05-12-2017, 11:40 PM | #941 | ||
Carry your failures proud
Join Date: Sep 2015
Age: 23
Posts: 644
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
also lmao when lk starts talking immediately after "oh man he's not freaking out I guess he's town"
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-12-2017, 11:40 PM | #942 |
Vice President Of TGB
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
You boppin' in and out and not giving content >=(
__________________
|
05-12-2017, 11:41 PM | #943 | ||
Carry your failures proud
Join Date: Sep 2015
Age: 23
Posts: 644
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
inb4 dumb lightnight gets mislynched again
If it happens enough we're practically obligated to feel guilty.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-12-2017, 11:42 PM | #944 |
Vice President Of TGB
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Never feel guilt
__________________
|
05-12-2017, 11:42 PM | #945 |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I love how it looks like DPB wants to give Light an out as soon as he attempts an actual good post and Light just isn't having any of that
|
05-12-2017, 11:43 PM | #946 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
I provided a decent ish target, aka InD, and he 180'd onto InD, as an opportunity to what might be deflect pressure to him while not jumping on a wagon. It's a pretty safe bet honestly. I still think InD is more wolfy than light.
__________________
,, ,_, -ー'"{ ゛ヌ ノノノノハヾ ノ li.゚ ヮ゚ノi 彡と} 猫.{つ |
|
05-12-2017, 11:43 PM | #947 | ||
TWG Overlord
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
I call wolf precognition.
__________________
AAA's = 800 Quote:
|
||
05-12-2017, 11:43 PM | #948 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I don't think there is any world were light doesn't get lynched today but I stand by Xel being the best lynch
|
05-12-2017, 11:44 PM | #949 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
the only thing that might make light better is that xel is more likely to contribute later I think
|
05-12-2017, 11:45 PM | #950 | ||||||||
Gᴇᴛ ᴀ ɢʀɪᴘ ᴜ ɴᴇʀᴅ
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 33
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
One big thing that has contributed to my lack of effort the past 6 or so games that I've played is a damaged drive to play as well as me filling in games just to fill in slots so we have an active community. There are plenty of players that I haven't played with in a long time this game so I feel like that's some incentive to get off of my ass and actually do something. It's slowly becoming the HOT NEW MEME to say "yo roundbox you should post you fucker oMg" and it's pretty annoying. I get what you're all getting at, but let me continue rambling on about myself.
I was able to contribute some effort to previous games but the problem in my ability to solve them was the fact that my efforts were heavily rooted in meta, rather than individual game performance. I tried solving games almost exclusively using meta, because it only let me look at surface-level patterns rather than the small intricacies of someone's behavior in their initial posts to their later posts, tracking their intentions along the way. One big thing that always stood out to me when I actually sat down to SOLVE games was consistency of behavior from a player. There are a few players that I've attempted to observe some consistency (or lack thereof) which will be the focus of this post. Let me get some commentary done first, though. !!HOLYSHIT!! I feel like Xiz, as a whole, is playing in a disheveled manner because of his end of the year celebrations and a move. D0 will be your only exception for a close read on you, as nothing has stood out as terribly wolfy, but nothing has stood out as town. Yes, I know you stated you forgot a gimmick, but if anything this makes me a bit worried. This post is a half-joke half-read. Yes, this may be hypocritical about the meta thing but I'm sure if there's a tone shift between disheveled D0 Xiz and his presence when actually settled will be one to note. Quote:
Quote:
Continuing on what I said about consistency, I feel like inDheart has kept a very consistent tone throughout this game. He has a very robotic tone for the most part and people might read this as emotionless and often times aloof. Quote:
I would agree with this statement. Usually when someone tries to force a narrative (which I've been guilty of before) is to arbitrarily state behavioral patterns of a wolf, and the whole INACTIVE vs ACTIVE wolf argument is one that can be easily manipulated with a wolf team and careful planning, and could easily scream nastiness when one of them tries to force this narrative onto other players. Notice how Tokzic later justified his statement about "post big, then drop off" with just a few list of names. He's sticking to a behavioral pattern in general, rather than looking at those player's posts specifically and trying to find something. It's a cheap way to force a "good" perception on the game. Tokzic has otherwise been fairly towny to me, but I would nominate him as a very good candidate for a deep wolf. He's playing with an enthusiasm that I haven't seen in some time. Maybe it's the weed, but I would strongly encourage any investigative ability to look into Tokzic. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Consider this my CONTROVERSIAL READ OF THE DAY: tiloco scummy. |
||||||||
05-12-2017, 11:45 PM | #951 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2017
Age: 29
Posts: 444
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
votecount:
lightknight (3)- inDheart, Lar, DBP Lar (1)- blind soundwave (1)- Manti mellon (1)- FreezinIce Freezin (1)- Xiz DBP (1)- Tokzic Xel (1)- tiloco DBP (1) - Lightknight unvote (3)- Celirra, Haku, Xel
__________________
TWG Stats: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing FFR is a pretty good place somehow. |
05-12-2017, 11:45 PM | #952 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Xel lynch seems more like a meta read than a content based read.
