Entropy Gain for per-receptor NPS

[RenegadeLucien]

Originally Posted by xXOpkillerXx

How high does your algo rate DP compared to Undici ? Those are really hard files and none have been AAA'd yet Right now, they're only 2 points apart from each other, and I would Not consider the opposite to be an error because it's only a single file (it's better to look at results as a whole first and then understand the difference between particular files, so not having your complete results, I can only assume things).

Way higher. I haven't scaled it to match the 1-120 (or 1-99) FFR scale, but Undici is given a value of 49.5 (for some comparisons, RATO is 46.4, Magical 8bit Tour is 41.2, La Camp is 39.4). DP is given 62.7.

As for you AIM example, it would make no sense to put a long jack and a long jack with 1 jump in it at the same exact difficulty on a real numbers scale. The one with the jump Has to be harder, even if it's by a very small amount.

Yes, the 3 jack with the one 4 jump is harder than a 3 jack. But I question it being harder than a {34} jack. I don't know about you, but I can do faster 3 jacks than I can do {34} jacks.

[xXOpkillerXx]

Originally Posted by RenegadeLucien

Way higher. I haven't scaled it to match the 1-120 (or 1-99) FFR scale, but Undici is given a value of 49.5 (for some comparisons, RATO is 46.4, Magical 8bit Tour is 41.2, La Camp is 39.4). DP is given 62.7.



Yes, the 3 jack with the one 4 jump is harder than a 3 jack. But I question it being harder than a {34} jack. I don't know about you, but I can do faster 3 jacks than I can do {34} jacks.

Ok yes that is an odd result haha.

As for the jacks, the difficulty of perhand would be symmetric on both sides of of the 2:1 ratio, but the nps primitive would naturally make a [34] jumpjack harder than a 3 jack with a single [34] in it.