TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
you gotta love crossposts sometimesComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
alright, that's it, i'm never wolfreading anyone ever againComment
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
Here's a compromise. I'll make slightly shorter posts but still in the same way.
It also has equal probability of either of the blockers targeting the acquisitioner, but the wolf blocker was probably on Del.
See later for this probability thing wrt Phil
Yes, I like this idea. Not sure how many other people jumped onto this.kinda something that I think would be worthwhile for a lot of people to do:
If I am a Village Power Role, then last night, my role action was
If I am the Nerfed Doctor, then I saved Del
If I am the Vigi, I shot Mathilda, and she's alive for some reason
If I am the Blocker, I blocked Chief
If I am the PI, I targeted Molly randomly
If I'm doctor: Del
If I'm vigi: Mathilda
If I'm blocker: Apollo
If I'm PI: Dora
This here? This is dumb though. Not vibing this, mrmpht. There's no way to confirm anything that happened in the night, with the exception of Del. I don't think anyone has counterclaimed him at all, so this is the only real account of the night we can trust. The town blocker could have blocked the wolf, the vigi, or the acquisitioner, or they could have whiffed and any combination of inactions could have complicated this. Yes, we're ahead and have one wolf, but this is just wildly irresponsible and pretty shady, Phil.eh, honestly, the fact that there wasn't a nightkill last night at all is very important
I'd assume wolves didn't want to target del, since the nerfed doctor would probably always save del, so maybe the town blocker actually did something for once?
vigilante definitely should've shot though (I'm assuming del was at least roleblocked by the wolves here)
considering asking the roleblocker to out their target
Pretty sure many other people have commented on the top part, but I want to talk about the bottom part regarding votes. You call them interesting, but a number of these people weren't really into EOD very late. Maple wasn't really around, Cherry wasn't really around, and Fauna wasn't really around either. Why are these interesting? This sounds like you're trying to give the impression you're reading into the votes without actually thinking about the perspective behind them. I don't like this, mrmpht.If I am the Nerfed Doctor, then I did nothing.
If I am the Vigi, I shot Punchy because I think there's 1 W in Julian/Punchy.
If I am the Blocker, I blocked Del for obvious reasons.
If I am the PI, I targeted Apollo because he was odd early game.
Melba, Dotty, Apollo and Zucker didn't vote last phase.
So, the only surprising one is Apollo.
Interesting votes:
Chief -> Dora
Punchy -> Chief
Maple -> Apollo
Cherry -> Flurry
Fauna -> Dotty
I'm with Agent S here, it's a fool's errand to make specific assumptions about one phase when we haven't even heard from everyone.
At least he's really engaging tons of posts. Not saying you're ignoring his other posts, but it seems like you saw the one targeting you and wanted to plug some other posts so it didn't look as defensive.Eugene, I just wanted to say; you stop at the weirdest posts.
The Julian post is hardly alignment indicative.
The 5 post minimum thing is not something we can do anything about.
I also don't understand why you would think that it's important for me to find who people are over alignment either.
Look at the timing of the vote, mrmpht. It was within the last 90 seconds of EOD, and there was no way I was legitimately going to swing. Truth be told, I wasn't really reading into Zucker that much aside from the fact they weren't here. I didn't like Mathilda out of the inactive bunch over Zucker and the other ones as they were a bit more involved.
And while we're on the topic of Chief, I thought about Chief over the night. I thought I had a read on the player they were, and I thought they were acting wolfy. The player I had in mind usually cracks and crashes out of the thread upon extended provocation, but I reread their posts and progression again and I just didn't see it. I'm cooling off of Chief for now, mrmpht.
Can you clarify again why you like Apollo? Was it you who said that they didn't look too crazy since they read EOD incorrectly?
I'm with you on Mathilda at this point.So I’ve been out all day and I’m gonna ISO all these people when I get home but I just wanted to put some thoughts out there to hopefully start some discussion
As mentioned before, punchy and chief look a little too comfortable interacting with zucker.
Matthilda doesn’t seem to be very interested in helping us solve this game at all
Phil is eh for the fake roleclaim suggestions, I feel like that’s something a wolf would find a lot more valuable than a town would
I really didn’t like julians EoD, he seemed to swing all over the place, not even believing his own comments
Phil's claim suggestion was good, but I think his insistence on the roleblocker is pretty suspect.
I don't agree with you that Julian didn't believe his own comments. His comments on me/del being partners felt like it came from a very consistent mindset throughout EOD. I'm not seeing this, Fauna.
And Zucker? Those were extremely early game interactions. How are you putting so much stake into those?
You do that here too, mrmpht. Putting lots of stake into early game interactions.boomer is currently topping my list of suspects.
He is not getting involved in discussions, the only person in the entire game he challenged was Chief and last but not least he has made one semblance of a read in the game, as a strong town lean, and guess who it was?
Zucker.
i honestly don't think acqui made a move last night, the odds that the PI hit them are way too low what what
which brings us to either they're inactive af (i.e. one of the replacements) or are trying to lay low for a while
i still don't see much of a reason for them to lay low, a 3rd party is going to want to cull the playerbase as much as possible to try to winI was going to call out Cherry for posting too much about what happened in the night (like the first post here), but I started seeing more posts like the second and I liked it. It feels like Cherry is digging into the right angle for making sense of Zucker. Instead of talking about it blindly like Flurry, or looking at early game interactions like Fauna did, Cherry opted to look into Chief in more detail. Cherry is trending up, what what. Wait a second, that's your line, mrmpht.
See what I said above in my response to Faunaif you guys think me pushing my case on del is sus then i beg you to go back, read exactly what i wrote about him, then look at his posts in that context and tell me i'm wrong for thinking the way that i did. trying to peg me as a wolf because i ended up being wrong is so lame
Did you use the word "hopping" here on purpose? Ha ha! Either way, no, the pressure was the fact that you dipped out of EOD. I don't think anybody was really too concerned about you not being here as soon as phase started.
I felt similar with Del. Some of the posts they were making were rather awkward, like that "opening their gab" post. I didn't like that. I also mentioned that first "I'm here but not really" post as the start of my suspicion. Being wrong sucks.yeah, i was convinced i caught a wolf. it was really obvious wolfplay from my perspective. their posts stunk so bad it was like one small step below a genuine slip. why wouldn't i push that, draw attention to it and get other people to weigh in? i thought we had a better shot with del than picking an inactive at random
What do you think of my angle on Flurry, mrmpht?Comment
-
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
That one took longer than I wanted, mrmpht. Let's kick up the pace!!Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
look, i get it. i played poorly. i haven't played a power role in literally years. i'm sorry.
but i'd like to at least have some sort of contribution.Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
i was townreading dora before, and boomer being a wolf was a pretty popular opinion, so i'm leaning more towards boomer being blocked?Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
nonononono
dora was a fine shot
probably is all just unlucky if you're real
sounds like dora is the bulletproof or the acq, so your shot was almost definitely fineComment
-
Re: TWG 193: Animal Crossing [Game Thread]
like, i did not get told i was roleblocked by our dear isaboo. so unless this game got really fucky, my shot went through.Comment
opcorn:
Comment