how well do you recognize pitches?
Collapse
X
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
THANK YOU for having such a good attitude about it. I know too many people who take their gift for granted. (Sounds like I'm saying that I gave it to them the way I worded it. I probably did, though. o.o)Pure tone: 34
Piano tone: 36
I missed a couple in the first test because I couldn't actually make out the tones properly on my speakers. But yeah, I knew I possessed absolute pitch: frankly I'm not sure I would have taken up music as a major or enjoyed music in general as much if my sense of pitch was poor, so I feel thoroughly blessed to have it.
Basically the same for me. I do have a few classmates with perfect pitch, but I'm not too jealous because I happen to have much better musicality than them.
HIGH-FIVING A MILLION ANGELS!
sigpicComment
-
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
yeah thats what i thought for a bit too. i also only know middle C hehu

Comment
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
I think the concept of absolute pitch is a little silly. I think knowing relative pitch is good enough. Having absolute pitch is like being able to tell what the absolute temperature is as opposed to most people who can only identify things that are "hotter" or "colder."AMA: http://ask.fm/benguino

Originally posted by Spenner(^)> peck peck says the heelsOriginally posted by Xx{Midnight}xXAnd god made ben, and realized he was doomed to miss. And said it was good.Originally posted by Zakvvv666awww :< crushing my dreams; was looking foward to you attempting to shoot yourself point blank and missing
Comment
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
Absolute pitch and relative pitch both have pros and cons.. It's best to have both of them.Comment
-
AMA: http://ask.fm/benguino

Originally posted by Spenner(^)> peck peck says the heelsOriginally posted by Xx{Midnight}xXAnd god made ben, and realized he was doomed to miss. And said it was good.Originally posted by Zakvvv666awww :< crushing my dreams; was looking foward to you attempting to shoot yourself point blank and missing
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
Yeah, this test is extremely contingent on whether you've read music for a long time or not and a 36/36 doesn't mean you have perfect pitch. Eventually, you'd just have a sense for each note and could develop it enough to get 36/36 on this even without having perfect pitch. By way of comparison, a regular person and a person with eidetic memory could take a 100-question test for their history class and score 100/100 each; you would have to introduce factors that isolate the innateness.Comment
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
pretty much this and hi you're aliveYeah, this test is extremely contingent on whether you've read music for a long time or not and a 36/36 doesn't mean you have perfect pitch. Eventually, you'd just have a sense for each note and could develop it enough to get 36/36 on this even without having perfect pitch. By way of comparison, a regular person and a person with eidetic memory could take a 100-question test for their history class and score 100/100 each; you would have to introduce factors that isolate the innateness.Originally posted by t-rogdori finally got a weed hookup again and i texted the dude asking where to meet him tomorrow and the dude just said "out west"
dude
out west?
the fuck kinda location is west?
am i buying weed off a gotdamn pirate
Originally posted by lurkerremind everyone that i am an outed racist neo-nazi who no one in their right mind should ever interact with in any way whatsoever
http://imgur.com/a/Ww9g3Comment
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
This test seems biased because the first note I hear I think of as being Do, which then makes everything relative to the first pitch I heard, and not me trying to think of what the actual pitch is.Comment
-
-
Re: how well do you recognize pitches?
Um, just because a person learned perfect pitch, it doesn't mean it wouldn't be perfect pitch. Nowhere in the definition of it says it has to be innate. Same as with if you've had no musical training, but yet possess a strong innate ability for perfect pitch, and you perceive notes as always being a certain pitch, by definition, if you could not name them according to some well-know nomenclature, you would not have perfect pitch. (Although you could get it relatively easily I'm guessing.) The history comparison seems innaccurate; there's no hidden meaning or deeper understanding to knowing what a note is.Yeah, this test is extremely contingent on whether you've read music for a long time or not and a 36/36 doesn't mean you have perfect pitch. Eventually, you'd just have a sense for each note and could develop it enough to get 36/36 on this even without having perfect pitch. By way of comparison, a regular person and a person with eidetic memory could take a 100-question test for their history class and score 100/100 each; you would have to introduce factors that isolate the innateness.
4.75 pure tone
7.25 piano tone
Piano tones seemed easier overall, no surprise I got a couple better ones for the piano than the pure tones. Makes sense to me too, that it'd be easier, with all the undertones and overtones that any non-pure tone has, because keys (overall key, not individual notes) which are rarely used would be easier to pick out than individual pitches, (which would get used more often than other ones.)
Some tones just seemed jarring, but that's probably, again, me assigning a key to the random notes based on their ordering, and it was obvious when the next note played wouldn't even be a part of that key's scale.Last edited by Cavernio; 03-24-2011, 04:52 PM.Comment





Comment