 | |
stepmania archaeologist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 34
Posts: 4,090
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
Let's see... my files got 4/5/5 = 14 4/5/5 = 14 3/4/4 = 11 3/4/4 = 11 So I guess that's 2 of 4 accepted (both the collabs lol). I don't see the point of this; we're judging what charts should be converted for FFR, not what charts will be copied into a Stepmania pack folder. I think we should all assume that stuff like two-second silence and improper offsets will be fixed before the song goes into the game, which means it doesn't affect the quality of the ending file at all.
__________________
Best AAA: Policy In The Sky [Oni] (81) Best SDG: PANTS (86) Best FC: Future Invasion (93) Last edited by qqwref; 10-17-2011 at 11:52 AM.. |
|
10-17-2011, 12:09 PM | #1883 | ||
Rhythm game specialist.
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
yeah, but it also shouldn't be the responsibility of the judges sit there and adjust for an incorrect offset. Sorry, but I second that. Besides, it says it right on the front of the thread.
Quote:
This is for ichliebekase -- she PM'd me about certain things and I couldn't fit it all back in a PM. Quote:
Last edited by TC_Halogen; 10-17-2011 at 12:14 PM.. |
||
10-17-2011, 12:13 PM | #1884 |
D6 FFR Legacy Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Age: 32
Posts: 4,342
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Fixed Amen Iraq. I'll send it once I fix Obscene. Obscene is going to take a while to fix though since there are too many minor errors for me to fix with a few hours of sleep just because I was anxious to see the batch notes haha. I'll get around to it eventually haha.
|
10-17-2011, 02:16 PM | #1885 |
plain old ugly ass dumbas
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
I'd like to point out that the first file I ever stepped got accepted pce
|
10-17-2011, 02:40 PM | #1886 |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 34
Posts: 1,837
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 02:56 PM | #1887 |
.... :.. .:. ::
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,031
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
I got 15/15 on my 2 files!!!... yay :3
|
10-17-2011, 03:35 PM | #1888 |
plain old ugly ass dumbas
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Just to clarify, I wont be able to submit Mutant Sixty Four as a resubmission next batch because of the hard batch, right?
|
10-17-2011, 03:47 PM | #1889 |
ℜ1 ステップチャート 著者
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Born a pr0. :'3
|
10-17-2011, 04:46 PM | #1890 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 455
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 04:50 PM | #1891 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 33
Posts: 6,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
I'll send fixes in a little bit. I'm just glad y'all enjoyed the 32nd wall lmao.
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 05:09 PM | #1892 |
VICES
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 30
Posts: 10,031
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
13/15 14/15 Could it be that rage-quitting stepping was a bad decision? I'm quite happy at the moment to say the least, we'll see what the future holds for more files of mine. |
10-17-2011, 06:10 PM | #1893 |
The Vast White Note
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Everything got a 10/15...
Well, I guess that's gotta be a sign that I'm getting better, but still have work to do before I hit the big time.
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 09:24 PM | #1894 |
FFR Originalbro
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 33
Posts: 8,750
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Fleeting Fantasy: 8/15
Comments: You guys should obviously know this was meant to be an old school retard stream simfile to smash in as many points possible in the shortest time. If something like Vertex Beta got accepted then this is no different. Not going to change anything, because I just wanted to see what happened Liberate: 15/15 Comments: best I could do with the repetitive song. I understand it would be better if it was cut but I'm not cutting it. If it was worth cutting, I would have cut it before sending it in. No matter though because its accepted Try To Star: 13/15 Comments: lmao why is this 13/15 while Liberate is 15/15 this is infinitely better. This is more a simfile of my recent works. Even though I still made this two years ago. Also, the gap issues were my fault. I added two seconds to two songs and didn't fix the gap. Forgot. Sorry, etc. I will take a look at some of the things mentioned in the files but I'm not sure if I'm doing any fixing. Its possible. I typically get my point out with my first submission, and I usually don't like to change my files so you get what you get. But I'll take a look and we'll see |
10-17-2011, 09:46 PM | #1895 |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
I'd bet strongly Vertex Beta wouldn't get in past today's judges.
Despite the fact it seems to be a lot of people's favorite song and file, and shows up in the most played daily list frequently. But it's not tEcHnIcAL so it would get slammed by the judges today, as you can see.
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 09:58 PM | #1896 | |
Expect delays.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montreal, QC
Age: 31
Posts: 4,121
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Quote:
I guess this has to do with our more modern take on stepping. |
|
10-17-2011, 10:05 PM | #1897 |
shots FIRED
Global Moderator, User Support, Judge
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 35
Posts: 8,448
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
Let's say that back then, Tass was the one who would make otherwise unaccepted files accepted.
|
10-17-2011, 10:09 PM | #1898 |
🥓<strong><span style="col
Resident Overseer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 7,648
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
I miss files like those, they were the shiz.
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 10:12 PM | #1899 |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
But if people enjoy them so much today, is it right that they were unaccepted prior to Tass's intervention? Wouldn't the stats show that Tass was actually correct in that case?
Just a question of motive. Is FFR here to give files that are judged with the same eye as a piece of art, or do we want files that people find fun regardless of anything else? Why are so few people determining what is fun for the millions of users this site has, especially if files that are commonly considered by the elite to be "bad" are the ones most played and frequently brought up as the most fun? I've always felt the judging process was somewhat hypocritical in this way, one of the reasons I don't want to get involved with it.
__________________
|
10-17-2011, 10:13 PM | #1900 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed)
There's already been a million debates on this before. I feel like judges are starting to get a little more lenient now than they were in the past though.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|