03-11-2020, 05:56 PM | #1421 | ||||
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 47
Posts: 1
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
catching up now
Quote:
Quote:
will the doc protect them tonight leaving them open tomorrow or leave them open tonight thinking that there's no way the wolves attack tonight. even if they gamble wrong, they still keep del's info minimal by not letting his action occur. Quote:
Quote:
i, sheeping his read, took a potshot at her. after reading dora's work, i think that - if i popped a vest (and until i'm told otherwise that i don't get notified of roleblocks [and if i don't, that's some bullshit right there]) - i popped the acqs as, imo, they'd want to wolfhunt as much as a town would. i don't think a wolf puts in nearly that much effort. |
||||
03-11-2020, 05:56 PM | #1422 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 62
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I don't want to play the "If Dora is town/wolf/acqui I think ____ " game.
History has proven that it's better I save my energy after flip. |
03-11-2020, 05:58 PM | #1423 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 47
Posts: 1
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Quote:
|
|
03-11-2020, 06:01 PM | #1424 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 61
Posts: 2
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Iight, I'm at work and I SHOULD be around for EOD seeing as it's at 01:00
|
03-11-2020, 06:11 PM | #1425 | ||||||||||||
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 62
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
From Flurry:
Quote:
Quote:
I want to say that there is likely to be at least one wolf amongst those trying to normalize the idea of the doc not saving cop and/or wolves targeting cop. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
----------------------------------------------- Gonna try to address everyone all at once regarding my EoD behavior. Quote:
I was paying attention to EoD though, so of course, when I see Del claiming a PR role, I'm not going to do absolutely nothing lmfao. I panicked and threw my vote on the next available wagon to maximize the chance of Del not being lynched. One might argue that had I looked at the current votes at the time, it was already clear that Del wouldn't have been lynched even if I did nothing (I would need to double check this to be sure). However, I was unsure about the exact vote count in the heat of the moment and I didn't want to waste time by checking what it was. One might argue that I should have added a reason to my vote, but I wanted to ensure my vote change went through. I could have made another post afterwards explaining my reason, but I didn't want to accidentally post after the phrase was over. One might argue that there was an "entire" two minutes to do stuff which is plenty of time. I can't remember precisely what happened, but if I see that the time of a post is 11:58pm, that signals to me that it is possible that that post was made 1 minute and 1 second before midnight. Furthermore, there is going to be a slight delay between the time that the post is made and when I see the actual post. Thus, in my mind, it was theoretically possible that I had less than a minute to do something. Not sure I already said this already, but I was essentially reading zucker as null, even at the point where I switched my point to him. My reasoning for voting him in particular is that I was ok with the possibility of an inactive townie being lynched as opposed to trying to get another train going in the last 2 minutes of the game and risk getting the cop lynched. I feel dumb for having to explain myself in the last two paragraphs, but it seemed necessary to explain since it seemed some people just wasn't getting it. Like I mentioned before, I wouldn't be surprised if there are some wolves that joined the zucker train after del claimed. However, I don't think such behavior is wolfy in and of itself, even in the case of not providing an explanation. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a wolf that is not in the zucker-train-post-del-claim that is trying to tarnish the reputation of a townie that just so happens to be in the zucker-train-post-del-claim. ----------------------------------------------------- Quick Reads: Phil: Despite my saltiness towards him saying blocker should claim, town. However, if in the rare event that we somehow find out wolves did the galaxy brain move of not sending a kill last night to sow confusion, I think it might be worth looking at Phil more carefully. Maple: In the case that Dora isn't aqui, I'm thinking that Maple might be. The earlier gimmick was so annoying as to give off the idea to town that it was so annoying that aqui wouldn't want to deal with it. Even if she found the gimmick annoying herself, she probably knew people would complain about it and thus would also have a valid reason to stop doing it. This might just be a tinfoil hat read. Chief: Was reading as wolfy on d0. Still do: other than post 1367, most of his posts seem reactionary and/or don't do much to help solve the game. Punchy: Been reading as town lately. I do like his long posts that seem to show that he is trying to dig deep to get some good reads. I might be misremembering, but I feel like he was the first to