Re: TWG 199: The Reaper's Game -Final Remix- GAME THREAD
So like, there's this thing called "desire to understand something" which according to me is super broken in TWG meta.
If I understand what you're doing, I can understand your reality a little better.
If I understand why you're doing what you're doing, I can understand the intentions better and stop being wrong every 5 seconds.
If you understand what I'm doing and why I'm doing it, it can help you take better decisions overall as well.
So, it's pretty much win/win to share information that promotes being helpful to others in your own way as long as it's only to help alignment.
I can start simple, take everything at face value and town read everyone that seems to agree with me. It's going to give me a pool of players that may or may not match what others are thinking and then I can like compare with others why they think I'm crazy for having certain reads. It's simple, easy and I already know I'm going to be likely very wrong at first, but I think it will create that path which moves the game forward. I actually believe FFA also tend to play the devil's advocate and do the exact same thing to help later on when town. People usually hate him for it because it breaks popular opinion, but that's a thing that's actually very observable and kinda efficient for getting out of a rabbit hole.
Anyway, probably more efficient to point finger randomly at this stage and pray something sticks eventually.
So like, there's this thing called "desire to understand something" which according to me is super broken in TWG meta.
If I understand what you're doing, I can understand your reality a little better.
If I understand why you're doing what you're doing, I can understand the intentions better and stop being wrong every 5 seconds.
If you understand what I'm doing and why I'm doing it, it can help you take better decisions overall as well.
So, it's pretty much win/win to share information that promotes being helpful to others in your own way as long as it's only to help alignment.
I can start simple, take everything at face value and town read everyone that seems to agree with me. It's going to give me a pool of players that may or may not match what others are thinking and then I can like compare with others why they think I'm crazy for having certain reads. It's simple, easy and I already know I'm going to be likely very wrong at first, but I think it will create that path which moves the game forward. I actually believe FFA also tend to play the devil's advocate and do the exact same thing to help later on when town. People usually hate him for it because it breaks popular opinion, but that's a thing that's actually very observable and kinda efficient for getting out of a rabbit hole.
Anyway, probably more efficient to point finger randomly at this stage and pray something sticks eventually.
Comment