01-1-2014, 02:47 PM | #7981 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 13
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
This is the first batch I've ever submitted to. This long of a wait is normal right? RIGHT?
__________________
|
01-1-2014, 02:58 PM | #7982 |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Since FFR apparently can't handle 4 judges per group, 3 might be something to look at instead.
Either that or split it up more. 4 groups, 3 judges per. Hell I dunno I'm spitballing here.
__________________
|
01-1-2014, 03:00 PM | #7983 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
I still think we should do a system where someone submits, puts it up somewhere so Judges can take a look at it at their own pace and have some non-judge feedback as well.
idk tho |
01-1-2014, 03:15 PM | #7984 | |
TWG Chaos
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Quote:
Here is a random new judging system idea: - Have your full judging team of 12 or whatever - They can judge files whenever they want at their own pace - Every time a file is submitted it is put in the list and available for download via cloud for judges only. - A file needs 4(ish) judges to be passed / accepted or whatever. The files might need to be judged in order of submission? File Name Here (4/4) - 8/7/7.5/5 Other File Here (4/4) - 6/5/5/5 Here is another file (3/4) One more file (3/4) Files lol (2/4) Yet Another Fiiiile (0/4) Really crappy file by Fission (0/4) *(#/4) represents judges who have judged the file so far - Final ratings will be posted in OP only after all ratings are in - There could be two different groups, but I'd say no more then that. - That way, you can have the lazy judges judge whenever they feel like it, and the judges who actually do their job keep on trucking like the badasses they are (Tell me why this wont work, or why it would. I'm actually curious to know how badly this sucks, or how it might be something to work off of lol) TL;DR: Chart by chart judging system
__________________
Last edited by Xiz; 01-1-2014 at 03:31 PM.. |
|
01-1-2014, 04:03 PM | #7985 |
good hot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Carolina
Age: 29
Posts: 5,309
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
57/60 charts judged, getting there.
__________________
|
01-1-2014, 04:16 PM | #7986 |
no
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 33
Posts: 1,850
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
|
01-1-2014, 04:18 PM | #7987 |
VICES
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 30
Posts: 10,031
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
ziz went in
also i found you in ffxiv |
01-1-2014, 04:23 PM | #7988 |
Administrator
User Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 29
Posts: 3,902
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
|
01-1-2014, 04:26 PM | #7989 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
I dig the idea, still think there should be something so the public can look it over and give their own opinions (good or bad opinions). That way, judging is encouraged by non-judges so other judges can look over and go "ya know, this guy might know his/her stuff, lets look at them for a bit."
|
01-1-2014, 05:13 PM | #7990 |
Stuck in the past
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Age: 28
Posts: 1,168
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
There should be a way we could just streamline the whole process.
Only problem with the stated method would be only some of the judges would contribute more often than others, unless there was a cycle where every so often some of the judges would get a break from judging and other judges would step in. This could create its own series of problems however. |
01-1-2014, 07:02 PM | #7991 |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,859
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
No one cares what the public thinks this isnt somr stepidol bullshit this is real life
__________________
|
01-1-2014, 07:03 PM | #7992 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
tell it like it is
|
01-1-2014, 07:44 PM | #7993 |
The Doctor
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,145
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
I submitted my file for the batch in July right after they sent the previous batch 20 files early for the tournament.
|
01-1-2014, 07:46 PM | #7994 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
|
01-1-2014, 08:25 PM | #7995 |
FFR Simfile Author
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,195
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Thanks to whoever updated the FPP, still a couple of things tho:
-Some hard batch files still queued -hb sap
__________________
|
01-3-2014, 03:37 AM | #7996 |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Seriously though.
Can we at least get an update? Some confirmation that the judge team is still all alive?
__________________
|
01-3-2014, 06:16 AM | #7997 |
Stuck in the past
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Age: 28
Posts: 1,168
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
.- .-. . - .... . .--- ..- -.. --. . ... ... - .. .-.. .-.. .- .-.. .. ...- . ..--..
lets see if they understand that |
01-3-2014, 06:39 AM | #7998 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 26
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
Are the judges still alive?
__________________
https://soundcloud.com/aquellex/crystal-chamber-combustion |
01-3-2014, 06:45 AM | #7999 |
D7 Elite Keymasher
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,337
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
.-._.-.
|
01-3-2014, 07:28 AM | #8000 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,205
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2
every time you complain the batch notes get delayed another hour
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|