start putting together a case against Flurry this phase which I liked since prior to that, I feel like most of town was reading Flurry as solid town or at least town lean. I feel like wolves would try to stick to generic mainstream reads that everyone was already agreeing with. Julian: Anyone that is wolf reading him because he was pushing for a Del lynch at EoD is dumb. However, I didn't like how you were somewhat flip-flopping regarding your read on me. I was honestly surprised that a single post that I made on d0 seemed to satisfy you (if TWG has taught me anything, it's that I'm not good at being convincing). I was thinking you might revisit the idea of my being wolf this phase, especially due to my absence, but you seemed to mostly be quiet on this. I still have a strong wolf-lean of you because of this. Flurry: In my head, I've been flip-flopping in my read of Flurry throughout this phase. I want to look closer at Punchy's posts regarding Flurry and also iso Flurry later to get a better idea. Eugene: Slight town lean. Mathilda: Didn't really care for the lazy attitude on d0. And nothing strikes me as particularly towny from you this phase either. Might put as slight wolf lean for now...might change a tad if I have time to do an iso later. Dora: Either aqui or wolf. The only way this isn't the case is doctor didn't protect cop which I don't think is the case. |
||||||||||||
03-11-2020, 06:13 PM | #1426 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 62
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Unfortunately, I have something I need to do some IRL stuff (that I haven't started) that I need to finish by 11pm server time. I'll be around for the last hour so feel free to ask me any questions and I'll try to respond when I get back.
|
03-11-2020, 06:19 PM | #1427 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 61
Posts: 2
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Molly I think you're mistaken... EOD is Midnight server time, not 11PM
|
03-11-2020, 06:20 PM | #1428 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 47
Posts: 1
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
here, let me translate the bolded part for everyone: (awoooooooooo)
|
03-11-2020, 06:20 PM | #1429 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 47
Posts: 1
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
|
03-11-2020, 06:21 PM | #1430 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 47
Posts: 1
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
seriously though. any time someone basically wants to start an ama, it's usually a wolf wanting to appear active and have thread presence.
problem is, they also get burned 99% of the time in doing so. |
03-11-2020, 06:25 PM | #1431 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 74
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I'm not tunneling it I was defending my right to be suspicious of it when everyone was telling me I shouldn't be.
I'm dealing with birthday stuff rn but I'll be back |
03-11-2020, 06:34 PM | #1432 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 61
Posts: 2
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
|
03-11-2020, 06:35 PM | #1433 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 75
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
my computer is currently shitting itself so I'll be phoneposting tonight what what
|
03-11-2020, 06:38 PM | #1434 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 90
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
|
03-11-2020, 06:38 PM | #1435 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 47
Posts: 1
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
|
03-11-2020, 06:59 PM | #1436 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 62
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
|
03-11-2020, 07:00 PM | #1437 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 62
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
The nothing part only makes sense in the world where I thought blocker was a protective role.
|
03-11-2020, 07:06 PM | #1438 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 74
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Not mine, someone else's. Trying to read in between. I don't really see any other world than going for Dora though. The likelihood of Aqui is high unless the vigi claim is fake, but I'm not thinking fake atm.
Still really bothered by the idea of the wolves stacking the block and kill on Del in the same night, just seems really odd. I guess the reasoning could be they were hoping Doc would go for another target and decided to take the shot but roleblocked as a backup but that seems really stupid to do with how many people are in game and all the other PRs they could have possibly taken out last night knowing the Doctor almost always will protect the cop. There has to be something I'm missing. |
03-11-2020, 07:06 PM | #1439 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 61
Posts: 2
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
|
03-11-2020, 07:08 PM | #1440 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Age: 62
Posts: 0
|
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Molly sure took the long way to just say "I moved to Zucker 'cause best wagon".
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|