![]() |
#241 |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
![]() |
![]() Also all I said was I was going to pick between inactives.
When the fuck did that turn into "Lynch Pearl" It smells of ulterior motives if you ask me, and while Charu first mentioned anti pearl, it's InD's vote that smells the worst |
![]() |
![]() |
#242 | |||
Unacceptable
![]() Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 208
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*** Having said that, I also STRONGLY disagree with the idea of only announcing info given observable effects. Any blue roles expire at the end of each phase, and everyone can request a role/non-role again that same night. Thus, one's green or blue status is not fixed, and a roleclaim the next day doesn't make a player any more likely to be targeted in the future, since all roles are fluid. Therefore, anyone and everyone that has a role should absolutely claim what they did the next day--it provides information without enabling wolf sabotage (since the next set of requests would have already been made) or making the claimant a more likely target. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#243 | |
TWG Overlord
![]() |
![]() Both you and indy have indirectly/directly presented an avenue to remove a player from the game not due to content or fact or rationale. You have both said the equivalent of “let’s lynch antiperal because he’ll be a no show. This feels like an attempt to powerwolf through a weak town player.
What worries me more is that people think it might be a decent idea. If I read correctly we don’t get cardflips, so not knowing antipearl’s alignment when he dies gives us nothing and no one to blame on either side. It’s a waste of a day phase pursuing it and simple feels wolf driven. I like sytho because she felt similarly about your cagey “I’ll lynch anyone under 5 posts post” And I have all sorts of different feelings on sunfan right now, I like his current position on pearl, but that read could vacillate somewhat wildly as the game progresses depending on what pearl does or doesn’t do.
__________________
AAA's = 800 Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#244 |
Unacceptable
![]() Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 208
|
![]() Actually, I can see how that could potentially backfire. I would say that, assuming they exist, investigations and informational abilities should absolutely be announced, roleblocks and/or protection announced if it seems relevant. Passive abilities would probably be more situational.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#245 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
![]()
I take full responsibilities for wanting this to happen. I don't trust their slot regardless of their alignment, and that's the absolute truth. Like right now, they have, once again, proven to me that they're not going to play again. They did though play seeing as how they're still in the game by sending SOMETHING to the host.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#246 | |
Snivy! Dohoho!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
![]() Quote:
If they do come out of hiding and actually play, it'll be, at most, one post, and the rest would be about lamenating about how they're being targeted as an inactive. Source: Read this game and look for Anti-Pearl's posts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#247 |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,859
|
![]() Wouldn't it benefit the wolves more keeping antipearl around rather than just going for an easy d1 lynch? I was always under the assumption that trivial players are better to keep around because in later games a mislynch is harder to go by if you have solid towns remaining.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#248 |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,859
|
![]() Also hi rb thank u for noticing me ^~^
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#249 |
Confirmed Heartbreaker
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 35
Posts: 5,859
|
![]() mml suck on that nerds
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#250 | |
Snivy! Dohoho!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#251 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
![]() Oop, that was the wrong game
|
![]() |
![]() |
#252 |
Snivy! Dohoho!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#253 | ||
BuMP it
![]() |
![]() Yeah, I am not comfortable with this anti-anti-pearl continuation from previous games. If he is going to get in trouble for lack of posts, I say let that happen and play out as it will. It is way too easy for the wolves to off anti-pearl with no need to worry about flips showing any association with one another.
Sure, inactivity has been an issue recently with a number of players. But eh, I would rather read based on what is actually happening than to eliminate those who aren't up to par with participation. At this point. I only ever used to play games with no cardflips... so this is pretty normal to me. One of the reasons I wanted to play. Anyone who is jumping on anti-pearl I am pretty weary of. I agree with manti though, that sunfan could go either way.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#254 | |
Snivy! Dohoho!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 6,161
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#255 | ||
BuMP it
![]() |
![]()
Yes, lmao
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#256 | |||
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
![]() |
![]() Quote:
What the fuck are you going on about? I'm against claiming btw since that looks to be in question. Quote:
You 're wrong tho. Quote:
I fucking refuse to get to final five with 4 inactives |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#257 |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
![]() |
![]() Everyone with that "let the host replace them" shit:
GAME TOOK FOREVER TO FILL THERE ARE LIKELY NO REPLACEMENTS READY YET THIS IS SUCH A BAD POINT TO ANGLE SHOOT WITH |
![]() |
![]() |
#259 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2017
Age: 29
Posts: 444
|
![]()
oh man this one is worth 2 bingo spaces
__________________
TWG Stats: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing FFR is a pretty good place somehow. |
![]() |
![]() |
#260 | ||
BuMP it
![]() |
![]() Yeah... I mean I don't disagree that it is fucking ridiculous that anti-pearl is so inactive. But 1 the host allowed it, fully aware it had been a problem. 2 you cant deny that now may not be the best time to get rid of them, when it is possible still there could be a sub. You don't know that he won't be replaced. And we don't know if he won't show up yet still either...
They do know the game is on though right? Who else is super inactive atm? What is with the 4 inactives bit?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|