TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Apollo taking this line wrt Boomer's claim is very weird, and it makes me think they're likely to be together if Boomer is fake somehow
(I don't think Boomer is fake)
Agent S had a good post earlier this phase, but his activity has really dropped off, and that makes me sadComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Well I'm a phone atm so I'm waiting till I get back before I do stuffsComment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
I quoted this post and some other posts regarding vigi, but I started writing this post as of the most recent post in thread, mrmpht.it's more likely that vigi decided not to shoot imo what what
i could see a vigi player be fearful of shooting a town or deciding it's too soon to use their ability, whereas it still makes very little sense to me for the acqui to not take someone over at every possible opportunity
When I was reading through, I was going to say that I mindmelded with the idea that they probably holstered considering the counterwagon fizzled due to Del claiming. Kinda hard to say that my mindmeld truly happened here, but trust me, I felt it before I saw the vigi claim!
And with this one I was gonna say that it's too early to speculate so much.
Still, it's fair to keep this post in here!
Yes, mrmpht.
I agree with this still.
This is a bit too flimsy of a read. Seems like a generalization to justify a scumread on Mathilda. Gross! Reeks of overcooked bok choy, mrmpht.
Yes.
I was with you on the holstering part for vigi as I mentioned earlier. However, looks like that's not worth diving into anymore!
I like this take. Looking cool, Julian.
This post takes too long to get to the point. I'm a bit worried Chrissy is going to spend more time feeding flavour than focusing on the thread.OK I realize where I went wrong with my big post earlier. I read Phil's post as if it should have been "if ur a role and around Del, claim." Insisting it was aimed at the people who voted Del. Instead it might have also been: "if ur a role and around, Del, claim.", only being aimed at Del.
Phil could you clarify what you meant by that if you haven't already? Because I both can't remember if you did and am running out of time to go check; dying computer and school ending and what not, sparkle~
The moral of the story? Commas are important~!
And about my question at the end of "Where's Apollo?", making an addendum. My sense of time is... pretty bad apparently. I thought two days ago (the last time he posted was the 8th, 9:38 PM server time) was a very long time ago game-wise, and that the day started on the NINTH, and not the TENTH. Upon further reading and editing of this post, I realize that EoD isn't 10:00 PM (server time)
Moral of the story #2? Read more carefully AND SLOWLY, Chrissy!
I felt the same way rereading this section. I did highlight a few posts, but it's just stupid. Look how quickly it all cleared up when Boomer claimed. All that wasted time. Could have been preparing dinner for tomorrow, mrmpht.I'm all caught up.
Funny that it took roughly 10 pages or so for people to argue WIFOMnomics of what happened last night, to arrive at the same conclusion that Del needs to post in thread about what they did last night to even start talking about it.
Viewpoint on Julian really hasn't changed. Really like Eugene doing the digging work that they're putting in. Mathilda was doing a lot of work as well but nothing really stood out to me as a lot of the convo was on-topic with 'what happened overnight'.
I quoted this originally to ask why he was on Dora, but this looks pretty good now if people are questioning his claim. This post looks pretty rock-solid for his claim. Obviously it can still be counterclaimed, but it might be a bit hard with this, mrmpht.love how you point out my early game read solely based on a character as a solid read, lol. get real.
people getting on julian for digging hard into del should probably step back and remember how del would want to play as a cop: utr, going with the flow and just trying to fit in without making themselves too obvious.
the problem is with how ffr works, that's also the usual strategy for wolves here so del just flew a little too far under.
i also don't feel that a wolf makes themselves that loud on d0.
for now, julian is fine to me.
del is obviously fine.
punchy i still like from their late-d0.
eugene is real good right about now.
i don't agree. i think del got roleblocked and kill-stacked but got saved, and vigi's target was vested. i do agree on acqui not doing anything though. it's kind of interesting as that leads to 2 scenarios in my mind about that.
1) they felt confident enough in their current slot to stay behind for a day
2) they were just legit afk all night
until del shows up, though, and can confirm whether they got roleblocked, we're still just speculating.
dora
Rolf and Apollo confirmed not reading the OP.
Responding to your big EOD post:
I agree with what you said about Rolf. I would like Rolf to look at some other points than just Julian though. But yes, one cool point is good.
Mathilda does need to do more work. I asked them questions. They should respond to me when they're back, mrmpht!
You mentioned Chief's read, would you say that Cherry is trending up for you? See my first big post of the night for how I saw her read of Zucker. It's pretty close to yours.
I'm not liking Flurry even more now. Why ask for a thunderdome? Why not just read more of Cherry's posts again or ask them questions about specific players? This is such a weird way of going about it.
Not voted for anyone? Come on now! This is stinkier than overcooked bok choy. You're making me as salty as a can of black olives. Apollo, please do some more reads than your barebones list. I know you're phoneposting, so if you can't do a reads list because it's annoying, just have more interactions.
What Phil said, mrmpht.
No, look at what I did.
Want to share a bowl of ramen?
See my point earlier!
Not everyone's been in the thread yet, though! Counterclaims shmounterclaims, mrmpht.
Flurry, you're doing all the wrong things. This looks opportunistic. If we weren't working with the vigi claim and solving Dora today, I would have my vote on you right now!
I agree with the first line, but I think you've got a lot of work cut out for you.
Once again, not everyone has been here, blahblabhalbh.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Punchy's 600 mile long posts are hard to read, but I can see he's putting in work... As much as I hate to do this and I promised myself I wouldn't for this game, the style of which they're doing it reminds me of someone and I'm pretty sure it's one of two people that I can think ofComment
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
nah, I don't really care about that, that's analysis that they did today, not yesterday. I don't really think I would even call that "a read on Zucker"
A read on Chief, however, I can see, and I didn't even realize Chief had done that. I was more talking about when Chief gave his reads list for the first day and it had Zucker as town for not very much reasoning.
THAT part makes me like Cherry a little bit.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Wait a second, where the hell is Chief? I forgot he even existedComment
-
Comment
Comment