11-15-2006, 10:30 PM | #141 |
auauauau
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Hahahahhahaha
You ****ers, you're way too much of pansyass bitches. THINK ABOUT IT FOR ONE ****ING MINUTE. The chances of the wolves coordinating for an attack on a fellow wolfmate in hopes that the guardian will guard him are SO SMALL. It's been done before, BUT STILL. RIDICULOUSLY SMALL. ESPECIALLY ON NIGHT ****ING 2. SECONDLY, you pussies need to learn that YOU HAVE TO TAKE RISKS IN THESE GAMES. And with enough lack of information in this game as it is, we could REALLY use a unified Blue Ring going on here. And since this post will obviously be scrutinized (I don't even knwo what that word means, but it sounds like the right word), don't let any wolfyness on my behalf make Hans look wolfy. BLUES NEED TO GO TO HANS. |
11-15-2006, 10:33 PM | #142 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
I wasn't saying it was a self-wolfing, but if there's an illegal wolfsbane role or something out there, it would explain why no one else came out before him. Also, one of the more inactive players could have been guarded.
JUST EXPLORING THE POSSIBILITIES. I STILL TRUST HIM.
__________________
l WWii║iiiiiiii▫ ╔═╗ ╠═╗ ║ ╚═╝ ║lll║ ║ OH LOOK NOW THE REST OF MY MUSIC IS NOW VISIBLE HOW COINCIDENTAL IS THAT |
11-15-2006, 10:39 PM | #144 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
day is up.
vash matt and nija are out of the race as well. counting the polls.
__________________
|
11-15-2006, 10:51 PM | #145 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
check that, i'm leaving nija in because of extenuating circumstances, and he did post once.
__________________
|
11-15-2006, 11:02 PM | #146 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
chromer gets the axe.
it's night 3, get me PM's ends thursday at midnight.
__________________
Last edited by FoJaR; 11-16-2006 at 02:02 AM.. |
11-16-2006, 03:39 AM | #147 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
2.talisman (stressreliefball)
5.iggymatrixcounter (iggy911mc) 6.hanssky (notsofaroff) 7.jurseyrider734 (imjurs) 8.stoicroivas (stoicroivas) 9.wilkin (Wilkini Evili) 11.hitheycallmegod (HiTheyCallMeGod) 12.DiscoBobbyParanoia (DBP TWG) 13.nijatwo (RebelNija) 16.xobserverx (xTried N Truex) 17.omeganitros (OmegaNoxim) 18.guidohunter (ElSoyokaze)
__________________
|
11-16-2006, 05:15 PM | #148 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 454
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Okay guys, I'm back from my power outage. So what's up?
Wait, I'm dead? Oh. Okay. |
11-16-2006, 06:26 PM | #149 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
okay apparently vash had net outage too, so i'm giving him a break. i did notice that he was never on AIM, but seriously, this ish has to stop.
__________________
|
11-16-2006, 11:18 PM | #150 |
The Worst
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
BREAKING NEWS: SENATOR PETPRO TAKES 50% OF THE VOTE IN THE OHIO PRIMARIES
There was a clerical error with the ballots in Ohio yesterday. Senator Petpro (R, Utah) was left on the ballots, despite his withdrawl from the race the day before. In a surprise showing of strength he took 50% of the vote, an alarming number, especially for someone who took less than a percent in New Hampshire. It is still unclear whether Senator Petpro will decide to re-enter the race. IN OTHER NEWS Senator StoicRoivas (R, Kentucky) shown here: is now being indicted on charges of child molestation, rape, and forcible sodomy with a minor. He has announced his withdrawl from the race. IT IS NOW DAY 3. YOU HAVE UNTIL SATURDAY AT MIDNIGHT. POST TWICE OR GET THROWN OUT. EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES ARE UNDERSTANDABLE, BUT IF YOUR INTERNET HAS GONE OUT BEFORE, GO SOMEWHERE ELSE TO POST IF YOU HAVE TO. 2.talisman (stressreliefball) 4.vashthestampede0987 (pyro31191) 5.iggymatrixcounter (iggy911mc) 6.hanssky (notsofaroff) 7.jurseyrider734 (imjurs) 9.wilkin (Wilkini Evili) 11.hitheycallmegod (HiTheyCallMeGod) 12.DiscoBobbyParanoia (DBP TWG) 13.nijatwo (RebelNija) 14.petpro32 (petpro35) 16.xobserverx (xTried N Truex) 17.omeganitros (OmegaNoxim) 18.guidohunter (ElSoyokaze)
__________________
Last edited by FoJaR; 11-16-2006 at 11:21 PM.. Reason: bolding |
11-16-2006, 11:37 PM | #151 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Hi, my name is WTF.
__________________
Come Play The Werewolf Game! |
11-17-2006, 12:28 AM | #152 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
didn't see that one coming :\
heres the votes i got: Observer for Chromer Talisman for Guido I was a no vote cause i wasn't home in time That's all i've got for day 2 votes. |
11-17-2006, 05:24 AM | #153 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Okay, I spent a bit of last night responding to IMs that got sent to my phone with iggy and observer, they made this seem ALOT more ****ed up than it is.
Basically it seems like petpro is the third party and the 50% is something to do with his win condition. I don't really know what to say or do to combat that, but it's what I hate to offer to the cause. As far as stoic, I already knew he touched children, everyone in my family does. |
11-17-2006, 05:36 AM | #154 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Forgot to say this:
Another thing I was thinking about last night is this: Stoic came out as a role that knew the number of 'non republicans'. This whole game I've been pretty sure that (because of the outstanding number of blues) there are 4 wolves and one third party candidate. What if stoic made that number up and it's really 6? or 7? That would make him a third party along with petpro and his death could mayhap have something to do with the '50%' thing. it's all far out there, and stoic did vote petpro in the beginning, but we have NO CLUE what the third party's win condition is, so anything is really possible. Okay I JUST noticed that is says 'R' after their names. I'm going to go ahead and assume that it'd say that no matter allignment. |
11-17-2006, 05:49 AM | #155 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Fojar, count all these as one post, I'm a ****ing retard.
