That wasn't a read, I never said it was. I was adding to the debate of them being aqui IF they were the aqui. But good try there buddy.
Ah, but you were answering in Julian's stead. Reading again, it does kinda imply that you might be saying that Mathilda didn't acquire because of their particular schedule.
I will concede that this wasn't a direct read, though. My mistake. Maybe I should check my list of ingredients again, mrmpht.
You're free to speculate, of course. I'm counting on you to watch me for acquisitioner then!
What do you think of my read on Cherry or Flurry? I'm thankful Phil responded to me on Cherry, but I want to see what you think. Basically, I'm just looking for a bit of affirmation.
Lots of people are hung up on the possible slip that Flurry made, but I think there's plenty of other activity in this slot that is suspect, mrmpht. You can just Ctrl+F "Flurry" when looking through my posts to get through them more easily.
I'll absolutely be keeping an eye out to see if your posting style changes, yes.
Cherry is a bit of a null, they've not done much really that I like. But not enough for me to just outright say "yeah you gotta go".
Flurry's little comment hasn't gone unnoticed by me, and I want it addressed near EOD today once we get our PR debacle sorted out.
The only one who can solve that, unfortunately is Molly.
honestly, people can get over not liking me asking the blocker to out
its the most logical explanation for what happened, and while it looks like things are going to work out today anyways, what I did was good and I know it
I'll absolutely be keeping an eye out to see if your posting style changes, yes.
Cherry is a bit of a null, they've not done much really that I like. But not enough for me to just outright say "yeah you gotta go".
Flurry's little comment hasn't gone unnoticed by me, and I want it addressed near EOD today once we get our PR debacle sorted out.
The only one who can solve that, unfortunately is Molly.
What about the Flurry/Cherry thunderdome proposal? What about Flurry pointing out the "interesting votes" without diving too much into them? I pointed out that a couple of the people in her "interesting votes" list weren't even here at EOD. Both of my posts have points about Flurry, mrmpht.
What about the Flurry/Cherry thunderdome proposal? What about Flurry pointing out the "interesting votes" without diving too much into them? I pointed out that a couple of the people in her "interesting votes" list weren't even here at EOD. Both of my posts have points about Flurry, mrmpht.
Dumb as shit. It shouldn't happen. It's like Flurry is being lazy and chucking rocks for a reaction from Cherry, who hasn't done much but try to figure out what happened this phase
Can you point out the people in her vote list for me Punch?
Dumb as shit. It shouldn't happen. It's like Flurry is being lazy and chucking rocks for a reaction from Cherry, who hasn't done much but try to figure out what happened this phase
Can you point out the people in her vote list for me Punch?
Sure, here you go!
Originally posted by TWG Punchy
Originally posted by TWG Flurry
If I am the Nerfed Doctor, then I did nothing.
If I am the Vigi, I shot Punchy because I think there's 1 W in Julian/Punchy.
If I am the Blocker, I blocked Del for obvious reasons.
If I am the PI, I targeted Apollo because he was odd early game.
Melba, Dotty, Apollo and Zucker didn't vote last phase.
So, the only surprising one is Apollo.
Interesting votes:
Chief -> Dora
Punchy -> Chief
Maple -> Apollo
Cherry -> Flurry
Fauna -> Dotty
Pretty sure many other people have commented on the top part, but I want to talk about the bottom part regarding votes. You call them interesting, but a number of these people weren't really into EOD very late. Maple wasn't really around, Cherry wasn't really around, and Fauna wasn't really around either. Why are these interesting? This sounds like you're trying to give the impression you're reading into the votes without actually thinking about the perspective behind them. I don't like this, mrmpht.
Comment