__________________
,, ,_, -ー'"{ ゛ヌ ノノノノハヾ ノ li.゚ ヮ゚ノi 彡と} 猫.{つ |
05-12-2017, 11:45 PM | #953 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Thank you Soundwave.
I can only provide what I feel is true. It's true that dabackpack is coming down hard on me, and that could be because he is either genuinely curious to my playstyle, or he is already aware and that he wants to use it as a picking point to accuse me of being a wolf. I've played with backpack for a few games now, and the meta I get from him is that he is often a player with an internal ambition that's often hidden behind an amicable approach from a town perspective. This is the root of my uneasiness. I also feel like MixMasterLar is doing the same thing, and looking for the next easiest excuse to push for a lynch. |
05-12-2017, 11:46 PM | #954 | ||
TWG Overlord
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
Not sure this works in reverse.
__________________
AAA's = 800 Quote:
|
||
05-12-2017, 11:48 PM | #955 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
That's a fair call; would you be against an InD (also I almost feel bad about this abbreviation of his name) lynch though?
__________________
,, ,_, -ー'"{ ゛ヌ ノノノノハヾ ノ li.゚ ヮ゚ノi 彡と} 猫.{つ |
05-12-2017, 11:48 PM | #956 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
Quote:
__________________
,, ,_, -ー'"{ ゛ヌ ノノノノハヾ ノ li.゚ ヮ゚ノi 彡と} 猫.{つ |
|
05-12-2017, 11:48 PM | #957 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
oh shit lightknight going on dbp
big if town
__________________
Last edited by Tokzic: Today at 11:59 PM. Reason: wait what |
05-12-2017, 11:49 PM | #958 |
Gᴇᴛ ᴀ ɢʀɪᴘ ᴜ ɴᴇʀᴅ
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 33
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I'm gonna meta read Celery as TOWN for keeping consistency across games. As someone who has openly admitted to never being a wolf (and me reading him very correctly in the last turbo, a game I was actually trying in), I feel like he is playing to his standard this game.
I think I forgot to state a quick few things about Freezin last post that make me feel he is pretty much always town from my POV and relates to my concept of consistency. Freezin's anger/abrasiveness started off at a low boil (telling MML to go "drink a glass of water") and has escalated into what you see now. His consistent aggression is of notice, and I don't think anything is necessarily out of place. A shower thought made me recollect why Freezin is so concerned on the flimsy T/T reads that people are providing is because of something he said in the postgame of our previous bigTWG. He stated that getting into an open argument in thread seems to almost always get you townread, which he admitted was a strategy he used as a wolf to get some town cred. His partners were able to easily townread him by piggybacking off of this "hey a wolf wouldn't be this obvious and get into a fight, so this interaction MUST be t/t" logic which seems to pervade in FFR's analysis of common threads. Freezin being increasingly skeptic of this tactic being used to manipulate people is more along the lines of towniness, far from any "I'm gonna be a dickish wolf so I can distance myself from everybody" strategy. Also, the Persona 5 thing LUL |
05-12-2017, 11:49 PM | #959 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
I'm going to leave my vote on DabackPack, because I feel that I'm being pushed against strongly, and that it's a deliberate move coordinated by the wolves to pile votes onto me. I'm not saying for sure that dabackpack is a wolf, only that he is a catalyst in a mislynch, if you guys choose to lynch me. I honestly don't have more to provide than this.
|
05-12-2017, 11:50 PM | #960 |
Gᴇᴛ ᴀ ɢʀɪᴘ ᴜ ɴᴇʀᴅ
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 33
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed
tiloco
arm wrestle me, fuckers |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|