TWG Turbo 35: A Small Gathering [GAME THREAD]

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by Haze with a Z

If I die I can get my point across

OK I get that but is there even a point anymore if you are dead?

[Haze with a Z]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

I mean at this junction I suppose you're right

I’m almost positive you misinterpreted me but it give me less isoing to do so I’ll take it

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by Haze with a Z

Idkhere is very basic quotes but here

I see a bunch of post where he's responding to people on various points


where is the contradiction? They don't make 100% sense next to each other out of context but that isn't a contradiction

You promised me contradictions

[Haze with a Z]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

OK I get that but is there even a point anymore if you are dead?

People can vote my sr without hating how I’m sring them

[MixMasterLar]

POINT ON THE DOLL WHERE THE CONTRADICTION IS

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by Haze with a Z

If I die I can get my point across

This man was in champs

[leetic]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

SKs or wolves who don't have partners don't need to worry about partner interaction in thread, they don't need to worry about making fake reads against their partners, they don't need to worry about contradicting their partners. I think this makes it more likely for them to try to take an active role in leading the game than normal wolves who have to try to secretly coordinate what they are doing

Lar is up my butt for not actively pushing anybody but you haven't really pushed anybody either. It seems like maybe you want to keep your options open while still appearing like you are leading the game by talking a lot and asking a lot of questions

SKs have to worry about being shot, they can't be the most active or towny or it will most likely backfire. As I said, it's about making midground plays. Also, it's funny how your accusing me of not making any pushes when you were up my ass about my push on roundbox not too long ago.

[Haze with a Z]

Roleblock is optimal and then not if there is a fake claim and then killing them is optimal but oh no they argue the opposite for literally no reason besides they were already doing it

[Haze with a Z]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

POINT ON THE DOLL WHERE THE CONTRADICTION IS

Ok I explained it for you will you actually look now?

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by leetic

SKs have to worry about being shot, they can't be the most active or towny or it will most likely backfire. As I said, it's about making midground plays. Also, it's funny how your accusing me of not making any pushes when you were up my ass about my push on roundbox not too long ago.

Don't misrepresent what I said. I never had a problem with your push on roundbox. I had a problem with you constantly bringing up the seer claiming, then pressuring roundbox to claim at EOD. nothing to do with the push itself

[Haze with a Z]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

This man was in champs

Yet I am still not a good player. I get it

[leetic]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

Don't misrepresent what I said. I never had a problem with your push on roundbox. I had a problem with you constantly bringing up the seer claiming, then pressuring roundbox to claim at EOD. nothing to do with the push itself

Firstly, you just conceded that I did, in fact, make a push. Secondly, what even is your point here? Is it that despite saying the fact that I said it was best for the seer not to claim I pushed the seer to claim? Which would mean I somehow knew that roundbox was seer?

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by Haze with a Z

Roleblock is optimal and then not if there is a fake claim and then killing them is optimal but oh no they argue the opposite for literally no reason besides they were already doing it

And you think there is no way this was just progressing in figuring out the game?

"X is best of no Y, but in that case [different equation]" is not a contradiction

Be like if I said I rather have Pizza but if we're not having Pizza then I want Chinese and you calling me a lair

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by leetic

Firstly, you just conceded that I did, in fact, make a push. Secondly, what even is your point here? Is it that despite saying the fact that I said it was best for the seer not to claim I pushed the seer to claim? Which would mean I somehow knew that roundbox was seer?

I was talking about today, this phase

And yes you kept bringing up when the seer should or shouldn't claim in like 10 posts including two directly aimed at roundbox

Not saying that you knew he was seer, but saying that you are the one who kept bringing it up and threatened to vote for him if he didn't claim

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

Don't misrepresent what I said. I never had a problem with your push on roundbox. I had a problem with you constantly bringing up the seer claiming, then pressuring roundbox to claim at EOD. nothing to do with the push itself

Wait what

That was his push though???????

[MixMasterLar]

What other push did he do Raeko

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

Wait what

That was his push though???????

More like threatening to vote but yeah I guess it was a push, it pushed roundbox to do something

[leetic]

Originally Posted by mellon_collie

I was talking about today, this phase

And yes you kept bringing up when the seer should or shouldn't claim in like 10 posts including two directly aimed at roundbox

Not saying that you knew he was seer, but saying that you are the one who kept bringing it up and threatened to vote for him if he didn't claim

How is that in any way indicative if I didn't know they were seer? And if I did know, what would be the point of making them claim? Do you think that we should've just taken the risk on lynching a seer?

[Haze with a Z]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

And you think there is no way this was just progressing in figuring out the game?

"X is best of no Y, but in that case [different equation]" is not a contradiction

Be like if I said I rather have Pizza but if we're not having Pizza then I want Chinese and you calling me a lair

In that case pizza is off the plate all together.

They are saying that rokeblocking roundbox is optimal but then giving reasons why it isn’t. That’s not a whole separate plate

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by leetic

How is that in any way indicative if I didn't know they were seer? And if I did know, what would be the point of making them claim? Do you think that we should've just taken the risk on lynching a seer?

If you're a wolf you just want the seer to claim and will keep talking about it and bringing it up over and over.

At the point where you made that threat, it wasn't really a risk yet, but that made roundbox feel pressured into doing it

That's my point