Talis voted for guido Iggy voted for chromer Observer voted for chromer Stoic voted for Mattc16 DBP voted for mattc16 Here's why I voted for matt: After mini died, I put my vote on wilkin and had to get off the computer (went to sleep). stoic called me like a half hour later and told me to take my vote off of wilkin because he got 'cleared'. He couldn't tell me details, and honestly I didn't really care. I then got on and voted for matt because I knew he was going to die anyways and I didn't want my vote to affect anything since I hadn't done any research. I sent stoic a pm saying 'I changed to matt, night' becuase I didn't feel like calling him back. And yes, that's a crappy reason on my part, but at least I explained myself (not everyone did last round, and I'm assuming they wont this round.) There's my reasoning, the rest of you: get to it. |
11-17-2006, 06:57 AM | #156 |
auauauau
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
I am very, very confused by the whole petpro thing.
I mean like. He's DEAD, Jim. He's DEAD. So I guess has some kind of...like....Ressurection role...? God, this is so confusing. |
11-17-2006, 07:41 AM | #157 |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
I'm really glad you posted, this would have been my 4th in a row.
I've been thinking about this, and.. if this is anything like a real election (which it's seeming like it is) If petpro has 50% of the votes, he's almost to majority, and that means he almost wins. If petpro wins we all lose; that's how an election works I think that it is VERY improtant that if petpro comes back we get rid of him. |
11-17-2006, 10:50 AM | #158 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Quote:
About my death... See sig.
__________________
Like the moon over the day, my genius and brawn are wasted on these fools. ~Haiku -Bowser |
|
11-17-2006, 11:13 AM | #159 | |
FFR Veteran
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Quote:
A third party would most likely be an illegal role type deal. I confirmed this with fojar that if you even hint at what your illegal role is, you die. So if stoic was lying, he had to lie about something completely different and, in no way, related to his actual role. Besides, YOU (disco) were the one that pushed for petpro in the first place. If stoic was connected to petpro in the way that you think, he would have pushed for him. I asked a few people who they voted for so maybe I can complete this list: 2.talisman = guido 4.vashthestampede0987 = ? 5.iggymatrixcounter = chromer 6.hanssky = matt 7.jurseyrider734 = matt 8.stoicroivas = matt 9.wilkin = stoic 11.hitheycallmegod = none 12.DiscoBobbyParanoia = matt 13.nijatwo = ? 16.xobserverx =chromer 17.omeganitros = none 18.guidohunter = hans That's what I have, and since fojar killed matt before votes were tallied up, it seems that all those matt votes didn't count thus leading to the chromer kill. Really, the only reason I picked chromer was because I wanted someone that posted twice, but didn't really do much to help everyone else. Kind of an active but inactive type deal. Things that need to happen: @hans: drill the crap out of whoever came to you as a guardian. They are responsible for stoic's death. There's really no excuse for that at all unless I'm missing something here. @disco: you need to figure out something. I'm voting for you today if you don't give me the whole story for petpro. I'm not going for petpro since I think his ressurection and win conditions require him to die again. (At least that's what happened before) @petpro: you better have a good reason why you're alive too. @vash and nija: I need to talk to you guys asap. PM me with the full story of how you got back into the game. I'm going to compare voting patterns for the past two days. Probably be talking with some people too. I also think that there should be more discussion of who needs to go. One person was mentioned day1 and they died, a couple people were mentioned yesterday, and I know an alliance leader told you one guy, but if the wolves were smart yesterday, they could have EASILY lynched stoic if they put ONE vote on him. (assuming wilkin already isn't a wolf since he voted him XD) Voting matt was a stupid plan because it left the REAL lynch up to two people. So no more voting for people who are already going to die. That should get some type of ball rolling for now. EDIT: list wasn't right, should be correct now. Last edited by iggymatrixcounter; 11-17-2006 at 11:28 AM.. |
|
11-17-2006, 11:37 AM | #160 |
Resident Penguin
|
Re: TWG XXXVIII: THE RACE FOR THE PRESIDENCY
I voted guido, not matt. I kinda made the vote in a rest stop in iowa (no joke) since I forgot to do it at school, so it was kinda rushed. But essentially I read that post where he sort of tacked on some suspicion on hans (which may or may not be unfounded at the time), and thought it sounded a bit wolfy. That and when he's human, he tends to make just one or two long thought out posts, not one or two short paraphrases of what other people have said. All that said, that could just be due to his not really wanting to play this game in the first place and all that.
Anyway, stoic died, which means he wasn't guarded, which means the guardian must have guarded hans instead, which means that the guardian must have guarded hans before, which means hans is that much more legit, correct? Still a remote possibility, I suppose. I say re-form the alliance around him. --And at this point iggy IMs me and basically makes my entire post obsolete... saying that he corrected the guido/matt thing and that stoic already had a replacement in mind. So finally, on petpro. If petpro self-resurrected, that's sketchy as hell. If someone resurrected him, that's even weirder. I'm not quite sure how we know that he's an independent... I guess I'm out of the loop there. But if that is indeed the case that he wins only if everyone else loses (talk about a hard role, first of all), then it seems that at this point he would probably want to work with the wolves (as there are more humans alive than wolves), and we should eliminate him. If all of that is not true, aka he's not an independent and doesn't have those win conditions, then I don't know what to do about him. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|