Gay marriage, Explained by Zo

[hayatewillown]

Stumbled across this: http://patdollard.com/2008/11/zo-tel...-gay-marriage/

If anybody knows about patdollard, then go ahead, explain what it is. I believe it is a viable resource for people that want to learn what a true american is. So please, don't go out and hate on my resource


He explains it pretty well, just want to know what people think of this video, I don't believe in gay marriage, but I do believe that homosexuals are born- well- homosexual.

Lets discuss

[NFD]

I wasn't born gay. I lost my virginity to a girl in the 7th grade. When I got into high school, something inside me just ticked though. I would never get married anyway, but it's still kind of stupid how they're recalling that bill in California. I guess Arnold isn't as awesome as he once was.

[hayatewillown]

Originally Posted by NFD

I wasn't born gay. I lost my virginity to a girl in the 7th grade. When I got into high school, something inside me just ticked though. I would never get married anyway, but it's still kind of stupid how they're recalling that bill in California. I guess Arnold isn't as awesome as he once was.

What I'm worried about is an overthrow of government.
I'm independent, I learn toward conservatism, but I have some liberal views as well. I'm also young, but I want to be politically involved in things, and when it comes to gay marriage, I don't believe in it, because I do believe it is reserved for heterosexuals ^^''

But why would somebody (with somebody else) go out and change something like that?

[devonin]

I believe it is a viable resource for people that want to learn what a true american is. So please, don't go out and hate on my resource

I'm not going to hate on it, I'm just going to point out that it is a worthless resource for Critical Thinking.

He provides no actual evidence to support any claim he makes, makes a number of claims that fly directly in the face of scientific evidence, he strawmans a number of lines of reasoning to try and prove them wrong, and otherwise utterly fails to provide anything that could actually be called an argument.