07-25-2009, 07:15 PM | #101 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Damn, I swear I posted this, but I guess it didn't go through.
One of the mafia has died. Report comes at the end of day phase, so it was either emerald, rzr, or bdn. |
07-25-2009, 10:19 PM | #102 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Ruritsu
Call this a safety. But I'm wondering why you deflected from the topic of yourself being seered and suggesting seering an inactive player when it could clearly weaken the humans as opposed to helping at all. That's pretty bad play and not a good suggestion....
__________________
Quote:
♥~Chu |
|
07-25-2009, 10:22 PM | #103 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Especially when there were two active candidates for being seered...
Why not one of the other two options like AC1 or myself? Why some random inactive?
__________________
Quote:
♥~Chu |
|
07-26-2009, 12:16 PM | #104 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 479
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Quote:
Further, I didn't deflect the seer off of me, I deflected the seer off of me, you and Ac1... If you really want me seered, take it up with Sc979, and when I come back green on both accounts we'll have one less turn to target wolves/mafia. To be simple, I don't think, with this dual kill per night thing goin' down, we should be trying to hit humans with the seer. Instead, we should make our best attempt to hit a wolf/mafia and when we miss and hit humans instead, as a side effect, we pick up a human for the alliance... I'm simply saying, instead of wasting a seer on you, myself or Ac, all of which I'm not too suspicious of, we should seer on others...
__________________
=__=' My sig was 22 pixels too tall, so this is here instead... |
|
07-26-2009, 04:36 PM | #105 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
We're not TRYING to hit humans.
We want to hit wolves, but we have no reliable method for picking out said wolves. The best thing to do is to confirm people who are actively trying to find the wolves. |
07-26-2009, 05:34 PM | #106 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Putting a vote on vicc for now.
__________________
... |
07-26-2009, 05:36 PM | #107 |
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 86
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
For now, I vote for tupac
|
07-26-2009, 05:51 PM | #108 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Vote Count:
Viccica (2) - sc979, GamerShadow tupacodaman (1) - RedHerring Ruritsu (1) - Viccica Left to vote: Everyone else. |
07-26-2009, 05:55 PM | #109 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
meh, I'm pretty clueless right now other than a little suspicion of ruritsu.
Imma safety sc |
07-26-2009, 06:06 PM | #110 |
MMM WATCHA SAY
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
putting a safety on ac1
|
07-26-2009, 06:08 PM | #111 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 479
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
^Really now, a safety on the seer? Can I get a safety on Ac on grounds of blatant stupidity?
Quote:
__________________
=__=' My sig was 22 pixels too tall, so this is here instead... |
|
07-26-2009, 06:09 PM | #113 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 479
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Flaw you ninja'd me, so, screw it, consider my safety to be a vote on AC
__________________
=__=' My sig was 22 pixels too tall, so this is here instead... |
07-26-2009, 06:11 PM | #114 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
lol ruritsu ninja'd by flaw. got 5 hours left to decide who to vote for... might go AC, but not definite for now. but yea, safety'ing the detective when no one has more than 2 votes isn't too smart man
|
07-26-2009, 06:12 PM | #115 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 479
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
On second thought, screw all this noise, obviously we're all just a bit confused, and a lot of poorly thought out voting is going down, so I think we should all take a second, get on AIM and think out our next move...
That is to say, I'm loggin' on now...
__________________
=__=' My sig was 22 pixels too tall, so this is here instead... |
07-26-2009, 07:51 PM | #116 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
I already said this in the chat, but I should probably say it here too.
I don't see why a safety on sc is so dumb. Someone putting a second vote on sc is a spectacular way to get lynched. |
07-26-2009, 07:59 PM | #117 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Updated Vote Count:
AC (2) - Flaw, Ruritsu Viccica (1) - sc979 tupacodaman (1) - RedHerring Ruritsu (1) - Viccica iluswirl (1) - GamerShadow sc979 (1) - AC Left to vote: tupacodaman, Spyke_MH, iluswirl, argo15, Gun92, RawrInc |
07-26-2009, 08:10 PM | #118 |
The Paragon of Perfection
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,826
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
I'm gonna vote for AC because I've seen how he plays and it strikes me as he is trying a wee bit to hard lately.
|
07-26-2009, 08:27 PM | #119 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 204
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
I'm gunna vote for gun after sitting through that pool of ADD
__________________
|
07-26-2009, 08:30 PM | #120 |
The Paragon of Perfection
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,826
|
Re: TWG LXXXV: Blood Alliance
Is there a reason or are you just safetying? If there is a reason, I wouldn't mind hearing it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|