TWG XC: Deja Vu

[Syhto]

it's odd to refer to yourself in third person emerald

[emerald000]

Are you only saying that to feel involved in the debate or what? If you had read through the logs, you would know I have been saying the exact same thing the whole time. I haven't retracted anything, even though that might have simplified my life.

[emerald000]

Rather than making some witty comments here and there, why don't you try doing something constructive now and then?

And how the hell am I exaggerating things. All I have been doing is stating the same reasons again and again, since it looks like it takes multiple times to make someone understand.

[Syhto]

emerald

[Syhto]

is that constructive enough?

[Makilaz]

Originally Posted by emerald000

All I have been doing is stating the same reasons again and again, since it looks like it takes multiple times to make someone understand.

Your same reasons aren't enough to make up for the logs. Try new ones.

[FictionJunction]

makilaz

[emerald000]

Originally Posted by Makilaz

Your same reasons aren't enough to make up for the logs. Try new ones.

So you want me to lie? You definitely seem like not caring at all, as long as a human get lynched. I put a vote on afro for digging so much even though afro is afro, but now I'll vote for you as I really think you are a wolf. Makilaz.

[Makilaz]

Originally Posted by emerald000

So you want me to lie? You definitely seem like not caring at all, as long as a human get lynched.

No, I want you to explain more thoroughly than just repeating yourself over and over and hope it'll somehow change people's minds. If I "just wanted to lynch a human" I'd pick whoever I thought people would bandwagon off of and not bother to explain my reasoning.

I'm not a wolf, but I'm fairly sure you are, emerald.

[FictionJunction]

now this is an unexpected turn of events

[clarinet89]

Current Vote Count:
u84(0.01)-
jwcgator(0.01)-
panda-vic
emerald-afro, mak, freez, syhto
mak-fic, emerald
sc-jwc
syhto-panda

Left to Vote: u84, sc, tupac, a2p

Also, day ends in 16 hours.

[Viccica]

I don't know where the random maki vote came from but... I have to agree with your defebse not adding up at present. I will reserve my vote because I know plenty of people that speak broken English when irritated. It's a very common thing. But I [i]do[/] want to hear SOME kind of ddefense...

on my phone. Sleepy time is nao.

[Panda Express]

Warning: Irrelevent Post

Originally Posted by Viccica

on my phone. Sleepy time is nao.

Thats very apparent, Viccica.

OR IS IT.

Perhaps its all a clever ruse to distract us from the fact that typos are out of character for you!

WOLF!


... bored out of my mind writing an essay. On AIM for the next few hours. AND AND AND I found my jump drive in a jean's pocket on the floor. Yay for back to trillion @ school.

[u84]

Fiction for random Maki vote and because I feel there isn't enough information to make a valid vote.

[A2P]

Emerald

[FreezinIce]

Originally Posted by Syhto

I really enjoy the way you confronted him and spoke so logically about it, but what do you think about his response? I mean you were the one that had the conversation with him afterall. I'd like to hear your full-out opinion

I had to leave to go somewhere at the time, so i didn't have enough time to type out my opinion on what he said. Well here it is. I think that he contradicted himself a lot in my conversation with him (examples being when he said he didn't think gun being lynched was a big deal when he cast his vote for him, he then changed it later in the conversation. This is ALSO different then what he said to Afro and i quote

(11:54:05 AM) emerald3x0: and I never really think he was a wolf to start off with

He also spent the better part of the conversation trying to justify why that his vote was necessary to spark conversation and that the point of his vote wasnt to lynch gun, it was to spark conversation (Never mind the fact that gun had already done what emerald was trying to do):

emerald3x0 3:11 pm
    I simply stated the reasons of my actions to afro, then restated them, then yet again since he wasn't listening
    because it wasn't my goal to get him lynched
    god, why is that so hard to understand
    I knew I had a part into that, it simply wasn't my goal to have one in it
NEXgen33 3:11 pm
    because your vote post speaks directly the oppositer
emerald3x0 3:12 pm
    that's called being somewhere at the wrong time
NEXgen33 3:12 pm
    oppostie*
emerald3x0 3:12 pm
    *sigh* I thought I wouldn't have to say things twice to people other than afro
    well here it is again:
emerald3x0 3:12 pm
    my vote speaks otherwise because IT HAD TO in order to start conversation

