12-21-2007, 06:42 PM | #1 | |
FFR Player
|
FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
Do you guys think there will be more speedmods on FFR3?
Well i hope =|... We should add Cmods on FFR3 or something >.<
__________________
Quote:
HAHAHA XD I do n_n XDDDD :O |
|
12-21-2007, 07:07 PM | #2 |
Vice President Of TGB
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
x1 2 3 are cmods. ffr x1 is c300 x2 would be c600. so uh yeah...
__________________
|
12-21-2007, 07:23 PM | #3 | |
plain old ugly ass dumbas
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
I think the range of Speedmods should vary more.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-21-2007, 10:47 PM | #4 |
caveman pornstar
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
We need 2.25 and 2.5.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IREnpHco9mw |
12-21-2007, 10:48 PM | #5 |
<<Insert Title Here>>
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
Age: 34
Posts: 1,436
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
Would people use all of those speedmods though? Most people are just fine with x1.25 or x1.5.
|
12-22-2007, 12:24 AM | #6 |
Forum User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 529
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
I think x1.50 and x1.75 are the most widely used. Honestly, I think people would set it something to x1.68 and think they are having an easier time than x1.75 when in reality, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway. Not to mention that, on 30 FPS, I doubt you could even make such minute changes.
|
12-22-2007, 12:27 AM | #7 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: N.C.
Posts: 459
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
I'm not most people...
I want a 2.25... Playing on 2.0 isn't what it used to be... |
12-22-2007, 12:46 AM | #8 |
Giant Pi Operator
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
screenshrink with 2.0 then. it's not that hard. i had screenshrink down to a science a while ago. a small notch above hiding the text of the difficulty rating was my shrink.
|
12-22-2007, 12:50 AM | #9 |
★★★★★
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
we don't need 3.0 anyways.
|
12-22-2007, 12:03 PM | #10 |
cohoooooon
|
Re: FFR Lacks Speedmods =[
I need 3.0x from time to time.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|