08-27-2016, 02:34 PM | #21 |
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: CCQ
Actually several of the lets say "technically correct" threads -were- left open/reopened/undeleted at the same time all of that happened. They were locked as a mass-action to stop the spam long enough to figure out what was going on, and then several were reopened/put back so there's that.
A bunch of activity is fine, a bunch of spammy nonsense isn't activity, it's spammy nonsense. |
08-27-2016, 02:40 PM | #22 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: CCQ
Misunderstood your post.
__________________
Last edited by Charu; 08-27-2016 at 03:08 PM.. |
08-27-2016, 10:47 PM | #23 | |
Role Tide
|
Re: CCQ
Quote:
I agree that your case of this thread with "yo" being the title and "sup" being the OP is not something that is ok, but the reason of "Just make a random thought for this, you'll get a similar experience to one of making a thread" just isn't true anymore.
__________________
|
|
08-28-2016, 12:06 AM | #24 | |
shots FIRED
Global Moderator, User Support, Judge
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 36
Posts: 8,448
|
Re: CCQ
Quote:
|
|
09-1-2016, 03:00 PM | #25 |
FFR Hall of Fame
|
Re: CCQ
No matter how much people grow up bitching and moaning about forum rules will never change
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|