TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

[TWG Tank]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Wait, huh? Not sure what you're saying here.

im responding to your idea about wolves choosing to block boomer bc they thought there was odds he hits a wolf
i can try to rewrite the whole paragraph but if you can be more specific about what you dont get it's less work tbh

[TWG Cherry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

its not a bad thought that wolves could opt to not block if they thought it better
boomer didnt say they were doing consensus in advance tho, and even v flips give us more info sooner, including that the wolves are playin risky
the conclusion is prob still right anyway. i dont feel like the consensus is totally wrong bc i feel good about some t reads

Wait, huh? Not sure what you're saying here.

"it's a good thought that wolves could choose not to rb boomer if they thought he was likely to shoot a town"

"boomer did not say he was going to follow the consensus before night started and even vigi shot flips give us info, including that the wolves are playing risky if they don't block him"

"the consensus is likely accurate because i feel good about some of my town reads"

man maybe i should just quit my job and become a full time interpreter for some of these players what what

[TWG Boomer]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

I assume that's how it works. I haven't used that myself before.

except it's not. they're borrowing the hosts method of vote counts. Probably quoting a prior count of isabelle's and then editting it as such. the automatic one looks much different.

[TWG Tank]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

"it's a good thought that wolves could choose not to rb boomer if they thought he was likely to shoot a town"

"boomer did not say he was going to follow the consensus before night started and even vigi shot flips give us info, including that the wolves are playing risky if they don't block him"

"the consensus is likely accurate because i feel good about some of my town reads"

man maybe i should just quit my job and become a full time interpreter for some of these players what what

villager not vigi but other than that ye

no i dont have a full reads list and its prob not happenin tonite tbh

[TWG Phil]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Chrissy put the game at L-1 by voting Dora, but Del unvoted right before it.

I think it's unlikely that she knew exactly where things stood; not sure if wolves are going to be more likely or not

I was in a game recently where town insta'd super early, it was more than just lost time, but lost additional chances to kill wolves that day phase

Wolves (I was one) were hyper aware of the votecount and piled on towards the end (but didnt cast the final vote)

I think, ultimately, this just feels very different than that, it really doesnt feel like anyone knew what the vc was

[TWG Boomer]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

the program also doesn't keep track of who voted for who; that's a manial thing that some hosts like to do.

[TWG Boomer]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

er who voted for who throughout the phase.

[TWG Phil]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Feels unlikely that we'd catch a wolf over that
I think shes wolfy for doing almost no solving

[TWG Cherry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

villager not vigi but other than that ye

no i dont have a full reads list and its prob not happenin tonite tbh

damn, i was so close to nailing that what what

[TWG Boomer]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

At same time, would a wolf really hammer like that ? meh

less time to talk, and plausible deniability about what the votes were at? they were piling on pretty quick.
hell, if del didn't unvote, i'm pretty sure that WAS insta.

[TWG Julian]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

yeah, i just don't see chrissy faking it, flurry

[TWG Agent S]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Votecount?

[TWG Punchy]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

Chief
I guess I should say I'm not surprised I didn't find much here.

Get your own food then.

Much like the flavour response of Chief/Zucker, we have this one here between Chief/Molly. It's not much, it's early game, and I'm not gonna read into it.

01) Agent S NULL
02) Apollo TOWN
03) Boomer TOWN
04) Cherry NULL
05) Chief TOWN
06) Del NULL
07) Dora W LEAN
08) Dotty NULL
09) Fauna NULL
10) Flurry TOWN
11) Julian W LEAN
12) Maple NULL
13) Mathilda NULL
14) Melba NULL
15) Molly NULL
16) Phil TOWN
17) Punchy TOWN
18) Rolf NULL
19) Tank TOWN
20) Zucker NULL

Here's really the only reads he's given on EVERY player, mrmpht. Dotty and Molly are null. I can't say this is not what I was expecting. Most of Chief's posts have been responses to Phil, Flurry, Julian, and sometimes me.

Not twisting words is important as well, have you been seeing any of that?

This is a question for Chrissy now that they're in the game. It's a softball "have you seen this in the game?" question about seeing word twisting. It's an easy "expand on this" to interact with a potential partner without providing any reads on them.

Felt bad to delete it.
Mostly a genuine question.

Once again, it's continuing the same softball question. It's nice that they extended it, but it's a pretty soft prod. If Chief was going for partner interaction points, this would be about it in the scope of Chief/Molly/Chrissy.

---

Inconclusive. Chief has simply not provided nearly enough reads on the other people in this circle. If we vote Chief out and they flip, Flurry might be one to look into based on amounts of interactions fmpov. I'm only saying Flurry here because I have a negative read on them, mrmpht.

[TWG Flurry]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

yeah, i just don't see chrissy faking it, flurry

Well, that's probably for the best. I'd feel bad to be at the right place for a reason like that.

[TWG Phil]

Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]

yeah, i just don't see chrissy faking it, flurry

Finally, something we can agree on!