I also didn't like how he kept talking as if it was absolutely necessary that he cast his vote:

NEXgen33 3:46 pm
    so basicly you picked out gun because he voted for me and decided to make up some bull**** about his behavior and then put a vote on him, which is ok though because hes nto a "confirmed green?"
emerald3x0 3:46 pm
    I had to pick out a target and make an accusation on him
    the easiest person to do that on was gun
NEXgen33 3:46 pm
    "had to?"
    you didnt have to do anything

Thats totally not suspicious at all. He then gave me this list after i questioned him about it:

emerald3x0 3:51 pm
    my options:
    1- not voting (phantom=bad)
    2- safetying (doesn't bring anything to the thread)
    3- vote for somebody with a good reason (there were nobody on my suspect list)
    4- do what I did (best thing to do I think)

Where's the "wait to see if anything develops" option?

If it sounds like i didn't like what i heard from my conversation with emerald, that's because i didn't. He didn't convince me of anything other than he had major issues since he didn't care if he lynched gun when he made that vote apparently. So let me get this straight. He made up some bull**** evidence, voted for gun to "spark conversation," could care less if gun was green or not, then comes in and cries over guns death after the fact. (Even though he showed very clearly that he could care less if gun was lynched, at least before he changed his mind like 3 times.). HMMMMMM

yeah for now my vote is staying on emerald

[FreezinIce]

Originally Posted by Panda Express

Well seeing as my first vote was of the same nature (spurring talk via a vote on Freezy pop, even if I caught some flak for it), I'm a bit sympathetic.

WAT. Your vote was a bandwagon vote. You didnt do it to spark discussion you little liar. Even Emerald disagrees with you:

NEXgen33 3:01 pm
    your vote post for gun was full of conviction
emerald3x0 3:02 pm
    which is the best way to spark discussion
NEXgen33 3:02 pm
    not really
emerald3x0 3:02 pm
    a half-made vote (or even worse, a safety) won't spark discussion at all

The plot thickens...

[Afrobean]

Originally Posted by FreezinIce

WAT. Your vote was a bandwagon vote. You didnt do it to spark discussion you little liar.

Eh.

He was doing a more extreme version of what I did, and he was probably just doing it because I did it too. I wouldn't give him too much **** unless you were willing to also direct that **** toward me.

And actually, what I did was actually "worse". He moved his vote off of you, meaning he may never have intended to keep it there in the first place, but I ended up still voting for you at the end of the day after all the bull**** with gun went down.

[sc979]

emerald

he appears to keep pools of people labeled 'wolf suspects', 'confirmed [most likely?] greens', and 'no idea'. He said that the first two were empty and that gun was, like most people, in the 'no idea' pool, which sounds like there are a few outside of the 'no idea' pool. I asked him about it and he said that it meant that he wasn't sure whether or not people were inside or outside of it [in that case they should actually be inside of it]. Obviously if he were a wolf, he'd have another pool of wolf partners which wouldn't exist if he were green. And not even the seer has a pool of confirmed greens because of the MW. Only the wolves do.

[Panda Express]

Originally Posted by FreezinIce

WAT. Your vote was a bandwagon vote. You didnt do it to spark discussion you little liar. Even Emerald disagrees with you ...

Calm doooown, there was no hidden agenda with that vote. 2 votes on someone is really nothing, it just means two people agree that you might be worth looking into. Wopt de do.

But you know what they say ... 3 is a crowd, and definitely worth considering putting up a defense unless you wanna be hanging from the gallows. Although I don't agree with how aggressive Afro is, I do think you need a decent amount of pressure on people to spark anything in this game without a rock-solid defended seer coming out and dictating.